Re: 386 Dx-40

1996-10-01 Thread Servo
Lindsay Allen wrote: > > AND THEN... go back to your 386 and run make install, make modules, make > > modules_install > > make modules will take an hour. I am puzzled as to why I should not just > continue with the chroot idea and do the while job that way. > > I learned a lot out of this, so ma

Re: 386 Dx-40

1996-09-27 Thread Lindsay Allen
On Wed, 25 Sep 1996, Hamish Moffatt wrote: [snip] > It has 8mb RAM, and runs pretty well. I wouldn't recommend compiling > a 2.0.x kernel on it, though. With 1.2.13 and early 1.3.x kernels > you could compile the whole kernel in 60-90 minutes on a 386-40/8, > but with 2.0.x you can't even get t

Re: 386 Dx-40

1996-09-26 Thread Owen Crow
On Tue, 24 Sep 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A Q. Q. is anyone out there using still using a 386 dx-40 (running > Linux) and if so could you let us know what problems you are having if any > I am considering the purchase of one.. I'm using a 386dx33 16MB at home right now. I

Re: 386 Dx-40

1996-09-25 Thread Jim Pick
My web server, primary DNS, sendmail and mailagent are running on a 386DX/33 running Slackware. It's got 8MB of RAM and two 200MB hard drives. I've upgraded it to a 2.0.10 kernel (which I compiled on my Pentium/90 Debian machine -- much faster). Upgrading Slackware to a 2.0.x kernel was somewh

Re: 386 Dx-40

1996-09-25 Thread Max Hyre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Dear M[sr]. Lawson I just upgraded from a 386DX-25 on which I'd been running Linux (Debian 0.96R6) with no problem. I had 4 MB RAM and an aged RLL hard drive (100 MB). X would run, but so slowly that I didn't bother with it (but I also had a non-accelerat

Re: 386 Dx-40

1996-09-25 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hi, > A Q. Q. is anyone out there using still using a 386 dx-40 (running > Linux) and if so could you let us know what problems you are having if any > I am considering the purchase of one.. I'm running a 386DX33-256k-8M-1GB/ide-270MBsyquest-ET4000/1MB with no problems. Su

Re: 386 Dx-40

1996-09-25 Thread Nelson Posse Lago
On Tue, 24 Sep 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A Q. Q. is anyone out there using still using a 386 dx-40 (running > Linux) and if so could you let us know what problems you are having if any > I am considering the purchase of one.. It runs fine. Of course, depending on the

Re: 386 Dx-40

1996-09-25 Thread David J. Evans
Oops - I forgot to add that tigger is the 386 !! David On Tue, 24 Sep 1996 09:35:02 GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi folks, > A Q. Q. is anyone out there using still using a 386 dx-40 (running > Linux) and if so could you let us know what problems you are having if a

Re: 386 Dx-40

1996-09-25 Thread bigl
On Tue, 24 Sep 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi folks, > A Q. Q. is anyone out there using still using a 386 dx-40 (running > Linux) and if so could you let us know what problems you are having if any > I am considering the purchase of one.. > > Jonathan > I'm

386 Dx-40

1996-09-24 Thread C . J . Lawson
Hi folks, A Q. Q. is anyone out there using still using a 386 dx-40 (running Linux) and if so could you let us know what problems you are having if any I am considering the purchase of one.. Jonathan