On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 04.10.2014 12:51, Joel Rees a écrit:
2014/10/04 17:30 "Curt" :
>
> On 2014-10-03, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org [2] wrote:
> >
> >
> > I like this one, because it makes me smile. I like pieces of
softwares
> > with "play on words
Le 04.10.2014 12:51, Joel Rees a écrit :
2014/10/04 17:30 "Curt" :
>
> On 2014-10-03, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org [2] wrote:
> >
> >
> > I like this one, because it makes me smile. I like pieces of
softwares
> > with "play on words" (this translation sounds strange... is it
the
> > co
2014/10/04 17:30 "Curt" :
>
> On 2014-10-03, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org <
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I like this one, because it makes me smile. I like pieces of softwares
> > with "play on words" (this translation sounds strange... is it the
> > correct one?)
>
> It's the
On 2014-10-03, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
>
>
> I like this one, because it makes me smile. I like pieces of softwares
> with "play on words" (this translation sounds strange... is it the
> correct one?)
It's the correct one (jeu de mots).
> Oh, and apart from that, for people (if t
Le 02.10.2014 14:11, Marty a écrit :
d-mobilize (inspiring)
[...]
Let me know which name you prefer. We have until the Jessie freeze to
decide. Welcome to your compatible, interoperable systemd future.
I like this one, because it makes me smile. I like pieces of softwares
with "play on words
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:11:56AM -0400, Marty wrote:
> d-nukem (bold)
Could be confused with Duke Nukem! A better name would be
system-downgrade
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressin
On 09/28/2014 08:20 PM, Marty wrote:
On 09/28/2014 09:25 AM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
As a disclaimer, the easy path to
continued across board interoperability may have been successfully
addressed in a Debian-User email that is simply waiting its turn to be
read..
I'm saving it for my next m
On 09/28/2014 09:25 AM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
How'd you ever find that in among every single other thing else that's
out there to study regarding anything Debian...?
Lucky google search I guess.
S Genuine question, not trying to make any point in case it
comes across that way. I tr
On 9/27/14, Marty wrote:
> The Debian Policy Manual currently supports alternate init systems, and
> mentions upstart as an example. sysvinit scripts will continue to be
> required per policy. I got the opposite impression from the TC debate,
> where part of the justification (IIRC) for systemd wa
The Debian Policy Manual currently supports alternate init systems, and
mentions upstart as an example. sysvinit scripts will continue to be
required per policy. I got the opposite impression from the TC debate,
where part of the justification (IIRC) for systemd was avoiding sysvinit
maintenanc
10 matches
Mail list logo
