Re: About Debian documentation

2001-01-26 Thread kmself
on Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 01:30:08PM +0100, Diego Biurrun ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:12:17PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > > > > I'd recommend sticking to "stable" initially. It's better to track by > > release status than by distribution name -- you'll graceful

Re: About Debian documentation

2001-01-26 Thread Joseph Dane
Others have already mentioned how one can go about tracking more recent versions of packages. I will add that many people (well, at least one person: me) would much rather have a system which is "known good" than one with the latest versions. I personally have no need for XF4, so I'll wait un

Re: About Debian documentation

2001-01-26 Thread Diego Biurrun
Hi ! Why should it be preferable to track release status? You might accidentally upgrade your mission critical server to a new distribution when you just wished to install the newest security patches. A few details always break or have to be modified by hand. I think it is much safer to track re

Re: About Debian documentation

2001-01-26 Thread kmself
on Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 12:57:56AM -0600, Dr. Aldo Medina ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > "David B. Harris" wrote: > > > > To quote "Dr. Aldo Medina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > For example, Why are so many packages from older version of > > > programs. For example X-chat, wwwoffle ,ncftp and even X

Re: About Debian documentation

2001-01-26 Thread Dr. Aldo Medina
Ok. So, I understand I can make the change and dselect will just get the new versions as updates without any problem? I will install debian in another (workstation) machine. Can I install directly the "woody" version on it? Thanks for your help "David B. Harris" wrote: > > To quote "Dr. Aldo Medi

Re: About Debian documentation

2001-01-26 Thread David B . Harris
To quote "Dr. Aldo Medina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, # For example, Why are so many packages from older version of programs. # For example X-chat, wwwoffle ,ncftp and even XFree's packages are from # very old versions of the actual programs. # I believe dpkg is the absolute best in terms of packaging sy

About Debian documentation

2001-01-25 Thread Dr. Aldo Medina
I recently installed Debian 2.2 and I'm reading the documentation provided at debian.org. However, I believe it's a little disorganized (or I didn't knew how to read it), because I can understand many things yet. For example, Why are so many packages from older version of programs. For example X-c