Re: [OT] IANA ports (was: Filezilla a security risk)

2012-07-09 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 20:09:41 +0200, Slavko wrote: > Dňa Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:10:27 + (UTC) Camaleón > napísal: (...) >> SMTPS (and SMTP over SSL/TLS) is standarized as always has been, what >> happens is that it was updated to use starttls extension and the older >> RFC was deprecated (but s

Re: [OT] IANA ports (was: Filezilla a security risk)

2012-07-08 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:10:27 + (UTC) Camaleón napísal: > The "why" is not in your first message but in your second post: > > "if smtps is standardized, then why i see this:" Oh, yes. My misunderstand, i am sorry. > >> is not detailed in the RFC (because RFCs are not the place for lo

Re: [OT] IANA ports (was: Filezilla a security risk)

2012-07-08 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 13:36:32 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012, Camaleón wrote: >> SMTPS (and SMTP over SSL/TLS) is standarized as always has been, what > > Actually, at least on port 465, it is deprecated with prejudice as it > has been assigned to something else.

Re: [OT] IANA ports (was: Filezilla a security risk)

2012-07-08 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012, Camaleón wrote: > SMTPS (and SMTP over SSL/TLS) is standarized as always has been, what Actually, at least on port 465, it is deprecated with prejudice as it has been assigned to something else. > happens is that it was updated to use starttls extension and the older > RFC

Re: [OT] IANA ports (was: Filezilla a security risk)

2012-07-08 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 17:56:21 +0200, Slavko wrote: > Dňa Sun, 8 Jul 2012 15:33:17 + (UTC) Camaleón > napísal: > >> What Wikipedia explains (and you asked "why") about the "smtps" >> standard > > Reread my initial mail, please. I don't ask "why" in it, but my english > is poor, then perhaps i

Re: [OT] IANA ports (was: Filezilla a security risk)

2012-07-08 Thread Slavko
Hi, Dňa Sun, 8 Jul 2012 15:33:17 + (UTC) Camaleón napísal: > What Wikipedia explains (and you asked "why") about the "smtps" standard Reread my initial mail, please. I don't ask "why" in it, but my english is poor, then perhaps i wrote it in wrong manner. > is not detailed in the RFC (bec

Re: [OT] IANA ports (was: Filezilla a security risk)

2012-07-08 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 17:22:35 +0200, Slavko wrote: > Dňa Sun, 8 Jul 2012 15:02:11 + (UTC) Camaleón > napísal: > >> > can you please tell me the RFC about SMTPS? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMTPS >> >> > I never know, that internet standards are controlled by wikipedia. It is > great

Re: [OT] IANA ports (was: Filezilla a security risk)

2012-07-08 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Sun, 8 Jul 2012 15:02:11 + (UTC) Camaleón napísal: > > can you please tell me the RFC about SMTPS? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMTPS > I never know, that internet standards are controlled by wikipedia. It is great, now anybody can create the own standard and nobody need the

[OT] IANA ports (was: Filezilla a security risk)

2012-07-08 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:36:20 +0200, Slavko wrote: > Dňa Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:59:50 + (UTC) Camaleón > napísal: > >> > By mi search, the standard is SMTP + STARTTLS and not SSL + SMTP. > >> There are different implementations, all of them standarized: >> >> While imaps (tcp/993), pop3s (tcp/9