Hello,
An updated jessie system here with bochs and bochs-sdl.
The system has a working PS/2 mouse. The ~/.bochsrc is
adjusted to boot from a floppy image.
Bochs is started from a console window and this is included
in the output.
000i[PLGIN] reset of 'speaker' plugin
Paul Johnson wrote the following on 04/11/2008 09:07 PM:
On Friday 11 April 2008 06:21:39 pm Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
I found bochs to be exceedingly difficult to use compared to other
alternatives, such as virtualbox-ose, which runs fantastically and is fairly
simple to use. Note that
On Saturday 12 April 2008 06:59:10 am Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
> Re: wine. It just doesn't seem to work too well for me.
> And when I look at the web page it looks like it is
> concentrated on gaming rather than real work.
It's worth trying both, the only reason the appdb is so gaming-heavy is
bec
Paul Johnson wrote the following on 04/11/2008 09:07 PM:
On Friday 11 April 2008 06:21:39 pm Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Greetings,
Just stumbled over some software known as Bochs. It
sounds as if I could install that on my Debian 4.0
system and then be able to run Win 2k as needed in a
"part
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:21:39PM -0500, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
> Is Bochs fast enough to be practical?
about 8 years ago I have seen a install process of windows 95 that
needed more than 8 hours to complete on a pentium 166 with debian and
bochs. So I expect bochs to be at least 10 times slo
On Friday 11 April 2008 06:21:39 pm Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Just stumbled over some software known as Bochs. It
> sounds as if I could install that on my Debian 4.0
> system and then be able to run Win 2k as needed in a
> "partition" when needed.
&g
Greetings,
Just stumbled over some software known as Bochs. It
sounds as if I could install that on my Debian 4.0
system and then be able to run Win 2k as needed in a
"partition" when needed.
Is Bochs fast enough to be practical? I have a P4,
1.5GB mem. What I do right now is u
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:55:29PM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
Qemu segfaults on me, but I've been able to get bochs (the upstream
version - 2.2.1-0) to work reliably (very much slower than qemu) and
the bochs TUNTAP finally works! :-)
Ho
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:55:29PM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Steve Kemp wrote:
>
> > Qemu is very usable and simple to install Windows upon, albeit a little
> >slow.
>
> Qemu segfaults on me, but I've been able to get bochs (the upstream
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Steve Kemp wrote:
Qemu is very usable and simple to install Windows upon, albeit a little
slow.
Qemu segfaults on me, but I've been able to get bochs (the upstream
version - 2.2.1-0) to work reliably (very much slower than qemu) and
the bochs TUNTAP finally
Qemu is very usable and simple to install Windows upon, albeit a little
slow.
The following page is a quick walk-through of installing Windows 2000
upon Qemu:
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/40
I use it infrequently, but it's nice to have available.
Steve
--
# The
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:22:10PM -0500, Jim Hall wrote:
Does anyone have experience with Bochs? Can I actually install it, then W98se,
then the software I need to have running with minimum hassle? And yes, I know
that's a very broad question. But I need to
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:22:10PM -0500, Jim Hall wrote:
> Does anyone have experience with Bochs? Can I actually install it, then
> W98se,
> then the software I need to have running with minimum hassle? And yes, I know
> that's a very broad question. But I need to start s
On 7/25/05, Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have experience with Bochs? Can I actually install it, then
> W98se, then the software I need to have running with minimum hassle? And
> yes, I know that's a very broad question. But I need to start somewhere.
I t
Does anyone have experience with Bochs? Can I actually install it, then
W98se, then the software I need to have running with minimum hassle? And
yes, I know that's a very broad question. But I need to start somewhere.
Jim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Dear all,
I am trying to install Win 2000 in Bochs 2.1.1. using image of w2k
installation CD and flat HD image of 1 GB. At the point when w2k setup
says "Setup starts Windows 2000" Bochs simulation stops (message box:
"Bochs simulation has stopped"). Is there some ex
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 04:39:16PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> I am also trying out bochs. After creating a bximage (flat file) and
> copying the line indicated by bximage to /etc/bochs-init/bochsrc the
> following happened when I tried bochs:
[...]
> Please choose one: [2] 5
&g
I am also trying out bochs. After creating a bximage (flat file) and
copying the line indicated by bximage to /etc/bochs-init/bochsrc the
following happened when I tried bochs:
You can also start bochs with the -q option to skip these menus.
1. Restore factory default configuration
2. Read
Hello,
I installed bochs/testing but i can't install plex86 with bochs. Is plex86 makes bochs
runs fast?
Can i install plex86 with kernel 2.4.18bf24?
[]'s
Sávio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I installed bochs/testing and after that installed win98SE.
1) if i do apt-get -t unstable install bochs, bochs will be upgrade but, it will
remove win98 that i installed before?
2) bochs/unstable is really better than bochs/testing? What is the advantage?
[]'s
Sávio.
Hello,
I installed bochs/testing, run bochsconf and fire bochs. The message above appear:
Context: [ ]
Message: dlopen failde for module 'extfpuirq': file not found
What can I do? Any help?
Thanks,
Sávio Ramos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Hello,
I instaled plex86 and bochs of Sid.
Following the instructions of bochs I create a c.img and run bochs.
This message appear "failed to open plex86 device".
Anyone can help me?
Thanks
Sávio Ramos.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Hi all,
Has anyone got bochs running 98SE on debian ?
It boots, bios window AOK, starts 98SE with the splash screen, blue ribbon at
bottom scrolls sideways AOK, then ribbon stops and zip !
It wont load any further, no error messages from bochs, top reports a lot of
cpu and memory useage
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:22:45 -0400 Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I assume that your quest continues? :-}
Yea, nothing firm yet. Having some difficulties with configuring it. I'll
try more this weekend, got caught up in a few projects for work.
--
Jamin W. Collins
--
To UNS
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:42:27PM -0500, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:42:29 -0400 Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So who's the brave soul who's managed to run another OS on plex86? How
> > easy has it been?
>
> I'll be finding out in the next few days, possibly t
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:42:29 -0400 Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So who's the brave soul who's managed to run another OS on plex86? How
> easy has it been?
I'll be finding out in the next few days, possibly tonight.
--
Jamin W. Collins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:27:34AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I stand corrected.
>
> Citations help. From the Plex86 information page:
>
> http://www.plex86.org/info.phtml
>
> What is Plex86?
>
> The goal of the Plex86 p
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > > > Bochs emulates individual machine instructions in software. VMware lets
> > > > the processor handle those as normal, but traps accesses to hardware
> > > > devices and emulates just those in software.
> > >
> > &g
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:10:51AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Wed, Sep 25, 2002, Leandro Guimar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Em Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:23 +0100,
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > > Bochs emulates individual machine instruc
Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:07:27PM -0700, nate wrote:
> > > > > some may even require use of vmware/bochs/etc to run ..
> > > >
> > > > Is bochs anywhere near as user-friendly as vmware yet?
> > >
> > > Bo
e:
> > > > some may even require use of vmware/bochs/etc to run ..
> > >
> > > Is bochs anywhere near as user-friendly as vmware yet?
> >
> > Bochs is described as a PC emulator, while vmware is virtual
> > machine software. I don't know the difference
Vmware let's you run an operating system compiled
for i386 (intel) on i386. It only simulates an interface
to the hardware. So that you can run windows for i386 on
linux for i386. While bochs actually emulates the i386 so
that you can run windows for i386 on something like a
sun sparc.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:29:57PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:21:36AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:07:27PM -0700, nate wrote:
> > > some may even require use of vmware/bochs/etc to run ..
> >
> > Is bochs any
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:21:36AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:07:27PM -0700, nate wrote:
> > some may even require use of vmware/bochs/etc to run ..
>
> Is bochs anywhere near as user-friendly as vmware yet?
Nope, not by a long shot. Also, vmware is
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:07:27PM -0700, nate wrote:
> some may even require use of vmware/bochs/etc to run ..
Is bochs anywhere near as user-friendly as vmware yet?
--
Baloo
msg02812/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Oct 02, 1998 at 08:16:59AM -0300, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
wrote:
> Hi Debian users,
> my boss at work have to run a simulation into Excel that uses a DLL of
> Excel (.xll). The problem is that the simulation will take too long (about 7
> years) and he couldn't put
Hi Debian users,
my boss at work have to run a simulation into Excel that uses a DLL of
Excel (.xll). The problem is that the simulation will take too long (about 7
years) and he couldn't put this kind of thing to run in Windowze because it
could go into GPF and loss the entire s
-X in an xterm. It
doesn't recognize all the keys. I think it can be related to some of the
problems I had with the linux binary midnight commander running in an xterm
(absent when running on a linux console).
Q:Has anybody experience the same? May that be related to a bad terminfo
data
xterm. It
doesn't recognize all the keys. I think it can be related to some of the
problems I had with the linux binary midnight commander running in an xterm
(absent when running on a linux console).
Q:Has anybody experience the same? May that be related to a bad terminfo
database?
39 matches
Mail list logo
