XFree86 tends to benchmark faster (using Matrox cards, which are by far the
best/fastest cards under Linux) than either Metro-X or Accelerated X. It
also has (imho) a better configuration program. From the limited contact
I've had with Accelerated X technical support though they seem pretty good.
On Sun, 2 Nov 1997, Will Lowe wrote:
> I'm thinking about switching to Accelerated X, because it has better
> support for my Diamond 3d 3000 4meg card. I ran the 4.1 demo and it
> seemed ok (other than that I needed to install libtermcap.so.2 to get the
> install process to work).
>
> I'm just
Don't know about your card, but Accelerated X has been working well for
me since v1.2. I wouldn't say I've ever stressed it either, but its done
well for me on cards which weren't well supported under XFree86.
kevin
On Sun, 2 Nov 1997, Will Lowe wrote:
> I'm thinking abou
I'm thinking about switching to Accelerated X, because it has better
support for my Diamond 3d 3000 4meg card. I ran the 4.1 demo and it
seemed ok (other than that I needed to install libtermcap.so.2 to get the
install process to work).
I'm just wondering if anyone has any experience running it
4 matches
Mail list logo
