Re: [OT] Samsung-provided linux drivers could be dangerous

2007-07-19 Thread John W. Foster
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 13:42, Anson Gardner wrote: > http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/Samsung_Linux_printer_driver_modifies_the_pe >rmissions_of_many_executables > > I was going to recommend a Samsung Laser printer (like my ML-2250) on > the "Economic Printer" thread, but now maybe not. > > Well, in

Re: [OT] Samsung-provided linux drivers could be dangerous

2007-07-18 Thread Chris Lale
Anson Gardner wrote: > http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/Samsung_Linux_printer_driver_modifies_the_permissions_of_many_executables > > I was going to recommend a Samsung Laser printer (like my ML-2250) on > the "Economic Printer" thread, but now maybe not. > > Well, in fact I still recommend it, ju

Re: [OT] Samsung-provided linux drivers could be dangerous

2007-07-17 Thread Andrew J. Barr
On 7/17/07, Anson Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/Samsung_Linux_printer_driver_modifies_the_permissions_of_many_executables I was going to recommend a Samsung Laser printer (like my ML-2250) on the "Economic Printer" thread, but now maybe not. I remember seein

[OT] Samsung-provided linux drivers could be dangerous

2007-07-17 Thread Anson Gardner
http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/Samsung_Linux_printer_driver_modifies_the_permissions_of_many_executables I was going to recommend a Samsung Laser printer (like my ML-2250) on the "Economic Printer" thread, but now maybe not. Well, in fact I still recommend it, just not their driver CD. I wonder