To make a too long thread even longer:
On Aug 19, Dave Cinege wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruce Perens wrote:
> >
> >> So I am running Debian version 1.3 - and yet the CD says Debian 1.3.1 .
> >
> >Oops. My fault. The reason for two numbers is mostly marketing. I know
> >that marketing
The way I see it is this. On ftp.debian.org there is a directory called
"bo-updates" in there are all of the updates, with the changes info, that
have happened since the last major release. Ok, so here is my point, since
any changes that are done are announced via the "debian-changes" list why
do w
--
> From: Dave Cinege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Debian Version Numbers - My rant on this
> Date: Tuesday, August 19, 1997 8:20 PM
>
> On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruc
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997 17:47:12 -0600 (MDT), Anthony Fok wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Dave Cinege wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruce Perens wrote:
>> >
>> >> So I am running Debian version 1.3 - and yet the CD says Debian 1.3.1 .
>> >
>> >Oops. My fault. The reason for two numbers is mos
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Dave Cinege wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruce Perens wrote:
> >
> >> So I am running Debian version 1.3 - and yet the CD says Debian 1.3.1 .
> >
> >Oops. My fault. The reason for two numbers is mostly marketing. I know
> >that marketing is anathema to most of us, bu
On Tue, 19 Aug 97 12:35 PDT, Bruce Perens wrote:
>
>> So I am running Debian version 1.3 - and yet the CD says Debian 1.3.1 .
>
>Oops. My fault. The reason for two numbers is mostly marketing. I know
>that marketing is anathema to most of us, but someone's gotta do it and
>I'm afraid the task fell
6 matches
Mail list logo
