On 06/03/12 15:40, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:15:45 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Does anybody know which package provides OpenGL libraries for
development?
I am using the siduction distribution which is based on Debian sid.
http://www.w3.org/Amaya/User/AmayaWX.html#What
THT
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:15:45 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> Does anybody know which package provides OpenGL libraries for
> development?
>
> I am using the siduction distribution which is based on Debian sid.
http://www.w3.org/Amaya/User/AmayaWX.html#What
THT.
Greetings,
Sian Mountbatten writes:
> Hi All!
>
> Does anybody know which package provides OpenGL libraries for development?
>
> I am using the siduction distribution which is based on Debian sid.
Look for libGL.so (as is, without trailing numbers) under your usr/. It
could have been installed as a result
Hi All!
Does anybody know which package provides OpenGL libraries for development?
I am using the siduction distribution which is based on Debian sid.
--
Sian Mountbatten
Algol 68 specialist
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:06:43 +1100, Scott wrote in message
<4f39ebe3.7070...@gmail.com>:
> On 14/02/12 15:24, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> > Dear List -
> >
> > How do I install Amaya in Debian.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Ethan
> >
&g
On 15/02/12 14:17, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>> On 14/02/12 15:24, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
>>> Dear List -
> To be clear, Amaya isn't provided by Debian in any release (oldstable,
> stable, testing,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:24:22 -0500, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> How do I install Amaya in Debian.
You have a .deb at their site:
http://www.w3.org/Amaya/User/BinDist
But have you considered in using another html editor? :-)
Maybe Kompozer, Bluefish or QuantaPlus... all of them available
On 14/02/12 15:24, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> Dear List -
>
> How do I install Amaya in Debian.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ethan
>
>
>
# apt-get install amaya
Or synaptic, or aptitude, or whatever floats your boat.
NOTE: amaya is *very* intolerant of invalid code (strict
Dear List -
How do I install Amaya in Debian.
Thanks.
Ethan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0lzd0042l88pn...@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
On Jo, 29 iul 10, 13:59:29, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Qui, 29 Jul 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >add
> >
> >dpkg -l | grep
>
> At least here (a somewhat old 8.04 Ubuntu), dpkg -l still requires grep:
>
> $ dpkg -l gnome
> No packages found matching gnome.
Of course, there is no package n
On Thursday 29 July 2010 11:51:55 Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On 7/29/10 11:31 AM, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 07/29/2010 12:22 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >> I understand your issues with all but the last one. A user may need
> >
On Thursday 29 July 2010 11:56:45 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Qui, 29 Jul 2010, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> > See my reply to Eduardo. In short, having (sudo su) available does not
> > mean that (sudo -i) will work.
>
> Well, if you wanna give a full root shell to someone, then do it i
On Qui, 29 Jul 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
add
dpkg -l | grep
At least here (a somewhat old 8.04 Ubuntu), dpkg -l still requires grep:
$ dpkg -l gnome
No packages found matching gnome.
$ dpkg -l | grep gnome
$ LANG=C dpkg -l | grep gnome
ii bluez-gnome0.25-0u
On Qui, 29 Jul 2010, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
See my reply to Eduardo. In short, having (sudo su) available does not mean
that (sudo -i) will work.
Well, if you wanna give a full root shell to someone, then do it in
the correct way (allowing sudo -i to work), instead of allowing "su"
On 7/29/10 11:51 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Thursday 29 July 2010 11:31:05 Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
On 07/29/2010 12:22 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I understand your issues with all but the last one. A user may need
to "sudo su" due to configuration outside of their control. A
On Jo, 29 iul 10, 08:38:00, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>
> For me it something that I just cringe to see. I realize that in
> practice, it is not bad. I just cannot get over feeling uneasy when
> seeing things like:
>
> find | grep
> cat | grep
> ls -l | grep
> for i in $(ls -l foo/)
> sudo su
add
On 7/29/10 11:31 AM, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/29/2010 12:22 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I understand your issues with all but the last one. A user may need
to "sudo su" due to configuration outside of their control. A system
that req
On Thursday 29 July 2010 11:31:05 Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 12:22 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > I understand your issues with all but the last one. A user may need
> > to "sudo su" due to configuration outside of their control. A system
> > that requires you to "sudo su" for
On Thursday 29 July 2010 11:25:51 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Qui, 29 Jul 2010, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> > I understand your issues with all but the last one. A user may need to
> > "sudo su" due to configuration outside of their control. A system that
> > requires you
> > to "sudo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/29/2010 12:22 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
> I understand your issues with all but the last one. A user may need
> to "sudo su" due to configuration outside of their control. A system
> that requires you to "sudo su" for some task is
On Qui, 29 Jul 2010, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
I understand your issues with all but the last one. A user may need to "sudo
su" due to configuration outside of their control. A system that
requires you
to "sudo su" for some task is likely misconfigured, but it is a
useful tool to
hav
On Thursday 29 July 2010 07:38:00 Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> For me it something that I just cringe to see. I realize that in
> practice, it is not bad. I just cannot get over feeling uneasy when
> seeing things like:
>
> find | grep
> cat | grep
> ls -l | grep
> for i in $(ls -l foo/)
> sudo su
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/29/2010 06:08 AM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
>
> I opt to pipe to grep because I usually do a lot more complicated things
> with find and over time, I just kept using grep, it's a personal
> preference really. Just like using locate is far faster
On Jo, 29 iul 10, 05:08:27, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
[snip]
Thanks, learned some new stuff.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 7/29/10 4:57 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Jo, 29 iul 10, 09:50:32, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
If you stop it with ctrl-C, both find and grep get interrupted and stop,
right?
Actually I don't know how shell pipes work here. Is the output of find
piped to grep only when find finishes or as soon as
On Jo, 29 iul 10, 09:50:32, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> If you stop it with ctrl-C, both find and grep get interrupted and stop,
> right?
Actually I don't know how shell pipes work here. Is the output of find
piped to grep only when find finishes or as soon as there is some
output?
Regards,
Andre
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 08:41:57AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 28 iul 10, 16:10:38, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> > On 7/28/10 4:03 PM, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> > >On 07/28/2010 04:11 PM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> > >>
> > >>find / |grep libraptor
> > >
> > >Perhaps you wanted find's -name optio
On Jo, 29 iul 10, 08:41:57, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 28 iul 10, 16:10:38, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> > On 7/28/10 4:03 PM, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> > >On 07/28/2010 04:11 PM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> > >>
> > >>find / |grep libraptor
> > >
> > >Perhaps you wanted find's -name option? find / -nam
On Mi, 28 iul 10, 16:10:38, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On 7/28/10 4:03 PM, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> >On 07/28/2010 04:11 PM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> >>
> >>find / |grep libraptor
> >
> >Perhaps you wanted find's -name option? find / -name 'libraptor*'
>
> I personally prefer to grep over find, but t
Jordon Bedwell said:
you can download the source to amaya and compile it against your
libraptor install (which is what I recommend personally).
Thanks for this suggestion. Would you mind describing the steps in detail. If
it solves my problem I would add these commands to my personal growing
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:31:05
To:
Subject: Re: Amaya W3C Web browser and sid
On 2010-07-28 21:46 +0200, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> Is is possible to get amaya_wx-11.3.1-1_amd64.deb to run on sid?
If you're using the amd64 architecture, most probably yes. Your
X-Newsreader header sug
et the following error message:
>
> ~$ amaya
> /usr/lib/Amaya/wx/bin/amaya_bin: error while loading shared libraries:
> libraptor.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory to
If you're using i386, that is to be expected; you would however not have
been able to
o on about your way, or
you can download the source to amaya and compile it against your
libraptor install (which is what I recommend personally).
Perhaps you wanted find's -name option? find / -name 'libraptor*'
- --
Jordan Metzmeier
I personally prefer to grep over find, bu
way, or
> you can download the source to amaya and compile it against your
> libraptor install (which is what I recommend personally).
>
>
Perhaps you wanted find's -name option? find / -name 'libraptor*'
- --
Jordan Metzmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
On 7/28/10 2:46 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
Is is possible to get amaya_wx-11.3.1-1_amd64.deb to run on sid?
I've installed it with dpkg but get the following error message:
~$ amaya
/usr/lib/Amaya/wx/bin/amaya_bin: error while loading shared libraries:
libraptor.so.1: cannot open shared o
Is is possible to get amaya_wx-11.3.1-1_amd64.deb to run on sid?
I've installed it with dpkg but get the following error message:
~$ amaya
/usr/lib/Amaya/wx/bin/amaya_bin: error while loading shared libraries:
libraptor.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
ion
> `font != NULL' failed.
>
> Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkfont.c: line 318 (gdk_string_width): assertion
> `font != NULL' failed.
>
> Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkfont.c: line 394 (gdk_text_width_wc): assertion
> `font != NULL' failed.
> *** Amaya: Irrecover
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
I just installed the debian package that's distributed from the W3C with
much better luck!
I used: http://www.w3.org/Amaya/Distribution/amaya_gtk-8.0-1_i386.deb
dpkg -i amaya_gtk-8.0-1_i386.deb
I did the same and it installed with no broken dependencies (I have some
I don't know; a home built gtk-gl version also bombs, but a build
against lesstif works fine.
You could do:
cd /usr/src ; apt-get source amaya
modify the debian/rules file to say --without-g...
then build a package ("debian/rules -b") sans gtk-gl.
I've used &q
I just installed the debian package that's distributed from the W3C with
much better luck!
http://www.w3.org/Amaya/User/BinDist.html
I used: http://www.w3.org/Amaya/Distribution/amaya_gtk-8.0-1_i386.deb
When I did
dpkg -i amaya_gtk-8.0-1_i386.deb
and it told me which gk library
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:44:08PM +0100, Dave Howorth wrote:
> Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> >I think I get a little further than that...Do you remember what packages
> >were installed?
>
> It installed just the amaya package. I removed it and installed it again
> to be sur
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
I think I get a little further than that...Do you remember what packages
were installed?
It installed just the amaya package. I removed it and installed it again
to be sure but the result was the same.
Cheers, Dave
--
Dave Howorth
MRC Centre for Protein Engineering
Hills
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:42:07AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > I read a while back that Amaya development/updating wasn't very
> > rapid.
>
> It supports the current standard. People who make the complaint t
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:58:52AM +0100, Dave Howorth wrote:
> I just installed it with exactly that command line. When I type
> % amaya
> it boldly but not very helpfully says:
> *** Amaya: Irrecoverable error ***
I think I get a little further than that...Do you remember w
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Amaya's the only one you need. Standards compliant, too, so instead
> of disgracing yourself by saying it's viewable in only one browser,
> you can proudly say anybody on anything can display it properly.
>
> apt-get install amaya
I just insta
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:19:23PM -0800, Joris Huizer wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I had a look around via google but this is a rather
> specific prob so that's probably why I don't find
> anything relevant on it.
>
> I made some stupid mistake - instead of trying apt-get
> I installed packages
Hello everybody,
I had a look around via google but this is a rather
specific prob so that's probably why I don't find
anything relevant on it.
I made some stupid mistake - instead of trying apt-get
I installed packages from debian directly from the
internet.
It's because they say I need libglib
was only a suggestion. There are so much tools in Debian and i
think nobody knows them all.
> ** I really like the wysiwyg-way of amaya for some tasks. It's a pity
> ** that amaya isn't more stable.
Then you could downgrade to the Potato version. Or wait till the next
update in Wo
Timeboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday Sep 19 19:44 Jan Ulrich Hasecke wrote:
>
> Try bluefish.
Nice tool. But then I would prefer emacs with psgml. ;-)
I really like the wysiwyg-way of amaya for some tasks. It's a pity
that amaya isn't more stable.
Ciao
On Wednesday Sep 19 19:44 Jan Ulrich Hasecke wrote:
> ** Is amaya 5.1 still kind of beta or do I miss something.
That is possible. I tried this tool on Potato and was not very
afraid about amaya. Don't know what's going on with amaya in Woody.
I use bluefish. Try bluefish. It'
Hi,
I recently discovered amaya again and installed it on current
woody. It could be a nice tool, but it crashes often and had a weird
bug in the filebrowser.
When I try to open a file not all folders are displayed in the
file-browser.
Is amaya 5.1 still kind of beta or do I miss something
I have tried to use amaya but it doesn't work;
when I open an html document it just put the
title and the document appears blank; I can't
write anything and sometimes it prints
thot error
thanks for helping me
Hubert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 25 Jan 1998 15:53:50 +0100 grin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I installed Amaya, and I understand that it's a hack, and using lesstif so
>there can be quirks and stuff. Still I wonder, anyone have a working ENTER
>key? Mine's just does nothing, and seems it'
I installed Amaya, and I understand that it's a hack, and using lesstif so
there can be quirks and stuff. Still I wonder, anyone have a working ENTER
key? Mine's just does nothing, and seems it's not possible to insert
elements and some other without ENTER.
If yes, what to do to
54 matches
Mail list logo
