On Thu, Apr 16, 1998 at 03:58:48PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is there some 'mutt for pine users' documentation available somewhere?
>
> Not that I'm aware of. There's a Pine.rc in /usr/doc/mutt*/examples that
> gives you Pine-like keybindings though.
That's not enough. What I did was
On Thu, Apr 16, 1998 at 03:57:32PM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
> Is there some 'mutt for pine users' documentation available somewhere?
Not that I'm aware of. There's a Pine.rc in /usr/doc/mutt*/examples that
gives you Pine-like keybindings though.
> In particular, I very much like the 'search
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
> Stephen Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't believe that is true
> > I am using pine under hamm obn my pc here at work
> > well..I have it installed...due to problems with firewall issues and DHCP
> > I can't seem to get mail
He is correct. E .13 needs too much work to make a deb worth it. As soon as
.14 is out and usable there will be a debian package of it. I have already
relased a imlib and a gdk_imlib package. A fnlib package will be out when it
is stable and compiles nicely.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On 15 Apr 98 12:09:52 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris) wrote:
>Another thing - is there any plans for debianizing the enlightenment
>window manager?
>From the "Prospective Packages" list posted here regularly, it seems
that there is:
By Shaleh ([EMAI
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 10:16:26AM -0400, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
>
> The original post also asked about the enlightenment wm. The list of
> prospective packages
> (http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html) lists it as one
> that's being "worked on".
>
IIRC, the future maintaine
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Marco Anglesio wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> > I don't believe that is true
> > I am using pine under hamm obn my pc here at work
>
> Yes, you and me both downloaded the .deb of pine (and pico, and
> pine-docs, probably). However, it's been remov
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> I don't believe that is true
> I am using pine under hamm obn my pc here at work
Yes, you and me both downloaded the .deb of pine (and pico, and
pine-docs, probably). However, it's been removed from binary-i386. I'd
like to know why it's only
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 10:09:52PM +1000, Chris wrote:
> Can anybody tell me when hamm is expected to go stable?
When the're no more release critical bugs left. A list of these is posted on
debian-devel-announce with some regularity (latest:
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-announ
Stephen Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't believe that is true
> I am using pine under hamm obn my pc here at work
> well..I have it installed...due to problems with firewall issues and DHCP
> I can't seem to get mail working but...
> I downloaded pine as a binary for hamm
> I sa
I don't believe that is true
I am using pine under hamm obn my pc here at work
well..I have it installed...due to problems with firewall issues and DHCP
I can't seem to get mail working but...
I downloaded pine as a binary for hamm
I saw the deb of hamm in hamm/non-free/binary-i386/mail
-Steve
Chris wrote:
> Can anybody tell me when hamm is expected to go stable?
I forget whether a date is set or not...but my system crashed due to major
hardware failure (I am
respondign from work now)...hamm seems rather stable
> Also, I am in the middle of installing a hamm system onto a clean drive,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:
> Can anybody tell me when hamm is expected to go stable?
>
> Also, I am in the middle of installing a hamm system onto a clean drive,
> however it seems alot of old packages are missing (ie. pine, etc). Will
> these be includ
Can anybody tell me when hamm is expected to go stable?
Also, I am in the middle of installing a hamm system onto a clean drive,
however it seems alot of old packages are missing (ie. pine, etc). Will
these be included when it goes stable?
Another thing - is there any plans for debianizing the
14 matches
Mail list logo
