Re: Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

2000-02-05 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Onno Ebbinge wrote: > Maybe there is... > > You could patch the program to set the variable at startup from > a parameter or configfile. I haven't seen the source but reading a > variable from a parameter or config file at startup shouldn't be > hard... > Sorry for the late

Re: Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

2000-01-26 Thread Sergey V Kovalyov
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Joe Block wrote: > Joe Emenaker wrote: > > Actually, what we *really* need is some sort of consensus. I mean, it would > > be pretty nice if imapd and other tools (like procmail) all looked in the > > same default location without any configuration. I know Elm and Pine used >

Re: Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

2000-01-25 Thread Onno Ebbinge
At 10:23 PM 1/24/00 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: >On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Joe Block wrote: > >> You aren't. Count me as a vote for $HOME/mail >> > >I can't keep flip-flopping on this. The default mailbox root will remain >$HOME. You have three choices. > >1. Learn to live with it. (Remember you

Re: Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

2000-01-25 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Joe Block wrote: > You aren't. Count me as a vote for $HOME/mail > I can't keep flip-flopping on this. The default mailbox root will remain $HOME. You have three choices. 1. Learn to live with it. (Remember you can always tweak your client.) 2. Recompile the package to

Re: Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

2000-01-25 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
Btw, the volume on debian-user is to high for me to read on a regular basis so you should cc me if you want to get a quick(er) answer. On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Joe Emenaker wrote: > Argh! Okay. Does anybody want to suggest any other imap daemons that allow > me to set the mailroot to $HOME/mail where

Re: Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

2000-01-24 Thread Joe Block
Joe Emenaker wrote: > Actually, what we *really* need is some sort of consensus. I mean, it would > be pretty nice if imapd and other tools (like procmail) all looked in the > same default location without any configuration. I know Elm and Pine used > $HOME/Mail and $HOME/mail at one time. > > Sur

Re: Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

2000-01-24 Thread Joe Emenaker
> Although a number of people have supported my decision to make $HOME/mail > the mailbox root for the UW imap server I maintain, I think it will be for > the best overall if I make it $HOME again. Argh! Okay. Does anybody want to suggest any other imap daemons that allow me to set the mailroot

Re: Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

1999-10-12 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Edward Betts wrote: > > Is it still easy to change back to $HOME/mail or preferably $HOME/Mail ? > Does it require modifiying of source code, or just changing a config file? > A config file kind of sort of. See docs/imaprc.txt in the source. The author warns strongly again

Re: Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

1999-10-12 Thread Edward Betts
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although a number of people have supported my decision to make $HOME/mail > the mailbox root for the UW imap server I maintain, I think it will be for > the best overall if I make it $HOME again. Reasons: > > 1) That's what most of the bug reports a

Attention: imapd gpoing back to $HOME as mailbox root

1999-10-11 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
Although a number of people have supported my decision to make $HOME/mail the mailbox root for the UW imap server I maintain, I think it will be for the best overall if I make it $HOME again. Reasons: 1) That's what most of the bug reports are about. 2) That's what the upstream distribution doe