On 03/08/12 04:00 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:17:08PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
It's not Christian's fault that there are incompatibilities. There
are things in the programs he packages that require libraries to be
compiled differently from the ones in the Debian reposito
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:17:08PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> It's not Christian's fault that there are incompatibilities. There
> are things in the programs he packages that require libraries to be
> compiled differently from the ones in the Debian repositories. He's
> aware of the conflicts but is
[2012-08-01 21:18:03 +0200] wrote:
My 2 cents on this is, that once packages is installed from
Debian Multimedia it's very hard to go back to stable. But if
one keeps using
Debian Multimedia there are rarely any problems.
Now I got curious because that sound so general. What makes it
very
t; Titanus Eramius [2012-08-01 21:18:03 +0200] wrote:
> >>>>> My 2 cents on this is, that once packages is installed from
> >>>>> Debian Multimedia it's very hard to go back to stable. But if
> >>>>> one keeps using
> >>>>> D
Am Mittwoch, 1. August 2012 schrieb Teemu Likonen:
> Gary Dale [2012-08-01 13:55:09 -0400] wrote:
> > Agreed. I would also advise people to stay away from
> > debian-multimedia. It's packages are incompatible with standard
> > Debian packages in many cases. [...] de
Hi,
Dňa Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:52:52 -0500 Yaro Kasear napísal:
> I haven't been using Debian as long as many on this list. Are failures
> with Debian-Multimedia that overtly common or are they rather
> circumstantial?
I am using Debian testing at my home computer for some ye
, that once packages is installed from Debian
Multimedia it's very hard to go back to stable. But if one keeps
using
Debian Multimedia there are rarely any problems.
Now I got curious because that sound so general. What makes it very
hard? In my experience installing and removing package
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:20:59 +0300
> Teemu Likonen wrote:
>
>> Gary Dale [2012-08-01 13:55:09 -0400] wrote:
>>
>> > Agreed. I would also advise people to stay away from
>> > debian-multimedia. It&#x
Yaro Kasear wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >Teemu Likonen wrote:
> > >Titanus Eramius wrote:
> > > > My 2 cents on this is, that once packages is installed from Debian
> > > > Multimedia it's very hard to go back to stable. But if one keeps using
Debian
Multimedia it's very hard to go back to stable. But if one keeps
using
Debian Multimedia there are rarely any problems.
Now I got curious because that sound so general. What makes it very
hard? In my experience installing and removing packages has always
been
easy in Debian.
The versi
On 01/08/12 11:52 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
On 08/01/2012 02:55 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 01 aug 12, 22:30:52, Teemu Likonen wrote:
Titanus Eramius [2012-08-01 21:18:03 +0200] wrote:
My 2 cents on this is, that once packages is installed from Debian
Multimedia it's very hard to go
On 01/08/12 03:55 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 01 aug 12, 22:30:52, Teemu Likonen wrote:
Titanus Eramius [2012-08-01 21:18:03 +0200] wrote:
My 2 cents on this is, that once packages is installed from Debian
Multimedia it's very hard to go back to stable. But if one keeps using
D
On 08/01/2012 02:55 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 01 aug 12, 22:30:52, Teemu Likonen wrote:
Titanus Eramius [2012-08-01 21:18:03 +0200] wrote:
My 2 cents on this is, that once packages is installed from Debian
Multimedia it's very hard to go back to stable. But if one keeps using
D
On 08/01/2012 02:18 PM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:20:59 +0300
Teemu Likonen wrote:
Gary Dale [2012-08-01 13:55:09 -0400] wrote:
Agreed. I would also advise people to stay away from
debian-multimedia. It's packages are incompatible with standard
Debian packages in
On Mi, 01 aug 12, 22:30:52, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Titanus Eramius [2012-08-01 21:18:03 +0200] wrote:
>
> > My 2 cents on this is, that once packages is installed from Debian
> > Multimedia it's very hard to go back to stable. But if one keeps using
> > Debian Mu
Titanus Eramius [2012-08-01 21:18:03 +0200] wrote:
> My 2 cents on this is, that once packages is installed from Debian
> Multimedia it's very hard to go back to stable. But if one keeps using
> Debian Multimedia there are rarely any problems.
Now I got curious because that so
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:20:59 +0300
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Gary Dale [2012-08-01 13:55:09 -0400] wrote:
>
> > Agreed. I would also advise people to stay away from
> > debian-multimedia. It's packages are incompatible with standard
> > Debian packages in many cases. [
Gary Dale [2012-08-01 13:55:09 -0400] wrote:
> Agreed. I would also advise people to stay away from
> debian-multimedia. It's packages are incompatible with standard Debian
> packages in many cases. [...] debian-multimedia can be too much of a
> headache.
It has worked fine t
Stu, I forwarded it to the debian-multimedia list this morning. I'll
keep you posted.
-Rob
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 03:04:37PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good time of the day, Rob.
>
>
> You worte:
>
> >I've emailed bugs to the debian-multimedia email list,
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:30:47 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> What's the practice of sending bug reports against packages from
> debian-multimedia?
***
http://debian-multimedia.org/faq.php#q6
Q.How to report a bug ?
A. If the bug is related to packaging you can send me a bug report,
ot
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good time of the day.
>
>
> What's the practice of sending bug reports against packages from
> debian-multimedia? - From its web page I get it as to:
>
> . developers list
>
> . developers of the software.
>
&
Good time of the day, Rob.
You worte:
>I've emailed bugs to the debian-multimedia email list, but they were
>for stuff that didn't affect upstream.
>
>If you want to send me the bug report, I'll send it to the d-m email
>list.
Thank You very much for Your help!
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:30:47PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good time of the day.
>
>
> What's the practice of sending bug reports against packages from
> debian-multimedia? - From its web page I get it as to:
>
> . developers list
>
> . developers of the softw
Good time of the day.
What's the practice of sending bug reports against packages from
debian-multimedia? - From its web page I get it as to:
. developers list
. developers of the software.
It is the first time I try to help w/ the repo/software, and I did
direct it to
mplayer2-d
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 15:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> At 14:43 reloading data for the repositories was ok. I didn't changed
> anything, but at 14:51 I got an error, I reloaded the keyring, anyway,
> at 15:06 I still got this:
>
> W: A error occurred during the signature verifica
At 14:43 reloading data for the repositories was ok. I didn't changed
anything, but at 14:51 I got an error, I reloaded the keyring, anyway,
at 15:06 I still got this:
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The
repository is not updated and the previous inde
It appears to have resolved itself in the last day or two.
--b
On 4/3/11, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:53:15 -0400, Brad Alexander wrote:
>
>> On 4/1/11, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> Check if you have the latest key for the repo:
>>>
>>&g
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:53:15 -0400, Brad Alexander wrote:
> On 4/1/11, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Check if you have the latest key for the repo:
>>
>> apt-cache policy debian-multimedia-keyring
>
> [storm@defiant ~]$ apt-cache policy debian-multimedia-keyri
On 4/1/11, Camaleón wrote:
> Check if you have the latest key for the repo:
>
> apt-cache policy debian-multimedia-keyring
[storm@defiant ~]$ apt-cache policy debian-multimedia-keyring
debian-multimedia-keyring:
Installed: 2010.12.26
Candidate: 2010.12.26
Version table:
*** 201
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:25:30 -0400
Brad Alexander wrote:
Hello Brad,
> Went to the website and got a blank page. Anyone else seeing this?
Site loaded okay at 7.37pm.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Watching the
key for the repo:
apt-cache policy debian-multimedia-keyring
> Went to the website and got a blank page. Anyone else seeing this?
It works fine here (both, the mirror at "dal.ca" and d-m site) :-?
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
For the past two days, I have gotten this on updates:
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not
updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error:
http://mirror.its.dal.ca unstable Release: The following signatures were
invalid: BADSIG 07DC563D1F41B907
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, the problem that probably triggered this recommendation is long
gone, at the time there was an incompatibility between d-m libav* and
Debian vlc if I recall correctly.
they should say, in the videolan forum, that this recommandation is
n forum, and found there an instruction to
> remove the debian-multimedia from the sources.list. Here is an extract
> of the thread:
>
>=
>A significant number of VLC users on Debian and Ubuntu appear to be
>
Hi everybody,
I had a problem reading 1 iso file with vlc(it works with all others)
libdvdnav: DVD disk reports itself with Region mask 0x00f5. Regions: 2 4
libdvdnav: ifoOpenVTSI failed
I then went to the videolan forum, and found there an instruction to
remove the debian-multimedia
I had the same problem until I installed some of the optional acroread
packages (acroread-plugins and mozilla-acroread). That fixed the issue and
now I can fill in and save pdf forms
--Tavi
On 2011-03-09, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
>
I filled them out with evince (buggy on one field of the 1040 form when
saving; you can save the filled-in file and the form still remains
fillable afterwards, which I wasn't able to do with Adobe when
On 03/10/2011 12:01 AM, S D wrote:
--- On Wed, 3/9/11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
PGP/GPG and TLS are *significantly* more secure than
mailing your papers.
You seem to forget that in the process you entrust your data to a *for-profit*
corporation that will store and use it in the way tha
--- On Wed, 3/9/11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> PGP/GPG and TLS are *significantly* more secure than
> mailing your papers.
You seem to forget that in the process you entrust your data to a *for-profit*
corporation that will store and use it in the way that profits them, though you
may fin
In <87aah3hpf0@thumper.dhh.gt.org>, John Hasler wrote:
>I wrote:
>> No electronic transmission method can be as secure as walking into
>> my CPA's office and handing him papers.
In <201103091258.46708@iguanasuicide.net>, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>Similarly, if you engage a tax profess
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
> ...are the most secure way to exchange information publicly available.
I wrote:
> That statement is certainly false on its face. No electronic
> transmission method can be as secure as walking into my CPA's office
> and handing him papers.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On 2011-03-09 16:11:47 John Hasler wrote:
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
>> ...are the most secure way to exchange information publicly available.
>
>That statement is certainly false on its face. No electronic
>transmission method can be as secure as walking into my CPA's office and
>handing him
I wrote:
> ...the Web is inherently insecure.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
> Well, that statement is false on it's face.
History disagrees with you.
> Properly implemented TLS trust chains...
Some probably exist, somewhere. They do not include Verisign.
> ...are the most secure way to exch
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 13:10 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >>
> >> Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
> >>
> >
> > I'm able to fill form fields and save values with v 9.4.
> >
> >
>
> Yes, but is this the Debian acroread v.9.4 or Adobe's v.9.4?
>
Adobe's
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On 2011-03-09 13:44:32 John Hasler wrote:
>I wrote:
>> Sure, if you don't mind publishing your tax returns.
>
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
>> "Publishing" is perhaps a bit harsh. Most web-based tax services use
>> end-to- end encryption to prevent the data from being intercepted both
>> times i
On 03/09/2011 11:55 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:10:55 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
Do you have any URI that we can test?
Yes, get form 1040 from here: http://www.irs.gov/ It's the
From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:58:41 -0600
> Most web-based tax services use end-to-
> end encryption to prevent the data from being intercepted both times it is
> "on
> the wire": from you to them and from them to the IRS.
True in Canada also. Revenue Canada qual
I wrote:
> Sure, if you don't mind publishing your tax returns.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
> "Publishing" is perhaps a bit harsh. Most web-based tax services use
> end-to- end encryption to prevent the data from being intercepted both
> times it is "on the wire": from you to them and from the
didn't try
Okular, Evince, or any of my other installed PDF viewers. I also have
no idea what might be wrong, but at least you know it works for others
with 9.4.2.
This is the acroread 9.4.2 from debian-multimedia?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Eric Morey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:31 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
On 2011-03-09 11:10:39 John Hasler wrote:
>Peter E. writes:
>> Isn't a Web based tax calculation more efficient?
>
>Sure, if you don't mind publishing your tax returns.
"Publishing" is perhaps a bit harsh. Most web-based tax services use end-to-
end encryption to prevent the data from being inter
gt;> Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
> >>>>
> >>>> This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
> >>>> debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
> >>>>
) from
debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
properties say "fillable".
Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
Do you have any URI that we can test?
Yes, get form 1040 from here: http://www.irs.gov/
It's the first PDF on the top lefth
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 06:31:48 am Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
>
> This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
> debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the doc
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:10:55 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
Do you have any URI that we can test?
Yes, get form 1040 from here: http://www.irs.gov/ It's the first PDF on
the top lefthand side. On my syste
nd installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
> >> debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
> >> properties say "fillable".
> >>
> >> Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
> >
> > Do you have any URI that
Peter E. writes:
> Isn't a Web based tax calculation more efficient?
Sure, if you don't mind publishing your tax returns.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:49:18 -0800, peasthope wrote:
> From: Camaleon
> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:34:41 + (UTC)
>> Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny) ... I'm not sure
>> if it's okay with just filling the data and then print it or sending
>> the file via e-mail or by direct
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:41:23 -0500, Eric Morey wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 16:34 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny)
>
> I was not able to save values in the form fields with evince. Only with
> acroread v 9.4.
No? Weird, I can :-? (evince 2.22.2
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:10:55 -0600
Hugo Vanwoerkom dijo:
>>> Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
>> Do you have any URI that we can test?
>Yes, get form 1040 from here: http://www.irs.gov/
I had no trouble using Adobe Reader 9.4.2 on 64-bit Linux. I didn't try
Okular, Evince,
From: Camaleon
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:34:41 + (UTC)
> Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny) ...
> I'm not sure if it's okay with just filling the data
> and then print it or sending the file via e-mail or by direct upload.
Isn't a Web based tax calculation more efficie
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:31 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
>
> This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
> debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 16:34 +, Camaleón wrote:
> Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny)
I was not able to save values in the form fields with evince. Only with
acroread v 9.4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:10:55 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>>> Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
>>
>> Do you have any URI that we can test?
>>
>>
> Yes, get form 1040 from here: http://www.irs.gov/ It's the first PDF on
> the top lefthand side. On my syste
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:31:48 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
properties say
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:31:48 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
>
> This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
> debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
>
Hi,
Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
properties say "fillable".
Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 08:58:59 -0800, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> 22/02/2011 :
> Finaly I'm trying to restore Oldstable/Lenny. Should be finished tonigth
> or tomorrow. Sorry
Thanks for the heads-up :-)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 01 March 2011 16:58:59 Jimmy Johnson wrote:
22/02/2011 :
Finaly I'm trying to restore Oldstable/Lenny.
Should be finished tonigth or tomorrow.
Sorry
Thanks for the work, Jimmy. I look forward to uncommenting my multimedia
sources!
Lisi if you want you can think me
On Tuesday 01 March 2011 16:58:59 Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> 22/02/2011 :
> Finaly I'm trying to restore Oldstable/Lenny.
> Should be finished tonigth or tomorrow.
> Sorry
Thanks for the work, Jimmy. I look forward to uncommenting my multimedia
sources!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-us
22/02/2011 :
Finaly I'm trying to restore Oldstable/Lenny.
Should be finished tonigth or tomorrow.
Sorry
--
Jimmy Johnson
SimplyMEPIS 11.0 Beta-2 at sda12
Registered Linux User #380263
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Based on these assumptions:
1. I'm going to take a guess that the owner of Debian Multimedia is not
interested in serving lenny files any more (this, of course, could be wrong).
2. There is interest in being able to access the Lenny files that were stored
at the DM site.
A proposal:
A
Hi,
I use debian unstable, and as such I never worried much about
/etc/apt/preferences (well /etc/apt/preferences.d/* are not recognized
by aptitude as of now), so I always had a misxture of official debian
packages, the ones coming from debian-multimedia, and debian
unofficial ones.
Yesterday
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> The subject says it all. There was a hard disk crash. All (except mailing
> lists) is restored. Check it out.
excellent, great to hear.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
The subject says it all. There was a hard disk crash. All (except mailing
lists) is restored. Check it out.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010061
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 00:57:49 +0200, Clive McBarton wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:08:23 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> >> Clive McBarton writes:
> >>> The debian-multimedia-keyring is not restricted by patents or any
> >>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:08:23 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
>> Clive McBarton writes:
>>> The debian-multimedia-keyring is not restricted by patents or any
>>> other licence issues. I understand why
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:08:23 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Clive McBarton writes:
> > The debian-multimedia-keyring is not restricted by patents or any
> > other licence issues. I understand why the other d-m packages are not
> > in debian, but the keyring (and just the
Clive McBarton writes:
> The debian-multimedia-keyring is not restricted by patents or any
> other licence issues. I understand why the other d-m packages are not
> in debian, but the keyring (and just the keyring) should be in debian.
Debian-multimedia is not part of Debian,
--
Jo
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:00:11AM +0200, Clive McBarton wrote:
> I understand that point of view. But it is a point of view that will
> make people stay away from d-m (and pretty much all other repos for that
> matter).
So? If there is a problem with another repo infecting your system, the
best a
> Clive McBarton :
>> I also have been using debian-multimedia for LAME mp3 and am very
>> thankful for its existence.
>
>Yes, it's useful for that. Though if it's just lame, it's probably
>simpler to compile the source than to add a repo.
- apt-get o
their repository.
> >>
> >> I'm curious if many people use debian-multimedia. Is it trustworthy?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I have been using debian-multimedia with Debian stable for years without
> > any problems. It is a vauluable and reliable servic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Ianson wrote:
> Clive McBarton wrote:
>> It would help a lot if the key of d-m (package
>> debian-multimedia-keyring) was in the debian repos, not just the d-m
repos.
>
> All the stuff at debian-multimedia can't
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 20:34 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Alan Ianson writes:
> > All the stuff at debian-multimedia can't be included in debian for
> > various reasons, mostly freedom I think, so you won't find it in
> > debian at all. It's made for debian but
Alan Ianson writes:
> All the stuff at debian-multimedia can't be included in debian for
> various reasons, mostly freedom I think, so you won't find it in
> debian at all. It's made for debian but it isn't debian.
Most of it is Free Software but encumbered by activ
ng to
> >> debian-multimedia.org? Anything to establish a chain of trust. As it is,
> >> I looked and looked but didn't find. Even when searching for
> >> "multimedia" on debian.org, it does not mention debian-multimedia.org at
> >> all. Not
On 2010-04-19 17:00, Clive McBarton wrote:
[snip]
I understand that point of view. But it is a point of view that will
make people stay away from d-m (and pretty much all other repos for that
matter).
It would help a lot if the key of d-m (package
debian-multimedia-keyring) was in the debian
I looked and looked but didn't find. Even when searching for
>> "multimedia" on debian.org, it does not mention debian-multimedia.org at
>> all. Not even when searching for "debian-multimedia". Every new debian
>> user trying to verify the credibilit
oes not mention debian-multimedia.org at
all. Not even when searching for "debian-multimedia". Every new debian
user trying to verify the credibilitiy of debian-multimedia.org would
have given up at this point for sure.
Google is pretty darned ubiquitous, and has been for 8+ years.
Puttin
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Clive McBarton wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Can you check your installed version of libavcodec51? That's one of the
> things which d-m modifies.
>
Unfortunately, it is not my machine and I don't have access to it for a
while. I only had the machine for a short while which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Liam O'Toole wrote:
>> Adding debian-multimedia.org breaks a couple of things. Including vlc. I
>> don't know why they don't fix their repository.
>>
>> I'm curious if many people use debian-multimedia. Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark wrote:
> I also have been using debian-multimedia for LAME mp3 and am very thankful
> for its existence.
Yes, it's useful for that. Though if it's just lame, it's probably
simpler to compile the source than to add a repo.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
> I have been using debian-multimedia with Debian stable for years without
> any problems. It is a vauluable and reliable service, and is provided by
> a well-known Debian developer.
>
> To the OP: do you have an exam
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 11:01 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 06:10 +0200, Clive McBarton wrote:
>
> > > I have confirmed one of the Smart Upgrades contained in debian-multimedia
> > > on
> > > Lenny does in fact cause this Fatal Error. I rei
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 06:10 +0200, Clive McBarton wrote:
> > I have confirmed one of the Smart Upgrades contained in debian-multimedia on
> > Lenny does in fact cause this Fatal Error. I reinstalled Lenny on the same
> > machine tonight, without adding debian-multimedia to /et
v files fine I'm suspecting this. I've tried various tweaks I
>>> found on-line to the /etc/mplayer/mplayer.conf file for the vo section but
>>> nothing worked. I'll be re-doing the installation for a friend and wanted
>>> to avoid breaking mplayer if possib
. I've tried various tweaks I
>> found on-line to the /etc/mplayer/mplayer.conf file for the vo section but
>> nothing worked. I'll be re-doing the installation for a friend and wanted
>> to avoid breaking mplayer if possible.
>>
>
>
> I have confirm
or the vo section but
> nothing worked. I'll be re-doing the installation for a friend and wanted
> to avoid breaking mplayer if possible.
>
I have confirmed one of the Smart Upgrades contained in debian-multimedia on
Lenny does in fact cause this Fatal Error. I reinstalled Lenny
Has anyone else experienced mplayer generating Fatal Error "Error
opening/initializing the selected video_out (-vo) device" after adding
debian-multimedia.org to sources.list and performing the subsequent Smart
Upgrades? I'm trying to figure out if that's the cause; since other
machines I have wit
Stuckey wrote:
Quoting Chris Bannister :
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:15:38PM +0100, Stuckey wrote:
Is it still necessary for me to set a target release? How do I do this?
Please!. Don't top post on this list.
<<< SNIP >>>
Thanks. I'll remember not to top post.
And also remember to t
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
