On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:05:30 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> Besides, GRUB (legacy and 2) if the default bootloader in many linux
>> distriburions, as well as BSD and OpenSolaris. It manages well with
>> many different environments, is very flexible and powefull so it tends
>> to be
Camaleón wrote:
> Bob proulx wrote:
> > Hmm... Is there something in particular that makes grub different from
> > any other random project?
>
> Yes. There are not many bootloaders out there with the same capabilities
> that show GRUB :-)
>
> Besides, GRUB (legacy and 2) if the default bootlo
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:06:12 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> It is strange because it would have been easy and wold not have been
>> taxing to have a
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grublegacy.html page for those
>> people who need to consult or refer others to grub-legacy's
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:05:53 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> They can "move on" without hurting users >:-(
>
> Hmm... Is there something in particular that makes grub different from
> any other random project?
Yes. There are not many bootloaders out there with the same capabil
Bob Proulx wrote:
Well... If you (and Camaleón) feel that strongly about it then
discussing it here should just be a launching point to taking the
discussion to upstream. Don't be shy about giving them feedback!
Otherwise how will they know? I am sure they will have considered
this already but
Tom H wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Why is that strange? The official documentation for GNU projects is
> > texinfo documentation. It has been this way for a very long time.
>
> It is strange because it would have been easy and wold not have been
> taxing to have a
> http://www.gnu.org/software
Camaleón wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > They have moved on.
>
> They can "move on" without hurting users >:-(
Hmm... Is there something in particular that makes grub different
from any other random project? Does every project need to keep every
version of their history available and online fo
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Paul E Condon
wrote:
> I'm sorry for my misunderstanding of your relationship to this
> wierdness.
No problem.
> And thanks for your added information that access to the
> old docs is decaying as we speak. Not good, IMHO.
You're welcome. Someone more familiar w
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Paul E Condon wrote:
>> Tom H wrote:
>> > Paul E Condon wrote:
>> > > Tom H wrote:
>> > >> Camaleón wrote:
>> > >> >> This is the same url as the previous (grub1) manual, so as far as
>> > >> >> gnu is
>> > >> >> concerned, there must only be o
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:00:53 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Paul E Condon wrote:
>> Tom H wrote:
>> > Paul E Condon wrote:
>> > > Tom H wrote:
>> > >> Camaleón wrote:
>> > >> >> This is the same url as the previous (grub1) manual, so as far
>> > >> >> as gnu is concerned, there must only be one grub..
Paul E Condon wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
> > Paul E Condon wrote:
> > > Tom H wrote:
> > >> Camaleón wrote:
> > >> >> This is the same url as the previous (grub1) manual, so as far as gnu
> > >> >> is
> > >> >> concerned, there must only be one grub...
> > >> >
> > >> > How bad! :-(
They have moved on
On 20100710_155720, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Paul E Condon
> wrote:
> > On 20100710_103920, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Camale?n wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camale?n wro
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Paul E Condon
wrote:
> On 20100710_103920, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Camale?n wrote:
>> > On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camale?n wrote:
>> >
>> >>> But it have been desiderable to
On 20100710_103920, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Camale?n wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camale?n wrote:
> >
> >>> But it have been desiderable to name it "GRUB2" or something like that
> >>> to prevent old GRU
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> But it have been desiderable to name it "GRUB2" or something like that
>>> to prevent old GRUB users to be more confused than they are now w
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> But it have been desiderable to name it "GRUB2" or something like that
>> to prevent old GRUB users to be more confused than they are now with 2
>> GRUBs in play :-)
>
> This is the same url as
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:53:30 -0500, Arthur Machlas wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>> There is now an official grub2 manual:
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html
>>
>> Great news!
>
> Sure...
>
> But it ha
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:53:30 -0500, Arthur Machlas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> There is now an official grub2 manual:
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html
>
> Great news!
Sure...
But it have been desiderable to name it "GRUB2" or something like that
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Tom H wrote:
> There is now an official grub2 manual:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html
Great news!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
There is now an official grub2 manual:
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin5lburwod_d67srunaoekt
20 matches
Mail list logo
