In <4a261dba.8040...@t-online.de>, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
>
>
Please pay attention to the Code of Conduct for the list:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Particularly, "Never send your messages in HTML; use plain text instead."
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-.
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[cut]
I'm glad it works for you. I maintain that there are some sites and
some plugins that won't work correctly on amd64, while they work fine
on x86.
Last time I tried virtualbox, would not start that proprietary OS on
amd64, either.
VirtualBox (from Sun) works j
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> thveillon.debian wrote:
>> Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>>> Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
But unless you have a specific need to use stick to 32bit kernel
(driver, old application [in]compatibility), it is wise to move to
64bits.
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> I know that 64bit
Klaus Jantzen wrote:
> On 06/03/2009 09:05 AM, Rod James Bio wrote:
>> Its a Seagate HD. I dont have the exact model number. Now I am
>> checking if this is a hardware problem. One thing that bothers me is
>> why does 32bit works?
>>
>> Klaus Jantzen wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2009 07:46 AM, Rod James Bio
thveillon.debian wrote:
> Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>>> But unless you have a specific need to use stick to 32bit kernel
>>> (driver, old application [in]compatibility), it is wise to move to
>>> 64bits.
>> Why?
>>
>> I know that 64bit is the future. I have the feeling, ho
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>> But unless you have a specific need to use stick to 32bit kernel
>> (driver, old application [in]compatibility), it is wise to move to
>> 64bits.
>
> Why?
>
> I know that 64bit is the future. I have the feeling, however, that many
> applicatio
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> But unless you have a specific need to use stick to 32bit kernel
> (driver, old application [in]compatibility), it is wise to move to
> 64bits.
Why?
I know that 64bit is the future. I have the feeling, however, that many
applications are still better supported on 32bit tha
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:46:50PM +0800, Rod James Bio wrote:
> We've been doing an installation on this LTSP Server we are trying to
> build. While formatting the 500 GB HD the partitioning
> process is stock at 33%. Can anyone suggest if there are limitations or
> problems or past experiences?
On 06/03/2009 09:05 AM, Rod James Bio wrote:
Its a
Seagate HD. I dont have the exact model number. Now I am checking if
this is a hardware problem. One thing that bothers me is why does 32bit
works?
Klaus Jantzen wrote:
On 06/03/2009 07:46 AM, Rod James Bio wrote:
We've been
Its a Seagate HD. I dont have the exact model number. Now I am checking
if this is a hardware problem. One thing that bothers me is why does
32bit works?
Klaus Jantzen wrote:
On 06/03/2009 07:46 AM, Rod James Bio wrote:
We've been doing an installation on this LTSP Server we are trying to
bui
2009/6/3 Frank Lin PIAT :
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:51 +0800, 明覺 wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Rod James Bio wrote:
>> > We've been doing an installation on this LTSP Server we are trying to
>> > build. While formatting the 500 GB HD the partitioning
>> > process is stock at 33%.
>
>
On 06/03/2009 07:46 AM, Rod James Bio wrote:
We've
been doing an installation on this LTSP Server we are trying to
build. While formatting the 500 GB HD the partitioning
process is stock at 33%. Can anyone suggest if there are limitations or
problems or past experiences?
Anyway j
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:51 +0800, 明覺 wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Rod James Bio wrote:
We've been doing an installation on this LTSP Server we are trying to
build. While formatting the 500 GB HD the partitioning
process is stock at 33%.
Yes,
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:51 +0800, 明覺 wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Rod James Bio wrote:
> > We've been doing an installation on this LTSP Server we are trying to
> > build. While formatting the 500 GB HD the partitioning
> > process is stock at 33%.
Yes, hardware failure (hard disk o
What I tried was to partition my HD using other linux installation at my
workplace. Then I tag the partition so it wont be formatted but the
installation still fails. Anyways thanks for the info. I just wanted to
know if there are limitations or problem that could arise. Thanks!
明覺 wrote:
> On Wed
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Rod James Bio wrote:
> We've been doing an installation on this LTSP Server we are trying to
> build. While formatting the 500 GB HD the partitioning
> process is stock at 33%. Can anyone suggest if there are limitations or
> problems or past experiences?
>
> Anyway
We've been doing an installation on this LTSP Server we are trying to
build. While formatting the 500 GB HD the partitioning
process is stock at 33%. Can anyone suggest if there are limitations or
problems or past experiences?
Anyway just for additional information:
I tried using lenny 64bit inst
17 matches
Mail list logo
