Re: Another thread about a non-killable process

2006-07-11 Thread Joshua J. Kugler
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 12:58, Michael Marsh wrote: > On 7/11/06, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 July 2006 12:18, Michael Marsh wrote: > > > Does it respond to kill -HUP? > > > > Nope, or to 3, 6, or 11. So, yeah, I'm down to trying random things. :) > > Can you atta

Re: Another thread about a non-killable process

2006-07-11 Thread Michael Marsh
On 7/11/06, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 11 July 2006 12:18, Michael Marsh wrote: > Does it respond to kill -HUP? Nope, or to 3, 6, or 11. So, yeah, I'm down to trying random things. :) Can you attach to it with gdb ("gdb proftpd 889")? It might start responding to k

Re: Another thread about a non-killable process

2006-07-11 Thread Digby Tarvin
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:26:57PM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote: > On Tuesday 11 July 2006 12:18, Michael Marsh wrote: > > On 7/11/06, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Win32? Huh? This is a Debian system. Proftpd is locked (won't accept > > > connections, even though it shows l

Re: Another thread about a non-killable process

2006-07-11 Thread heba
2006/7/11, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Win32? Huh? This is a Debian system. Proftpd is locked (won't accept connections, even though it shows listening on *:ftp. yes...^^...also this is a debian system is not exempt by trojan and virus...^_^ This is what top shows: 899 ft

Re: Another thread about a non-killable process

2006-07-11 Thread Joshua J. Kugler
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 12:18, Michael Marsh wrote: > On 7/11/06, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Win32? Huh? This is a Debian system. Proftpd is locked (won't accept > > connections, even though it shows listening on *:ftp. > > Does it respond to kill -HUP? Nope, or to 3, 6, or

Re: Another thread about a non-killable process

2006-07-11 Thread Michael Marsh
On 7/11/06, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Win32? Huh? This is a Debian system. Proftpd is locked (won't accept connections, even though it shows listening on *:ftp. Does it respond to kill -HUP? -- Michael A. Marsh http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~mmarsh http://mamarsh.blogspot.com

Re: Another thread about a non-killable process

2006-07-11 Thread Joshua J. Kugler
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 11:56, heba wrote: > 2006/7/11, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > OK, so I understand you can't kill a process in a 'D' state. That makes > > sense. > > > > But, why can't you kill a process in state 'R'? > > > > This is what ps aux shows: > > > > ftp899 64.

Re: Another thread about a non-killable process

2006-07-11 Thread heba
2006/7/11, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: OK, so I understand you can't kill a process in a 'D' state. That makes sense. But, why can't you kill a process in state 'R'? This is what ps aux shows: ftp899 64.9 0.2 4164 2216 ?RNs Jun12 27137:59 proftpd: (accepting conne

Another thread about a non-killable process

2006-07-11 Thread Joshua J. Kugler
OK, so I understand you can't kill a process in a 'D' state. That makes sense. But, why can't you kill a process in state 'R'? This is what ps aux shows: ftp899 64.9 0.2 4164 2216 ?RNs Jun12 27137:59 proftpd: (accepting connections) BTW, top shows that process taking 100%