On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:34:32AM +0900, Bengt Thure'e wrote:
| Hej,
|
| I am wondering if Sarges Postfix works with SMTP Auth.
Yes.
| Have not managed to get it to work with PAM-SASLauthd
| If anyone have managed to get it working I would be delighted to receive
| some hints and tips...
Ins
Hej,
I am wondering if Sarges Postfix works with SMTP Auth.
Have not managed to get it to work with PAM-SASLauthd
If anyone have managed to get it working I would be delighted to receive
some hints and tips...
I saw this message which pretty much sums it up, but unfortunately there
is no answer
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 06:04:55PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
| * Rainer Ellinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020622 01:06]:
| > Is there anybody out there having exim (woody) running with smtp auth
| > based on PAM (pam_unix.so)? It seems not to be possible without
| > recompiling exim, using a special
* Rainer Ellinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020622 01:06]:
> Is there anybody out there having exim (woody) running with smtp auth
> based on PAM (pam_unix.so)? It seems not to be possible without
> recompiling exim, using a special pam_exim.so or some other hacks.
I have exim 3.35-1 working with PAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 10:05:35AM +0200, Rainer Ellinger wrote:
> Is there anybody out there having exim (woody) running with smtp auth
> based on PAM (pam_unix.so)? It seems not to be possible without
> recompiling exim, using a special pam_exim.so
Is there anybody out there having exim (woody) running with smtp auth
based on PAM (pam_unix.so)? It seems not to be possible without
recompiling exim, using a special pam_exim.so or some other hacks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
> "Tim" == Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tim> It does, it has a set of functions for doing pam
Tim> authentication. It's about exim. The problem is it runs as
Tim> mail:mail so it can't handele /etc/shadow.
libpam-modules has this setuid helper program:
-rwsr-xr-x1
Eric G. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:35:27 +0100, Tim Dijkstra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I'm trying to get some app to use PAM to authenticate against the
>>/etc/shadow. Shouldn't it be enough for the app to
>>be a member of the 'shadow' group for this to work? Or are there any
>>o
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:35:27 +0100, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get some app to use PAM to authenticate against the
> /etc/shadow. Shouldn't it be enough for the app to
> be a member of the 'shadow' group for this to work? Or are there any
> other restriction
Hi,
I'm trying to get some app to use PAM to authenticate against the
/etc/shadow. Shouldn't it be enough for the app to
be a member of the 'shadow' group for this to work? Or are there any
other restrictions.
(Works fine when I make /etc/shadow world-readable, but don't want that
of course)
10 matches
Mail list logo