Re: About blackdown

2005-06-27 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hal Vaughan thresholddigital.com> writes: > My understanding, though, is that this while AWT has some work done, Swing is > still undone. When I write in Java, I'm working on a client program for my > business that receives data and prints it. Since it goes on subscriber's > computers, it *h

Re: About blackdown

2005-06-26 Thread David Baron
On Sunday 26 June 2005 18:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > make it work.  In the long run, I'd love it if I could compile my program > > for Linux, OSX, and Windows, with all executable and library files in one > > or a few directories on an install CD, and easily copy that directory > > tree over

Re: About blackdown

2005-06-26 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Sunday 26 June 2005 08:21 am, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:37:05PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > make it work. In the long run, I'd love it if I could compile my program > > for Linux, OSX, and Windows, with all executable and library files in one > > or a few directories on

Re: About blackdown

2005-06-26 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:37:05PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote: > make it work. In the long run, I'd love it if I could compile my program for > Linux, OSX, and Windows, with all executable and library files in one or a > few directories on an install CD, and easily copy that directory tree over to

Re: About blackdown

2005-06-25 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Friday 24 June 2005 07:13 pm, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Hal Vaughan thresholddigital.com> writes: > > Blackdown, and all the other FOSS implementations of Java are noble > > undertakings and I look forward to the day I can use a completely FOSS > > version of Java on Linux, OSX, and the Redmond OS

Re: About blackdown

2005-06-25 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hal Vaughan thresholddigital.com> writes: > Blackdown, and all the other FOSS implementations of Java are noble > undertakings and I look forward to the day I can use a completely FOSS > version of Java on Linux, OSX, and the Redmond OS. Unfortunately, Blackdown is neither Free Software nor Op

Re: About blackdown

2005-06-23 Thread Aurélien Campéas
Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 17:21 -0400, Tong a écrit : > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:01:56 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > > > Obviously all this from standard debian packages if that is possible > > I've noticed that many of the answers for this thread suggest to avoid the > blackdown. Any justificatio

Re: About blackdown

2005-06-23 Thread Graham Smith
Tong wrote: On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:01:56 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: Obviously all this from standard debian packages if that is possible I've noticed that many of the answers for this thread suggest to avoid the blackdown. Any justification for that? The reason I'm asking is that I aske

Re: About blackdown

2005-06-22 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 05:21 pm, Tong wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:01:56 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > > Obviously all this from standard debian packages if that is possible > > I've noticed that many of the answers for this thread suggest to avoid the > blackdown. Any justification for that?

About blackdown

2005-06-22 Thread Tong
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:01:56 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > Obviously all this from standard debian packages if that is possible I've noticed that many of the answers for this thread suggest to avoid the blackdown. Any justification for that? The reason I'm asking is that I asked a similar quest