> Run the database on the machine that stores the files and perform
> database access remotely over the net instead. ?
yes, but this doesn't resolve the performance issue with nfs
> You could try removing the "sync" option, just as an experiment, to see
> how much it is contributing to the slowdown.
If I don't use sync I got around 300MB/s (tested with 600MB-file) .. that's ok
(far from great), but since there are database files on the nfs it can cause
file/database corr
> You could test with noatime if you don't need access times.
> And perhaps with lazytime instead of relatime.
Mountoptions are:
type zfs (rw,xattr,noacl)
I get you point, but when you look at my fio output, the performance is quiet
good
> Could you provide us
> nfsstat -v
server:
nfsstat -v
Serv
Hi Ralph,
I just tested it with scp and I got 262MB/s
So it's not a network issue, just a NFS issue, somehow.
best regards
Stefan
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 07. März 2024 um 11:22 Uhr
> Von: "Ralph Aichinger"
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: very poor nfs performance
>
> On Thu, 2
4 matches
Mail list logo
