Re: 2.4.18 - nic modules

2002-05-02 Thread Andrew Agno
Keith O'Connell writes: > Most excellent - that was the answer I needed to get it to work. I > would like to know the reason for the name change. I now have to > have two names for the same driver in /etc/modules so that I can > boot between 2.2 & 2.4 as and when I need to! Well, you can alway

Re: 2.4.18 - nic modules

2002-05-02 Thread Bob Underwood
On Thursday 02 May 2002 19:25, Keith O'Connell wrote: > Hi, > > > Try 8139too. I don't know the whole story, but something about > > different people maintaining it now caused the name change. > > Most excellent - that was the answer I needed to get it to work. I would > like to know the reason fo

Re: 2.4.18 - nic modules

2002-05-02 Thread Keith O'Connell
Hi, > Try 8139too. I don't know the whole story, but something about > different people maintaining it now caused the name change. Most excellent - that was the answer I needed to get it to work. I would like to know the reason for the name change. I now have to have two names for the same dri

Re: 2.4.18 - nic modules

2002-05-02 Thread dman
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:51PM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote: [much snipped] | there is a rtl8139.o in the 2.2.20 tree, but not in the 2.4.18 tree. Try 8139too. I don't know the whole story, but something about different people maintaining it now caused the name change. -D -- The truly r

2.4.18 - nic modules

2002-05-02 Thread Keith O'Connell
Hi, Today, I had to change out the network cards in a machine that had been running 2.4 under woody. The old cards were Netgear cards that used the natsemi.o modules. I replaced them with two different cards that use the rtl8139.o modules. I then wiped the machine and started from scratch. The