Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-31 Thread will trillich
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > "Karsten M. Self" writes: > > > Request: I'd like a list of clients supporting RFC 2015 attachments and > > the plugins necessary to support this. Of particular interest: > > All Windows-based clients which support MIME only by

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-31 Thread Florian Weimer
"Karsten M. Self" writes: > Request: I'd like a list of clients supporting RFC 2015 attachments and > the plugins necessary to support this. Of particular interest: All Windows-based clients which support MIME only by translation at gateways (for example, Lotus Notes, and probably MS-Exchange-

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-24 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:57:17PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:43:47PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > > > get a real mail client that supports RFCs. the relevant RFC is 2015 > > > > i recommend mutt > > Supporting RFCs is fine and should be en

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-24 Thread Volker Gerstenkorn
At 01:59 24.05.2001, you wrote: elsewhere, I don't think anything else can verify mutt's attached PGP/MIME signatures. Bad luck, but Eudora with PGP installed can. It won't even open the attachment without getting the key from a keyserver or already knowing it. Never underestimate Windoze as

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-24 Thread John S. J. Anderson
> On 24 May 2001 14:57:12 +0400, Ilya Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Ilya> I thoght that Gnus itself doesn't support PGP at all. It needs Ilya> Mailcrypt for PGP. And mailcrypt seems to support only embeded Ilya> sigs. Or am I wrong? You're wrong. 8^)= The version of Gnus in CVS (Oort Gn

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-24 Thread Ilya Martynov
Noah> Supporting RFCs is fine and should be encouraged, but from what Noah> I've seen there is not another mail reader in existance that can Noah> verify mutt's attached signatures. john> Just to add to the list, the CVS version of Gnus handles PGP/MIME as john> well. I thoght that Gnus itself

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-24 Thread John S. J. Anderson
> On Wed, 23 May 2001 19:57:17 -0400, "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> said: Noah> Supporting RFCs is fine and should be encouraged, but from what Noah> I've seen there is not another mail reader in existance that can Noah> verify mutt's attached signatures. Just to add to the

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-23 Thread Paul Wright
On 24 May 2001 11:12:27, Craig wrote: > > FWIW, I'm using Evolution 0.10, and I have no problem reading PGP > signatures from mutt users. > I am using mhn/exmh and have no problems with mutt PGP sigs. I had been unaware that any MUA had problems with mutt sigs. -- Paul T. Wright <[EMAIL PRO

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-23 Thread Craig Holyoak
On 23 May 2001 19:57:17 -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > Supporting RFCs is fine and should be encouraged, but from what I've > seen there is not another mail reader in existance that can verify > mutt's attached signatures. FWIW, I'm using Evolution 0.10, and I have no problem reading PGP signat

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-23 Thread Benjamin Black
> I noticed that there are several members PGP-signing their postings. > However, > the signature is MIME-formatted and appears as an attachment in my mail > client, > Netscape Messenger. Because there is no built-in PGP function, I am > forced to > copy/paste the message to TkPGP to verify it. *Bu

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-23 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:51:18PM +0100, Eddy Young wrote: > copy/paste the message to TkPGP to verify it. *But* the signature is > separated > from the message; so, how do I actually verify the > message? What you're supposed to be able to do is save the attached signature to a file (say 'foo.si

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-23 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:43:47PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > get a real mail client that supports RFCs. the relevant RFC is 2015 > > i reccommend mutt Supporting RFCs is fine and should be encouraged, but from what I've seen there is not another mail reader in existance that can verify mutt'

Re: About PGP signatures

2001-05-23 Thread Ethan Benson
get a real mail client that supports RFCs. the relevant RFC is 2015 i reccommend mutt On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:51:18PM +0100, Eddy Young wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that there are several members PGP-signing their postings. > However, > the signature is MIME-formatted and appears as an attach

About PGP signatures

2001-05-23 Thread Eddy Young
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I noticed that there are several members PGP-signing their postings. However, the signature is MIME-formatted and appears as an attachment in my mail client, Netscape Messenger. Because there is no built-in PGP function, I am forced to copy/paste