On Sunday 14 April 2002 11:35 pm, Rich Puhek wrote:
> ben wrote:
> > so that e2fsck on an unmounted partition is okay? but to check a mounted
> > partition it should be efsck? or what?
> >
> > sorry, i haven't been following the thread. i'm not sure if it matters
> > but since using the 2.4.17 kern
ben wrote:
>
>
> so that e2fsck on an unmounted partition is okay? but to check a mounted
> partition it should be efsck? or what?
>
> sorry, i haven't been following the thread. i'm not sure if it matters but
> since using the 2.4.17 kernel on my machine , crashes nessecitating the check
> hav
On Sunday 14 April 2002 11:00 pm, Alvin Oga wrote:
> hi ya
>
> > can you indicate some point of reference to justify that claim? my system
> > runs e2fsck by default after every 20 bootups, and i've yet to notice any
> > damage due to that.
>
> sorry for the confusing comment...
>
> on your box...
hi ya
> can you indicate some point of reference to justify that claim? my system
> runs e2fsck by default after every 20 bootups, and i've yet to notice any
> damage due to that.
sorry for the confusing comment...
on your box... try to run "e2fsck /dev/hda1" if your / is on /dev/hda1
nor
4 matches
Mail list logo
