On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:00:22 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Monday 01 November 2010 14:34:10 Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:14:48 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> > Users didn't want UNIX or C when it was invented. Users didn't want
>> > the GUI when it was invented.
>
On Monday 01 November 2010 14:34:10 Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:14:48 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > Users didn't want UNIX or C when it was invented. Users didn't want the
> > GUI when it was invented.
>
> Are you basing your argument in stating that all users in the world
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:14:48 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , Camaleón wrote:
>>> Studies and experience have shown time and time again that users
>>> *don't know* what they want. Henry Ford once said: "If I asked my
>>> customers what they wanted, they would have said 'A faster horse
In , Camaleón wrote:
>On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 02:42:37 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> In , Camaleón wrote:
>(...)
>
>>>If you are concerned about that "usability problem" then ask the users
>>>what would they prefer and what would be more confortable for them. Do
>>>not make the error of just
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 02:42:37 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>If you are concerned about that "usability problem" then ask the users
>>what would they prefer and what would be more confortable for them. Do
>>not make the error of just think for them.
>
> Studi
Dne, 01. 11. 2010 08:42:37 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):
Studies and experience have shown time and time again that users
*don't know*
what they want. Henry Ford once said: "If I asked my customers what
they
wanted, they would have said 'A faster horse.'" It is an unfortunate
tru
In , Camaleón wrote:
>On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:40:49 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> When using the web, you are using a pull / request model. In this case,
>> server dictates the terms. The UA must accept and process whatever the
>> server deigns to deliver as part of the request, and the
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:40:49 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , Camaleón wrote:
>>It is called "evolution".
>>
>>The first hypertext applications were not very dynamic, I'd say, just
>>text and some links to jump to. Just look around now what the web has to
>>offer.
>
> Yes, because HTM
On 10/31/2010 08:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
[snip]
Come on, we cannot be so hypocrite. In no way html is a bad thing "per
se", it is an standard, it has it uses and people need that feature. 2400
people need that feature.
In business, people *constantly* use html mail in Outlook/Exchange
and it's
On 10/31/2010 08:14 AM, Klistvud wrote:
Dne, 31. 10. 2010 12:02:39 je Camaleón napisal(a):
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:49:24 +, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 31 October 2010 10:32:24 Camaleón wrote:
>> I don't see how a "lack" (meaning, "inability of choice") can
be a good
>> feature ;-(
I don't thi
In , Camaleón wrote:
>On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:51:04 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> In , Camaleón wrote:
>>>On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:51:05 +0100, Klistvud wrote:
Dne, 31. 10. 2010 14:51:00 je Camaleón napisal(a):
> I don't know how can you equate all that stuff with having html
>
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:51:04 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , Camaleón wrote:
>>On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:51:05 +0100, Klistvud wrote:
>>> Dne, 31. 10. 2010 14:51:00 je Camaleón napisal(a):
I don't know how can you equate all that stuff with having html
e-mail unsless you also av
In , Camaleón wrote:
>On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:51:05 +0100, Klistvud wrote:
>> Dne, 31. 10. 2010 14:51:00 je Camaleón napisal(a):
>>> I don't know how can you equate all that stuff with having html e-mail
>>> unsless you also avoid using Internet (websites use html and not plain
>>> text and we are a
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:51:05 +0100, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 31. 10. 2010 14:51:00 je Camaleón napisal(a):
>> I don't know how can you equate all that stuff with having html e-mail
>> unsless you also avoid using Internet (websites use html and not plain
>> text and we are all happy with that).
>
Dne, 31. 10. 2010 14:51:00 je Camaleón napisal(a):
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:14:12 +0100, Klistvud wrote:
>
> I don't think you can directly equate "choice" to "feature" just
like
> that. Not letting kids wield guns, or prostitute themselves, or
work in
> sweatshops, are "features" although actu
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:14:12 +0100, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 31. 10. 2010 12:02:39 je Camaleón napisal(a):
>> >> I don't see how a "lack" (meaning, "inability of choice") can be a
>> >> good feature ;-(
>
> I don't think you can directly equate "choice" to "feature" just like
> that. Not letting k
On 10/31/2010 09:14 AM, Klistvud wrote:
> Unfortunately, many of us have that path quite simply *thrust upon
> us*. I wouldn't call that a choice by any stretch of the imagination.
> Ever tried updating your mail over a tethered UMTS phone because your
> DSL line just died or you're in the wild som
Dne, 31. 10. 2010 12:02:39 je Camaleón napisal(a):
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:49:24 +, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 31 October 2010 10:32:24 Camaleón wrote:
>> I don't see how a "lack" (meaning, "inability of choice") can be a
good
>> feature ;-(
I don't think you can directly equate "choice" to
18 matches
Mail list logo
