Hi,
I want to install nginx from source (latest unstable 0.8.13), using
checkinstall to create a .deb. I also want to use Debian's latest
nginx package (0.7.61) to add the man-pages, init scripts and what
not.
I've done this the past couple of times but lately i've been having
issues with php-cgi
That's exactly what I was looking for! Thank you so much.
Amit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I've recently been compiling a few programs from source. I then realized
> that I might have to uninstall them in the future. Thus, I did a quick
> google search and the main point was that after compiling create a .deb
> file and then install the sof
On Mon Sep 03, 2007 at 07:04:43 +, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> I've recently been compiling a few programs from source. I then realized that
> I
> might have to uninstall them in the future. Thus, I did a quick google search
> and the main point was that after compiling create a .deb file and
Hey everyone,
I've recently been compiling a few programs from source. I then realized that I
might have to uninstall them in the future. Thus, I did a quick google search
and the main point was that after compiling create a .deb file and then install
the software. Then I could just use dpkg to in
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:55:37PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm used to work with php for creating dynamic webpages.
> I want to try to make shell scripts with it too and the 4.3.0
> version is able to do this. I know php already a bit and
I'm fairly sure that PHP has been abl
Hello,
i'm used to work with php for creating dynamic webpages.
I want to try to make shell scripts with it too and the 4.3.0
version is able to do this. I know php already a bit and
don't want to learn perl script so that's the reason why i want
to go with php. That and the fact that i like c++.
Just wanted to say thanks to all that replied. I probably wont compile
from source unless I find myself very bored(and with plenty disk space)
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 12:25, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Firstly, let me apologize for the off-topic post.
>
> I am considering compiling some so
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 11:26:57AM -0200, Klaus Imgrund wrote:
> No - useing gcc 2.95 instead of 3.2 speeds it up.
Other way round. GCC 3.2 is supposed to be a huge improvement over 2.95
(at run time, anyhow).
-rob
msg12333/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:25:57PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> 1. How easy is it to set something up so a group of packages get
> automatically compiled (with some preset flags for optimization).
Setting CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS will work for 99% of programs. Maybe
apt-build is worth a look?
> 2.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:25:57 +
Shri Shrikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. How easy is it to set something up so a group of packages get
> automatically compiled (with some preset flags for optimization).
I wouldn't do that - some apps and drivers don't work anymore with
certain flags.You
Hi,
* Shri Shrikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-11-10 13:25]:
>1. How easy is it to set something up so a group of packages get
>automatically compiled (with some preset flags for optimization).
With Gentoo - easy. With Debian it would take probably much longer
than you can ever hope to save later.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:25:57PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> 2. Which all packages are the prime candidates. Presumably XFree86 is a
> candidate - what about libc and suchlike. I already compile the kernel.
> Would compiling gcc speed up compiling ?
The kernel and any movie-specific stuff see
Hi All,
Firstly, let me apologize for the off-topic post.
I am considering compiling some software with optimizations to try to
speed up my machine. I considered going to something like gentoo but
would rather not *have to* compile all software.
My questions are.
1. How easy is it to set someth
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 10:47:01PM +, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> PS - off topic here but vim is not text wrapping within mutt. sorry
> its all over the place - would someone using vim with mutt please be
> so kind as to send me the relevant line from .muttrc to get the tw
> correct.
put something
This may be what you're looking for.
- Forwarded message from Nick Croft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:53:14 +1100
Subject: Re: Vim in mutt (was: Re: Compiling from source)
From: Nick Croft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:19:42PM +1300, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>> [Compile from source]
>>
>> Question: does this really improve performance?
>
>A little. How much depends on the package. Remember that maintainers will
>compile with -O2 and othe
Many thanks. It looks awful as I enter it yet comes out fine when I send it.
I'll read up on this during soem idle moment ;-)
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 10:47:01PM +, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [big snip]
>
> PS - off topic here but vim is not text wrapping within mutt. sorry
> its all over the place - would someone using vim with mutt please be
> so kind as to send me the relevant line from .muttrc to get the tw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> [Compile from source]
>
> Question: does this really improve performance?
A little. How much depends on the package. Remember that maintainers will
compile with -O2 and other optimisations, so all you gain is arch specific
optimisations. For som
Hi all,
I decide to try a new distro as the win2k partition of my machine was just
sitting there. I had read articles by Daniel Robbins and decided to try Gentoo
on www.gentoo.com. cfdisk and goodbye win2k...pity in a way because I still
think its the best OS ever produced by M$. anyway, bac
On 29 Jan 2002, Andre Berger wrote:
> Here's what I've done to compile Vim 6.0.152 for potato as .deb:
>
> - download tarball and patches from ftp.vim.org, untar and apply
> the patches
> - rename the directory to vim-6.0 and cd into it
> - $ deb-make
> (single binary)
> - edit de
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
On Ter, 2002-01-29 at 12:41, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who replied. Compiling debian source seems to be
> quite a bit simpler than the last time I tried it. Unfortunately the
> latest vim source (vim_6.0.118) won't compile for me, and the deb
> package doesn't have gui compiled
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 02:41:42PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone who replied. Compiling debian source seems to be
> quite a bit simpler than the last time I tried it. Unfortunately the
> latest vim source (vim_6.0.118) won't compile for me
> [[rest of mail snipped]]
Make
On 29 Jan 2002, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:24:46AM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > I've downloaded the vim source tarball from the debian site but how do I
> > compile this as a deb package? Where are the relevant debian files for
> > doing this?
>
> if you did apt-ge
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:24:46AM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I've downloaded the vim source tarball from the debian site but how do I
> compile this as a deb package? Where are the relevant debian files for
> doing this?
if you did apt-get source vim you have a directory called vim-
if y
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:24:46AM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I've downloaded the vim source tarball from the debian site but how do I
> compile this as a deb package? Where are the relevant debian files for
> doing this?
You will also need the diff.gz and dsc files. Two sources which may
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:24:46AM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I've downloaded the vim source tarball from the debian site but how do I
> compile this as a deb package? Where are the relevant debian files for
> doing this?
'apt-get source vim'
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
I've downloaded the vim source tarball from the debian site but how do I
compile this as a deb package? Where are the relevant debian files for
doing this?
--
Anthony Campbell - running Linux GNU/Debian (Windows-free zone)
For an electronic book (The Assassins of Alamut), skeptical
essays, and
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:13:36PM +1000, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> > I would think upgrading to GNOME 1.2.0 would be a pain with potato but I
> > might be wrong. Someone may have built a package for stable. Check the
> > archives. Someone else might chip in with the way to do this.
> >
Christophe
> You need the libpanel-applet (and dev) package.
> The configure give a false impression : when everything goes right you can
> see somthing like :
> checking for additional GNOME modules... vfs applet
> but when a modules is not present the uotput is more than confusing.
That did it
You need the libpanel-applet (and dev) package.
The configure give a false impression : when everything goes right you can
see somthing like :
checking for additional GNOME modules... vfs applet
but when a modules is not present the uotput is more than confusing.
If you want you can use my debian
> I would think upgrading to GNOME 1.2.0 would be a pain with potato but I
> might be wrong. Someone may have built a package for stable. Check the
> archives. Someone else might chip in with the way to do this.
> hth,
> kent
Kent,
> > I'm running Debian unstable, kernel 2.4.4,, using the S3 X
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 01:40:01PM +1000, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> I'm attempting to get the Galeon source compiled (acquired from the
> sourceforge ftp server), but ./configure fails with this message:
>
> checking for GNOME - version >= 1.2.0... yes
> checking for additional
I'm attempting to get the Galeon source compiled (acquired from the
sourceforge ftp server), but ./configure fails with this message:
checking for GNOME - version >= 1.2.0... yes
checking for additional GNOME modules... vfs*** applets library is not
installed
confi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Alexander) wrote:
>Hello all. New to Debian, and have a few questions. When installing
>software from source: what is the official/suggested way of doing this in
>Debian? Obviously, /usr/local is under my control according to the FHS.
>But is there a suggested way of hand
Hello all. New to Debian, and have a few questions. When installing
software from source: what is the official/suggested way of doing this in
Debian? Obviously, /usr/local is under my control according to the FHS.
But is there a suggested way of handling this on a Debian system? Also,
does it
38 matches
Mail list logo
