> [Someone else wrote:]
>
> >> i found both unreliable - so i have both rules in my .procmailrc
> >>
> >> :0:
> >> * ^TO_.*\.debian\.org.*
> >> debian.mbox
> >>
> >> :0:
> >> * ^Resend-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>^ That can't be helping ... :)
ps - thanks for the hint ;-)
as the fir
David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Colin Watson wrote:]
>> > I've found Resent-From: more reliable, but YMMV.
[Someone else wrote:]
>> i found both unreliable - so i have both rules in my .procmailrc
>>
>> :0:
>> * ^TO_.*\.debian\.org.*
>> debian.mbox
>>
>> :0:
>> * ^Resend-From: [EMAIL
The Colos list adds these tags, and the consequence is that
the fallback subject threading fails dismally, and most of the
contributors seem to use broken mailers that can't get their
references or in-reply-to headers right. If it wasn't fairly
quiet, I'd have to unsubscribe.
Quoting Oswald Budden
> >Fortunately, every mail to debian-user has a header that looks
> >something like this:
> >
> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >
> >I find this more than adequate for sorting.
>
> I've found Resent-From: more reliable, but YMMV.
>
i found both unreliable - so i have both rules in my .procmai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Z. Maze) wrote:
>Alvaro Ortiz de Urbina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>AOdU> In order to do some filtering, it would be a very good idea to
>AOdU> include in the subjects of messages something like [debusers] or
>AOdU> anything similar.
>
>Fortunately, every mail to debian-us
Alvaro Ortiz de Urbina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AOdU> In order to do some filtering, it would be a very good idea to
AOdU> include in the subjects of messages something like [debusers] or
AOdU> anything similar.
Fortunately, every mail to debian-user has a header that looks
something like this:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:53:07PM +, Alvaro Ortiz de Urbina wrote:
> In order to do some filtering, it would be a very good idea to include in
> the subjects of messages something like [debusers] or anything similar.
No. There are several other fields you can filter on, most notably
Sen
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:53:07 GMT, Alvaro Ortiz de Urbina wrote:
>In order to do some filtering, it would be a very good idea to include in
>the subjects of messages something like [debusers] or anything similar.
Actually it would be a BAD idea. You can easily filter by the header fields
present
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Ortiz de Urbina) wrote:
>In order to do some filtering, it would be a very good idea to include in
>the subjects of messages something like [debusers] or anything similar.
Please filter on something that doesn't needlessly inconvenience other
people. For instance, instal
Use procmail: RTFM! (M as in /usr/doc/procmail/Quickstart)
Ron
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Alvaro Ortiz de Urbina wrote:
> In order to do some filtering, it would be a very good idea to include in
> the subjects of messages something like [debusers] or anything similar.
> _
> In order to do some filtering, it would be a very good idea to include in
> the subjects of messages something like [debusers] or anything similar.
you are just boring ...
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Linux - the last service pack you'll ever need.
In order to do some filtering, it would be a very good idea to include in
the subjects of messages something like [debusers] or anything similar.
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
