Re: APM versus ACPI

2003-09-08 Thread Ismael Valladolid Torres
El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 16:04, Jason Chambers escribe: > ACPI is the newer technology and can do more than APM. However it is still > experimental, especially in 2.4 kernels. The Debian kernels don't > include the later ACPI patch which can improve matters. Emma Jane Hogbin > wr

Re: APM versus ACPI

2003-09-08 Thread Jason Chambers
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:55:59PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: > El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 13:51, Jason Chambers escribe: > > "If both ACPI and Advanced Power Management (APM) support are > >configured, whichever is loaded first shall be used." > > I suspected this.

Re: APM versus ACPI

2003-09-08 Thread Ismael Valladolid Torres
El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 13:51, Jason Chambers escribe: > "If both ACPI and Advanced Power Management (APM) support are >configured, whichever is loaded first shall be used." I suspected this. Which option do you think is better? I am supposing that is ACPI, as it should be a

Re: APM versus ACPI

2003-09-08 Thread Jason Chambers
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:19:55PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if I can use simultaneously apmd (with APM support enabled in > my kernel) and acpid (with ACPI support enabled in my kernel), and > whether this is useful, or ACPI superseedes APM in any way. > You can

APM versus ACPI

2003-09-07 Thread Ismael Valladolid Torres
Hi, I wonder if I can use simultaneously apmd (with APM support enabled in my kernel) and acpid (with ACPI support enabled in my kernel), and whether this is useful, or ACPI superseedes APM in any way. Any feedback will be very useful for me, so thanks in advance. Regards, Ismael -- "Tout fourm