On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:49:35AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> And I find myself puzzling over whether re-cycling a password by running it
> through an encryption device and using the encryption result as the new
> password is better or worse than using a random password generator.
>
> Obviously, sy
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Chris Bannister <
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:26:17PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> >
> > Do you mean actually recycled? Or are you thinking of one-time pads?
>
> Not really.
>
> Umm, what about:
> http://www.logicalsecurity.com/res
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:26:17PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>
> Do you mean actually recycled? Or are you thinking of one-time pads?
Not really.
Umm, what about:
http://www.logicalsecurity.com/resources/whitepapers/Cryptography.pdf
"... We'll cite two kinds of rotation ciphering machines: the Je
Chris Bannister writes:
> My guess is that they were actually rotated at some point but when
> that changed, the name was not.
People wrote about rotating passwords decades ago but they didn't really
mean it then either.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Chris Bannister <
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 09:16:50PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <
> > > Switching to a new one and disposing of the older one is, for whatever
> > >
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 09:16:50PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <
> > Switching to a new one and disposing of the older one is, for whatever
> > reason, usually called "rotating the keys".
>
> Probably because of perceived similarities to
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <
h...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2013, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > I intended the question to be answered in the context of the post by
> > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, where 'across security domains' is
> > considered less desir
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I intended the question to be answered in the context of the post by
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, where 'across security domains' is
> considered less desirable than 'across hosts'. I know what hosts are
> when writing computer stuff, but, come to think
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Glenn English wrote:
>
> NSA.com?
>
Did you mean nsa.gov?
nsa.com site is a shipping company.
--
Arun Khan
Sent from my non-iphone/non-android device
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On 20130727_172641, Glenn English wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 27 July 2013 23:27:40 Paul E Condon wrote:
> >> I'm lurking here, hoping to learn things:
> >> In this case, what is a 'security domain'?
> >> Don't make fun of me. I really haven't, to
Thanks for the amusing responses.
With our new knowledge of who actually reads our emails, rules for
cycling passwords have lost pride of place in a ranking of
things-to-worry-about.
I intended the question to be answered in the context of the post by
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, where 'across
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013, Paul E Condon wrote:
> In this case, what is a 'security domain'?
It is a partition or a group (actually, a "set"). When you have several
services/hosts that have different attributes from an information
security[1] perspective, you should place them in different partitions
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 17:26 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 27 July 2013 23:27:40 Paul E Condon wrote:
> >> I'm lurking here, hoping to learn things:
> >> In this case, what is a 'security domain'?
> >> Don't make fun of me. I really
On Jul 27, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 27 July 2013 23:27:40 Paul E Condon wrote:
>> I'm lurking here, hoping to learn things:
>> In this case, what is a 'security domain'?
>> Don't make fun of me. I really haven't, to my memory, come across the
>> term, before.
>
> I'd l
On Saturday 27 July 2013 23:27:40 Paul E Condon wrote:
> I'm lurking here, hoping to learn things:
> In this case, what is a 'security domain'?
> Don't make fun of me. I really haven't, to my memory, come across the
> term, before.
I'd like to know what a security domain is too. So I can join y
On 20130727_140629, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2013, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 27 Jul 2013 at 12:05:05 +0300, Lars Noodén wrote:
> > > On 07/26/2013 11:26 PM, Brian wrote:
> > > > Does this 'good idea' have reasons to support it?
> > >
> > > It is for much the same reasons t
16 matches
Mail list logo
