Doublescan 320x240 modeline

2002-03-31 Thread Dave Maxwell
this: Section "Modes" Identifier "Modes[0]" ModeLine "320x240" 15.7 320 324 348 388 240 241 244 253 doublescan ModeLine "400x300" 24.2 400 408 448 504 300 302 306 316 doublescan ModeLine "512x384" 39.

Re: 320X240

2001-04-19 Thread Ilya Martynov
AO> hi ya oliver... AO> for running X11 on i810 chipsets..w/ Xfree-3.3.x ...*ouch*... AO> you need to use intels driver XCom_i810 No, No. He said that he uses XFree 4.0.2. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/)

RE: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Alvin Oga
for help > oliver > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ilya > Martynov > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 12:58 PM > To: Oliver Drechsler > Cc: Alvin Oga; debian-user@lists.d

RE: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Alvin Oga
-- > From: Alvin Oga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:06 AM > To: Oliver Drechsler > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: 320X240 > > > > hi ya oliver.. > > what is the graphics controller chip you are using ??? > >

Re: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Willi Dyck
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:46:52AM -0400, D-Man wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:48:24PM +0200, Willi Dyck wrote: > | On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 02:05:59AM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote: > | > > | > use XFree_SVGA -probeonly to see what your resolution will be... > | > tweek /etc/X11/XF86Config till its

RE: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Joris Lambrecht
grading to a newer version of X solved the issue completely regards, joris -Original Message- From: D-Man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 18 april 2001 17:47 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: 320X240 On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:48:24PM +0200, Willi Dyck wrote: | O

Re: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Ilya Martynov
D> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:48:24PM +0200, Willi Dyck wrote: D> | On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 02:05:59AM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote: D> | > D> | > use XFree_SVGA -probeonly to see what your resolution will be... D> | > tweek /etc/X11/XF86Config till its the usable resolution D> | D> | And when that's

Re: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread D-Man
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:48:24PM +0200, Willi Dyck wrote: | On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 02:05:59AM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote: | > | > use XFree_SVGA -probeonly to see what your resolution will be... | > tweek /etc/X11/XF86Config till its the usable resolution | | And when that's all done try hitting

Re: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Ilya Martynov
OD> hi ilya, >> You need agpgart module if you want normal resolutions to work on >> i810. It should be in latest versions of 2.2.x kernel (I use 2.2.18 >> and it does there) or 2.4.xx. Once you should load compiled agpgart >> module before starting X. You can also compile DRI support module if >>

RE: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Oliver Drechsler
org Subject: Re: 320X240 OD> what is the graphics controller chip you are using ??? OD> -- i use intel i810 You need agpgart module if you want normal resolutions to work on i810. It should be in latest versions of 2.2.x kernel (I use 2.2.18 and it does there) or 2.4.xx. Once you should

Re: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Ilya Martynov
OD> what is the graphics controller chip you are using ??? OD> -- i use intel i810 You need agpgart module if you want normal resolutions to work on i810. It should be in latest versions of 2.2.x kernel (I use 2.2.18 and it does there) or 2.4.xx. Once you should load compiled agpgart modu

Re: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Willi Dyck
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 02:05:59AM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote: > > hi ya oliver.. > > what is the graphics controller chip you are using ??? > > which X server are you using ??? > XFree_SVGA is usually generic enough to get you started... > > which XF86 are you using ?? ( 3.3.x or 4.0.x ?? ) > >

RE: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Oliver Drechsler
-Original Message- From: Alvin Oga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:06 AM To: Oliver Drechsler Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: 320X240 hi ya oliver.. what is the graphics controller chip you are using ??? -- i use intel i810 which

Re: 320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Alvin Oga
/XF86Config till its the usable resolution have fun linuxing alvin On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Oliver Drechsler wrote: > hi all, > > i used XF86Setup to make a x configfile. > but my graphic desktop is tooo large for the screen(i thing 320X240 or > smaller) > i tryed two days

320X240

2001-04-18 Thread Oliver Drechsler
hi all, i used XF86Setup to make a x configfile. but my graphic desktop is tooo large for the screen(i thing 320X240 or smaller) i tryed two days to reconfig but it doesent work. where is the mistake ?? thanks for help and sorry about my bad english oliver

Re: X coming up in 320x240!!!!

2000-01-26 Thread Dänzer
--- Josh Orfanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I upgraded to Xfree3.3.6 to support my Diamond Viper 550. The installation > goes fine but when I startx X comes up in 320x240. Shift-Alt + or - on the > number pad or the keyboard does nothing but put a + and - sign on the xterm

X coming up in 320x240!!!!

2000-01-26 Thread Josh Orfanakis
I upgraded to Xfree3.3.6 to support my Diamond Viper 550. The installation goes fine but when I startx X comes up in 320x240. Shift-Alt + or - on the number pad or the keyboard does nothing but put a + and - sign on the xterm prompt. I don't understand how to get it into a diff