s. keeling([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Incoming from Wayne Topa:
> > Karsten M. Self([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > >
> > > http://linuxmafia.com/~karsten/Downloads/SpamTools.tar.gz
> >
> > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
> >
> > Do
Incoming from Wayne Topa:
> Karsten M. Self([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> >
> > http://linuxmafia.com/~karsten/Downloads/SpamTools.tar.gz
>
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
>
> Do you have another URL Karsten?
At one time, http://linuxmafia.com/~karst
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 06:41:22AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Personally, my own recommendation would be that you don't.
Sound advice, considering how lazy I am.
> - Finding out what DNSBLs are accurate (SpamCop, SpamHaus), a few
> others.
I'm not sure what you mean by "accurate" in
Karsten M. Self([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> on Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 06:04:57PM -0500, Carl Fink ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:00PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > I tend to prefer real email management over fake email address hacks.
> > > Keep
on Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 06:04:57PM -0500, Carl Fink ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:00PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > I tend to prefer real email management over fake email address hacks.
> > Keeps everything simpler, makes the spam easier to report, etc.
>
> Who ar
Joao Clemente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> William Ballard wrote:
> > Including "nospam" in your email name helps a lot.
>
> And how do you subscribe to the list with "nospam" in the e-mail
> address?!? You'll never receive an e-mail to that address!
You could make a username with "nospam" in i
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 14:37, Mark Janssen wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Marsh wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:09:26 +, Chris Lale
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > According to Google, rehash is a Linux/Unix command; but I cannot find
> > > it on my system. Perhaps it
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Marsh wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:09:26 +, Chris Lale
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > According to Google, rehash is a Linux/Unix command; but I cannot find
> > it on my system. Perhaps it has been deprecated?
>
> It's a csh-ism. If you're using
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:09:26 +, Chris Lale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Google, rehash is a Linux/Unix command; but I cannot find
> it on my system. Perhaps it has been deprecated?
It's a csh-ism. If you're using a sh-derivative (eg, bash), you
shouldn't need to do anything. My
On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 21:32, s. keeling wrote:
> > for f in cur/*; do
> > perl adcomplain.pl < $f
> ..
> > done
>
> You can fix that with chmod:
>
> chmod 744 adcomplain.pl
Already done. No, the reason I need to specify perl is that the first
line of adcomplain.pl is a shell hash-
Incoming from Chris Lale:
> On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 17:21, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
>
> Thanks! Works with slight modification:
>
> for f in cur/*; do
> perl adcomplain.pl < $f
..
> done
You can fix that with chmod:
chmod 744 adcomplain.pl
and move adcomplain.pl to one of
On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 17:21, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Chris Lale:
> > On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 23:04, Carl Fink wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:00PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > > I tend to prefer real email management over fake email address hacks.
> > > > Keeps everyth
Incoming from Chris Lale:
> On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 23:04, Carl Fink wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:00PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > I tend to prefer real email management over fake email address hacks.
> > > Keeps everything simpler, makes the spam easier to report, etc.
> >
> >
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 23:04, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:00PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > I tend to prefer real email management over fake email address hacks.
> > Keeps everything simpler, makes the spam easier to report, etc.
>
> Who are you reporting spam to, anyway?
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 03:44:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Who are you reporting spam to, anyway? I'd like to contribute but I'm
> > woefully out-of-touch.
>
> Well, the hosting networks, of course. Though spamcop.net automates
> the process great
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:00PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> I tend to prefer real email management over fake email address hacks.
>> Keeps everything simpler, makes the spam easier to report, etc.
>
> Who
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:00PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I tend to prefer real email management over fake email address hacks.
> Keeps everything simpler, makes the spam easier to report, etc.
Who are you reporting spam to, anyway? I'd like to contribute but I'm
woefully out-of-touch.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
| William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|
|>>Including "nospam" in your email name helps a lot.
|
|
| http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful/
While I agree that address munging is Not A Good Thing, I find the
attempt t
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:29PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Including "nospam" in your email name helps a lot.
>
> http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful/
Sure, but I don't think this is a munge - I understood his post to
mean that "[E
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 16:03, Clive Menzies wrote:
> Below are a range of packages that deal with
> spam:
> gotmail - Utility to download email from a Hotmail or MSN account
Also, in testing and unstable:
hotway - acts like a pop3 server, but actually goes to hotmail.com
to retrieve requested m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Including "nospam" in your email name helps a lot.
http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBlmthUzgNqloQMwcRAlBYAJ97dZK0SZGzM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:48:16 -0500, John Hannibal Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am I safe from getting spam on this list? Will my e-mail address
>> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) be sold or distributed?
>
> All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"John Hannibal Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I safe from getting spam on this list?
Nope, this is an open list, spammers often post to the list. Whether
or not SPI has any luck collecting advertising fees from the spammers
is another quest
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 06:14:45PM +, Joao Clemente wrote:
> William Ballard wrote:
> >Including "nospam" in your email name helps a lot.
>
> And how do you subscribe to the list with "nospam" in the e-mail
> address?!? You'll never receive an e-mail to that address!
It works just fine. I m
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:03:01 +
Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The good news is that there are many ways of dealing with spam using
> Debian, even so far as blocking it at smtp time and so most of it
> never reaches your machine. Below are a range of packages that deal
> with spam
William Ballard wrote:
Including "nospam" in your email name helps a lot.
And how do you subscribe to the list with "nospam" in the e-mail
address?!? You'll never receive an e-mail to that address!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Including "nospam" in your email name helps a lot.
how come ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:02:11AM -0500, Michael Marsh wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:48:16 -0500, John Hannibal Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am I safe from getting spam on this list? Will my e-mail address
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) be sold or distributed?
>
> All mail to this list is ar
Incoming from John Hannibal Smith:
>
> Am I safe from getting spam on this list?
Nope. The list does stop a lot of spam, but some does still come
through.
> Will my e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) be sold or distributed?
Probably, and now that you've posted it, it's available to anyone wh
On (12/11/04 10:48), John Hannibal Smith wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Am I safe from getting spam on this list? Will my e-mail address
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) be sold or distributed?
>
> Just curious! Thanks!
No it won't be sold or distributed but spammers harvest mailing list
archives and news group
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:48:16 -0500, John Hannibal Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I safe from getting spam on this list? Will my e-mail address
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) be sold or distributed?
All mail to this list is archived on the web, so your email address
*will* be harvested by spammers.
Hi everyone,
Am I safe from getting spam on this list? Will my e-mail address
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) be sold or distributed?
Just curious! Thanks!
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
32 matches
Mail list logo