Re: building 2.6.x kernel on Athlon

2005-07-19 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:30:49AM +0100, michael wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 21:40 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:29:29AM +0100, michael wrote: > > > fakeroot make-kpkg --append_to_version -486 --initrd \ > > > --revision=july2005 kernel_image > > > > > > is wha

Re: building 2.6.x kernel on Athlon

2005-07-19 Thread michael
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 21:40 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:29:29AM +0100, michael wrote: > > fakeroot make-kpkg --append_to_version -486 --initrd \ > > --revision=july2005 kernel_image > > > > is what I used (okay, erronous 's' in my retyping before) > > Cut/paste er

Re: building 2.6.x kernel on Athlon

2005-07-19 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:29:29AM +0100, michael wrote: > fakeroot make-kpkg --append_to_version -486 --initrd \ > --revision=july2005 kernel_image > > is what I used (okay, erronous 's' in my retyping before) Cut/paste error messages and commands, saves typing :-) -- Chris. == Reproduct

Re: building 2.6.x kernel on Athlon

2005-07-13 Thread michael
> On Tuesday 12 July 2005 15:36, linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > >> I was wondering if anybody has successfully built a 2.6.x kernel on an >> Athlon chip? > > Yes, I built one from Debian's 2.6.11-7 sources about three weeks ago, on > and for my Athlon. Since that time,

Re: building 2.6.x kernel on Athlon

2005-07-12 Thread Jules Dubois
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 15:36, linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > I was wondering if anybody has successfully built a 2.6.x kernel on an > Athlon chip? Yes, I built one from Debian's 2.6.11-7 sources about three weeks ago, on and for my Athlon. Since that time, a GCC upgrad

building 2.6.x kernel on Athlon

2005-07-12 Thread linux
I was wondering if anybody has successfully built a 2.6.x kernel on an Athlon chip? I've tried a couple of times but got errors (outline below) so was wondering if you could let me of any special requirements. I've not full details (now in Win to send this!) to hand but I started with, IIRC, 2.

Re: Building 2.6.x kernel

2004-07-23 Thread Silvan
> I have now built a 2.6.6 and a 2.6.7 using make_kpkg. Both have > apparently installed OK but panicked because they couldn't mount my > root partition. > > Said partition is an ext3 created during a stock sarge install. The > original 2.4.25 and an installed 2.6.6-1.k7 kernel have no problems.

Re: Building 2.6.x kernel

2004-07-23 Thread Micha Feigin
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 10:32:05AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Maybe my last message went astray. > > Has anyone had any success using a 2.6.[67] kernel built themselves? > Yes, several of them (2.6.8-rc2 currently). All using make-kpkg --revision kernel-image Note though that for some re

Re: Building 2.6.x kernel

2004-07-22 Thread Wayne Topa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Maybe my last message went astray. > > Has anyone had any success using a 2.6.[67] kernel built themselves? > Yes. Using the old fashoned way and using make-kpkg. : uname -a Linux buddy 2.6.7 #1 Sat Jul 17 21:15:34 EDT 2004 i686 G

Building 2.6.x kernel

2004-07-22 Thread dbarker
Maybe my last message went astray. Has anyone had any success using a 2.6.[67] kernel built themselves? I have now built a 2.6.6 and a 2.6.7 using make_kpkg. Both have apparently installed OK but panicked because they couldn't mount my root partition. Said partition is an ext3 created during a s