X-Y-GMX-multipart/mixed;
boundary="Add_By_Label_Mail_Nextpart_001"6
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
Resent-Message-ID:
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/573916
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
List-Id:
List-Post: <
On 2010-04-19 12:43 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Are bugs which are marked as done taken into account before a
> release?
Yes, they are.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
On 2010-04-12 12:55:59 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-04-12 12:21 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > Moreover, with the current status of module-init-tools, it seems
> > that the broken version will get into squeeze anyway (at least,
> > there doesn't seem to be anything to prevent that) if
On Mon,12.Apr.10, 11:19:54, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> There's something broken in the design of Debian's migration to testing.
>
> A grave bug in the testing version of module-init-tools (3.12~pre2-1)
> was fixed several weeks ago, and the package was uploaded with
> urgency=high:
>
> module-init
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:19:54 +0200
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Hello Vincent,
> module-init-tools (3.12~pre2-2) unstable; urgency=high
Migrated to testing today.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
A friend of a fri
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:07:08 -0400 (EDT), Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-04-12 11:19 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> There's something broken in the design of Debian's migration to testing.
>>
>> A grave bug in the testing version of module-init-tools (3.12~pre2-1)
>> was fixed several weeks ago, a
On 2010-04-12 12:21 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Moreover, with the current status of module-init-tools, it seems
> that the broken version will get into squeeze anyway (at least,
> there doesn't seem to be anything to prevent that) if the problem
> on HPPA isn't fixed.
There is something to p
On 2010-04-12 12:07:08 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> The conclusion I had drawn from this long ago: don't use testing, it is
> only meant to be a staging area for preparing the next release and not
> as a distribution actually to be used by people, except during freezes
> maybe.
The machine in ques
On 2010-04-12 11:19 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> There's something broken in the design of Debian's migration to testing.
>
> A grave bug in the testing version of module-init-tools (3.12~pre2-1)
> was fixed several weeks ago, and the package was uploaded with
> urgency=high:
>
> module-init-t
There's something broken in the design of Debian's migration to testing.
A grave bug in the testing version of module-init-tools (3.12~pre2-1)
was fixed several weeks ago, and the package was uploaded with
urgency=high:
module-init-tools (3.12~pre2-2) unstable; urgency=high
* Fixed an init
10 matches
Mail list logo
