Justin R. Miller muttered:
> Say you've got a testing install. Is it better to just pull in sources
> from unstable as well, or to actually dist-upgrade to unstable? As I
> understand it, unstable is a moving target. What would be the
> difference? I dist-upgraded to testing, but most of my pac
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:35:41PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
| Thus spake Adam Warner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
|
| > Since you want the latest software you might want to consider
| > `unstable'. Being an experienced user you'll be able to deal with
| > problems (e.g. if you need to downgrade a pa
Thus spake Adam Warner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Since you want the latest software you might want to consider
> `unstable'. Being an experienced user you'll be able to deal with
> problems (e.g. if you need to downgrade a package). And it's more
> secure than testing.*
>
> If you do upgrade remembe
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 18:02, Jonathan Hunt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am probably going to repartition my hard drive and after being a satisfied
> Debian 2.2r2 user I am going to do a clean install. I was wanting the
> following things in my new setup:
>
> GCC >= 3.0
> XFree86 >= 4.0
>
On 21-Nov-2001 Jonathan Hunt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am probably going to repartition my hard drive and after being a satisfied
> Debian 2.2r2 user I am going to do a clean install. I was wanting the
> following things in my new setup:
>
> GCC >= 3.0
> XFree86 >= 4.0
> Linux kerne
Hi,
I am probably going to repartition my hard drive and after being a satisfied
Debian 2.2r2 user I am going to do a clean install. I was wanting the
following things in my new setup:
GCC >= 3.0
XFree86 >= 4.0
Linux kernel >=2.4.0
ReiserFS (instead of ext2 for m
6 matches
Mail list logo
