I've used both (4.5 libc5, 4.51 glibc2) and haven't experienced any
difference. Both have there bugs of course.
kent
Sami Dalouche wrote:
>
> In one of their readmes, they theid the glibc2 version is less stable than
> their libc5 version of communicator/navigator.
> Have anyone tried the bot
In one of their readmes, they theid the glibc2 version is less stable than
their libc5 version of communicator/navigator.
Have anyone tried the both version and seen a difference ?
On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 01:35:17PM -0330, Greg Starkes wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Curt Daugaard wrote:
>
> > Does
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Curt Daugaard wrote:
> Does anyone know how in the dense thicket of the Netscape site I can
> locate a libc6 version of Communicator 4.5 (128 or 168 bit)?
It's under the unsupported unix section, so you can get the 128-bit from
their web site. The supported one is libc5, as yo
*- On 6 Mar, Curt Daugaard wrote about "Communicator 4.5 libc6 version"
> Does anyone know how in the dense thicket of the Netscape site I can
> locate a libc6 version of Communicator 4.5 (128 or 168 bit)?
>
> As always, any help much appreciated.
>
>
> C
Curt Daugaard wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how in the dense thicket of the Netscape site I can
> locate a libc6 version of Communicator 4.5 (128 or 168 bit)?
>
> As always, any help much appreciated.
Bob has told you where the file is, however the Netscape versions
from ftp.netscape.com
ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/communicator/4.5/english/unix/unsupported/linux20_glibc2/
Bob
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Curt Daugaard wrote:
> Does anyone know how in the dense thicket of the Netscape site I can
> locate a libc6 version of Communicator 4.5 (128 or 168 bit)?
>
> As always, any help much ap
Does anyone know how in the dense thicket of the Netscape site I can
locate a libc6 version of Communicator 4.5 (128 or 168 bit)?
As always, any help much appreciated.
Curt Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo
