On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:55:01PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
Is there a reason for Firefox not to use the certificates in
ca-certificates?
Maybe Firefox can’t read PEM files as CAs and it only knows its own
storing system? I don’t know. Maybe there was a problem with upstream not
allowing
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 15:34:46 +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:08:11PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>Still I am getting a question when visiting sites with certificates
>>issued by CACert.org such as http://wolfgang.lonien.de/
>
>So, this site uses the old class 1 certif
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:08:11PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
Still I am getting a question when visiting sites with certificates
issued by CACert.org such as http://wolfgang.lonien.de/
So, this site uses the old class 1 certificate.
After installing the ca certificate directly in firefox (f
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:08:11PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
As far as I can see ca-certificates includes the CACert.org certificate:
There are two CACert.org certificates. Debian includes the old class 1
pki certificate whice CACert suggests using the new class 3 pki
certificate.
This
As far as I can see ca-certificates includes the CACert.org certificate:
% dpkg -L ca-certificates|grep cacert
/usr/share/ca-certificates/cacert.org
/usr/share/ca-certificates/cacert.org/cacert.org.crt
Still I am getting a question when visiting sites with certificates
issued by CACert.org suc
5 matches
Mail list logo