Re: Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

2006-05-08 Thread charles norwood
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:13 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:38:07PM +0300, David Baron wrote: > > Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and > > leave the others. A lot quicker SNIP > As for the time 'saved', while the compile is chugging

Re: Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

2006-05-07 Thread Jochen Schulz
David Baron: > > Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and > leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not > used! A good idea. > How do I know what to change from "m" to "no"? If it does not appear on lsmod? It depends. For hardwa

Re: Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

2006-05-07 Thread Digby Tarvin
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:13:57AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:38:07PM +0300, David Baron wrote: > > Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and > > leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not > > used! >

Re: Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

2006-05-07 Thread Paul E Condon
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:38:07PM +0300, David Baron wrote: > Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and > leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not > used! > > How do I know what to change from "m" to "no"? If it does not appear

Custom Kernel Build -- All Those Modules

2006-05-07 Thread David Baron
Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not used! How do I know what to change from "m" to "no"? If it does not appear on lsmod? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub