David Teague wrote:
> Several have written as WCurry has that
>
> > Infomagic should put Debian back on their CDs, but its useless to put
> > so little care into the quality of the product. I guess they figured
> > Debian users aren't real customers. I *used* to be. Not anymore.
> > Hope someone
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 10:31:35 -0400, David Teague wrote:
> Isn't InfoMagic the outfit who has historically delivered broken or out of
> date Debian stuff on their CDs?
Yes.
> Didn't they put the broken "1.0" on their CD without bothering to check
> the appropriateness with the organization?
T
Several have written as WCurry has that
> Infomagic should put Debian back on their CDs, but its useless to put
> so little care into the quality of the product. I guess they figured
> Debian users aren't real customers. I *used* to be. Not anymore.
> Hope someone from Infomagic reads this thre
As mentioned below, Infomagic put 1.3.1 on the CDs because they couldn't
wait for 2.0. It was really a hassle because they still sent out the
first set (at least) with packaging stating that 2.0 was in the collection.
I took it to my folks' house to load on their new computer 2 weeks after buying
4 matches
Mail list logo
