Hi, Sven.
On Friday, 25 December 2009 09:53:53 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
> > Sorry to send this message twice, but I thought that for some reason
> > it had not arrived at the list. Although it seems that both messages
> > arrived with a delay of six hours. This can be due to some
> > moderation
On 2009-12-25 07:55 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Sorry to send this message twice, but I thought that for some reason it
> had not arrived at the list. Although it seems that both messages
> arrived with a delay of six hours. This can be due to some moderation of
> the list?
This list is not mo
Sorry to send this message twice, but I thought that for some reason it
had not arrived at the list. Although it seems that both messages
arrived with a delay of six hours. This can be due to some moderation of
the list?
On Thursday, 24 December 2009 09:45:54 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> > > b
Hi, Sven.
On Wednesday, 23 December 2009 11:19:26 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
> > b) Debian way compilation:
> >
> > b.1) Having booted an i386 kernel and userland 32:
> >
> > # cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config
> >
> > # make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig
> >
> > # fakeroot make-kpkg clean --cross-co
On 2009-12-17 at 21:32:59 -300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org.
> Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian
> GNU/Linux repositories.
>
> In order to generate the configuration, I've copied the fil
On Wednesday, 23 December 2009 11:19:26 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
> > b) Debian way compilation:
> >
> > b.1) Having booted an i386 kernel and userland 32:
> >
> > # cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config
> >
> > # make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig
> >
> > # fakeroot make-kpkg clean --cross-compile - -ar
On 2009-12-23 11:07 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Reading [1] and [2], I already found the cause of this problem. The
> configuration in "Executable file formats / Emulations" must be the
> following one in order to use a kernel x86_64 in userland 32.
>
> [*] Kernel support for ELF binaries
> [ ]
On Saturday, 19 December 2009 16:19:31 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> > > I assume that it must have differences between both kernels
> > > versions; for that reason, as I've mentioned in another mail of
> > > this thread, after to have copied the file, I followed a similar
> > > procedure to whic
Hi, Sven.
On Friday, 18 December 2009 17:34:22 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
> > I was trying installing and booting 2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel and then
> > compiling 2.6.32 kernel of the traditional way:
> >
> > # cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.32
> > # cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config
> > # make menuconfig
On 2009-12-18 16:56 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I was trying installing and booting 2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel and then
> compiling 2.6.32 kernel of the traditional way:
>
> # cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.32
> # cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config
> # make menuconfig
> # make
>
> In this case I didn't use
Hi, Sven.
On Friday, 18 December 2009 09:15:43 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
> > I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of
> > kernel.org. Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of
> > the Debian GNU/Linux repositories.
> >
> > In order to generate the configuration,
On 2009-12-18 01:32 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org.
> Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian
> GNU/Linux repositories.
>
> In order to generate the configuration, I've copied the file
> corresponding
Dear Daniel,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:41:11PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
[snip menuconfig discussion]
> This only works in the case of not using ARCH=x86_64 with make
> menuconfig in the second time that is invoked. But when not using this
> variable, the processor family returns to be like Pe
Hi, Kumar.
On Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:34:09 -0600,
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:26:39PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> > > Well, the kernel build does check what your current config is, and
> > > based on that, asks you some new questions. One way I get around this
> >
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:26:39PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> > Well, the kernel build does check what your current config is, and
> > based on that, asks you some new questions. One way I get around this
> > is:
> >
> > cd
> > cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config
> > make menuconfig # choose
Hi, Kumar.
On Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:40:07 -0600,
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org.
> > Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian
> > GNU/Linux repositories.
> >
> > In order to generate the configurati
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:32:59PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org.
> Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian
> GNU/Linux repositories.
>
> In order to generate the configuration, I've copi
Hi all!
I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org.
Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian
GNU/Linux repositories.
In order to generate the configuration, I've copied the file
corresponding to this kernel to the directory of sources,
/usr/src
18 matches
Mail list logo
