On Thu, 08 Apr 2004, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> At 2004-04-08T03:04:46Z, Christian Schnobrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oh, and... everybody suggests chrony as a far superior and more stable
> > solution than ntpd.
For certain situations, yes. Chrony is much better for high latency,
inconstant
* Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040408 09:05]:
>
> I occasionally hear someone say that chrony is better than ntpd, but
> I've never heard the reasons why.
I tried setting up ntp and found it difficult, but tried setting up
chrony and found it easy. Since I'm just running a few boxes at h
At 2004-04-08T03:04:46Z, Christian Schnobrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, and... everybody suggests chrony as a far superior and more stable
> solution than ntpd.
More stable? In what way? Not once in the years that I've used ntpd have I
ever had problems with it.
I occasionally hear som
3 matches
Mail list logo
