Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> I have received plenty of spams with valid DKIM signatures. As long as
> you have a domain, adding DKIM is pretty straightforward.
Perhaps one should look into what valid DKIM sig means, perhaps it is not
exactly the same what you understand.
https://mandrill.zendes
On Dom, 13 Ago 2017, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote:
By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature. Please explain to me why
the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Please ...
I have received plenty of spams with valid DKIM signatures. As long as
you have a domain, adding DKIM is pretty st
> It would be best not to reply to it (unless you feel like replying
Thanks, Andy!!!
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
Byung-Hee HWANG [2017-08-13 23:21:04+09] wrote:
> By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature. Please explain to me why
> the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Please ...
Please don't quote spam messages, or even better, don't reply at all.
Some of us are trying to train our spam filters and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 02:44:56PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 11:21:04PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote:
>
> [snipped spam]
>
> > By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature.
>
> It came from a real person
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 11:21:04PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote:
[snipped spam]
> By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature.
It came from a real person so why wouldn't it? DKIM says nothing of
content.
> Please explain to me why the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Pleas
Robert Villeneuve 께서 쓰시길,
《記事 全文 <1249917413.723454.1502628018...@mail.yahoo.com> 에서》:
> Would you be my king?
> http://bitly.com/2vDwoQj
By the way the mail got valid DKIM signature. Please explain to me why
the mail is here. It's odd. Please Please Please ...
Sincerely,
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_
7 matches
Mail list logo
