Hi Steve,
Thanks for the info on root shell exploits! If anyone has any more
reasons I can use to persuade my ISP to upgrade from Debian 1.1 I'd be
greatful.
Marcus
Stephen Carpenter wrote:
"Root Shell Exploits" are bugs in programs that either run as root (like a
network service deamon like t
On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 07:42:04PM -0700, Marcus Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 1998 Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> >> So, given the fact I'm not in a position to compel the admin to upgrade
> >> to Debian 1.3 or 2.0 (but can and will lobby for it),
>
> >Probably your admin will feel more necourage
On Fri, 29 May 1998 Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>> So, given the fact I'm not in a position to compel the admin to upgrade
>> to Debian 1.3 or 2.0 (but can and will lobby for it),
>Probably your admin will feel more necouraged if you show him some of the
>root shell expoits that have been found since
busmice modules. I agree.
I haven't checked out Debian 1.1.2 which has just been released.
happy hacking :-)
Lazaro
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 1.1 problems
Author: Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at ccl
**On 04 Jul, In article "Debian-1.1 problems: locale + dosemu + nfs-mount",
** RO (Rolf Obrecht) writes:
RO>Hi out there,
RO>I upgraded from 0.93 to 1.1 and found some problems:
RO>
RO>1.) Several programs which try to set the locale fail and give me error
RO&
> On Mon, 17 Jun 1996 06:58:53 +1000, Mark Phillips
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mark> dependency problem prevents configuration of libc5-dev
Mark> libc5-dev depends on libc5 (=5.2.18-8) however:
Mark> version of libc5 on system is 5.2.18-9
Get a newer libc5-dev (5.2.
You might try the "modconf" tool. This is a shell/dialog program I wrote
to help with static module configuration.
Thanks
Bruce
> dependency problem prevents configuration of libc5-dev
> libc5-dev depends on libc5 (=5.2.18-8) however:
> version of libc5 on system is 5.2.18-9
i'm shooting from the hip, but how about reinstalling both to the
current version?
> Next problem: when trying to configure my ethernet
Linux Journal has been running a series of article on writing a character
device driver as a module. The conclusion will be in next months issue, so
watch for it. There are some good discussions here on the fundimentals of
modules under Linux.
Enjoy,
Dwarf
Mark Phillips wrote:
:
:
: Next problem: when I boot I now get the following error messages:
: Configuring serial ports/dev/cua0: No such device
: done.
: /dev/cua0: No such device
: /dev/cua1: No such device
: /dev/cua2: No such device
: /dev/cua3: No such device
Perhaps you serial driver i
Susan Kleinmann wrote:
> I agree it would be helpful if more of the module documentation were
> placed in the /usr/doc directory. I suspect this hasn't happened yet
> because the modules project has been moving _very_ fast.
> There was an article on modules (now outmoded, but good for overview)
turn-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "James D. Freels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (message from
> Lukas Nellen on Wed, 15 May 1996 13:00:45
> In general, I think the beta 1.1 installation lacks severely in this
> regard. There is an item on the menu to add the modules. However, it
> does not run correctly and gives a ton of error messages saying it
> cannot find the /etc/modules file (when it is there!), and will not
> allow the inst
>no problems using the 3c503. All I had to do was to list the driver in
>/etc/modules. Also, when you try to load the driver by hand, make sure
>you use modprobe, not insmod, as the 3c503 is layered on top of
>another module. And make sure you run depmod at least once - the new
>/etc/init.d/modules
> "James" == "James D Freels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
James> I have just installed the root and base diskettes and
James> performed a basic configuration of v 1.1 on a raw system.
James> I have a 3com 3c503 ethernet card that is apparently not
James> recognized. I seem to
> The search system has not responded tonight while I was searching
> for a solution to this problem.
"has not reponded" is a very vague description. Can you give a better
one please?
> another question(s): what good is an extensive mailing list archive if the
> search system does not work? Also
The search system has not responded tonight while I was searching
for a solution to this problem.
I have just installed the root and base diskettes and performed
a basic configuration of v 1.1 on a raw system. I have a 3com 3c503
ethernet card that is apparently not recognized. I seem to recall
17 matches
Mail list logo
