Re: Confessions of a reluctant port scanner

2003-07-14 Thread Patrick Albuquerque
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 07:42:29PM -0700, Bruce Banner wrote: > It doesn't look like anything to worry about they are > false positives leaving your network. Your network is > a private network 192.168.1.x and the false attacks > are you hitting a dns probably your dns and your > network hitting a

Re: Confessions of a reluctant port scanner

2003-07-13 Thread Bruce Banner
Also, the target IP is slashdot's ip... --- Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't look like anything to worry about they > are > false positives leaving your network. Your network > is > a private network 192.168.1.x and the false attacks > are you hitting a dns probably your dns an

Re: Confessions of a reluctant port scanner

2003-07-13 Thread Bruce Banner
It doesn't look like anything to worry about they are false positives leaving your network. Your network is a private network 192.168.1.x and the false attacks are you hitting a dns probably your dns and your network hitting a website. 192.168.1 is a private network range that means they are unro

Confessions of a reluctant port scanner

2003-07-13 Thread Patrick Albuquerque
Hello, Anyone have an idea why I'm a portscanner? I'm running unstable, dsl thru a router. Some sample snort output: [**] [117:1:1] (spp_portscan2) Portscan detected from 192.168.1.1: 6 targets 6 ports in 19 seconds [**] 07/13-15:11:32.418841 192.168.1.1:32769 -> 198.32.64.12:53 UDP TTL:64 TOS:0