Given all the talk about conspiracy theories, it occurs to be to point
out this statement by none other than Lennart Poettering
(http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
on 9/1/2014) in a blog post titled "Revisiting How We Put Together Linux
Systems&quo
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 20:08 -0700, Weaver wrote:
> I believe elections are coming up for DPL soon, Mark, if you want to chuck
> your hat into the ring, you could well save us from both Santa Claus and
> Larry Page.
Is this just a joke or is Lawrence Page being discussed to become Debian
project le
e
> carrying their presents in a sleigh pulled by reindeer, you can assume
> that is only the first of many conspiracy's that you will encounter in
> your life. While the fanatics rave about there being no conspiracies.
> Our society is a conspiracy. How dare we have a constitution t
assume
that is only the first of many conspiracy's that you will encounter in
your life. While the fanatics rave about there being no conspiracies.
Our society is a conspiracy. How dare we have a constitution that
guarantees the right to individual freedom of expression in a world
controll
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:58:22 -0600, Nathan E Norman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:39:32AM +, Pigeon wrote:
>> OK, but what about the hard drive? In both cases the head has to track
>> over the preceding sectors and switch into write mode when it gets to
>> the right se
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:39:32AM +, Pigeon wrote:
> OK, but what about the hard drive? In both cases the head has to track
> over the preceding sectors and switch into write mode when it gets to
> the right sector to be written. OK, so one's magnetic, one's optical,
> but the head servos are
On 22 Nov 2002 15:42:17 +0100, Stefan Janecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 23:37, Pigeon wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:55:41 -0800, Vineet Kumar
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >This is exactly what burnproof does. You can load the machine; you can
>> >deplete the buf
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 23:37, Pigeon wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:55:41 -0800, Vineet Kumar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >This is exactly what burnproof does. You can load the machine; you can
> >deplete the buffer. Rather than spewing the contents of the empty
> >buffer to the disc (creat
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:55:41 -0800, Vineet Kumar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is exactly what burnproof does. You can load the machine; you can
>deplete the buffer. Rather than spewing the contents of the empty
>buffer to the disc (creating a coaster), it suspends the write and
>resumes when
On 09 Apr 1998 13:15:21 EDT, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Products that are DFSG compliant are Open Source compliant, and vice
> versa. It's two names for the same thing. Suits understand `Open
> Source' better than they understand `Free Software'; they have a
> suspicion of anything that has `Free' in th
To clarify, RedHat is DFSG-compliant (it's listed in Open Source
products), and Debian is Open Source-compliant (Open Source definition
is DFSG), but because DFSG targets non-commercial software (ironically
the same software that appears on commercial Linux distros) and Open
Sour
On 09 Apr 1998 10:35:20 EDT, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are the terms "DFSG" and "Open Source" completely interchangeable or
> not? They're based on identical wording.
>
> Yes, they are, AFAIK.
On the one hand that's nice because it's completely interchangeable, on
the other hand two names fo
Hi,
Are the terms "DFSG" and "Open Source" completely interchangeable or
not? They're based on identical wording.
Yes, they are, AFAIK.
http://www.opensource.org/osd.html
http://www.debian.org/social_contract.html#guidelines
What's the relationship between Debian and Ope
ource.org/products.html
http://www.opensource.org/history.html
Another Eric conspiracy ? :)
--
David Stern
--
http://weber.u.washington.edu/~kotsya
14 matches
Mail list logo
