On Oct 02 2005, Alvin Oga wrote:
> i can only draw squares with xfig or dia or geda
> - too much buttons and menus just to make simple
> squares, rectangles, cirles, lines, and arrows
Really, using xfig is an excellent option for those interested in
generating (vector) graphics that ca
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> ®áèek Kry¹tof wrote:
> > Good joke !
> > XPAINT looks even worse than GIMP :-)
> >
>
> As the Debian maintainer of Xpaint, should I take offence?
nah... he didnt say why it was good or bad..
-
this was done in gimp ... by a "gimp[ee|er]",
htt
Žáček Kryštof wrote:
Good joke !
XPAINT looks even worse than GIMP :-)
As the Debian maintainer of Xpaint, should I take offence?
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mitja Podreka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Try GimpShop. It is still Gimp but the menus are like in Photoshop and
> it runs in just one window.
> http://plasticbugs.com/index.php?p=241
> Search the user comments for ports for different OS.
Nice. Is anyone working on an official Debian package?
Žáček Kryštof wrote:
This is not just your first impression. GIMP sucks even after long term usage
in terms of usability - windows scattered over the whole desktop, overlapped
toolbox windows, incredibly stupid archane file dialog, the gtk slowness etc..
Try GimpShop. It is still Gimp but the
> g r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a pity people have to ask around before they can
> draw a rectangle with a graphics program. I had the
> same question. I haven't come across a less intuitive
> windows program than GIMP. I know I am commenting
> based on my quick first impression and c
Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And secondly, the way the Gimp has a decentralized window setup
> (they're all 100% "MDI" windows, to use the Win32 term) is a curse and
> a blessing. In most Linuxy desktop environments, it's easy to switch
> virtual desktops, and makes this a more pleasan
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:01:46PM -0700, g r wrote:
> It's a pity people have to ask around before they can
> draw a rectangle with a graphics program. I had the
> same question. I haven't come across a less intuitive
> windows program than GIMP. I know I am commenting
> based on my quick first im
g r wrote:
It's a pity people have to ask around before they can
draw a rectangle with a graphics program. I had the
same question. I haven't come across a less intuitive
windows program than GIMP. I know I am commenting
based on my quick first impression and criticizing a
free tool. But what go
gr wrote:
> It's a pity people have to ask around before they can
> draw a rectangle with a graphics program. I had the
> same question.
I'm wondering how the question resulted in Gimp for an answer..
Gimp wasn't exactly designed for drawing. You want a vector drawing
program of some kind. so
debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: [OT] Drawing a rectangle with Gimp
>
> Žáček Kryštof wrote:
> > This is not just your first impression. GIMP sucks even
> after long term usage in terms of usability - windows
> scattered over the whole desktop, overlapped toolbox windows,
x27;s Krita program is the step in the right direction, it has just to catch up in features.
-Original Message-
From: g r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: [OT] Drawing a rect
step in the right
direction, it has just to catch up in features.
> -Original Message-
> From: g r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Re: [OT] Drawin
It's a pity people have to ask around before they can
draw a rectangle with a graphics program. I had the
same question. I haven't come across a less intuitive
windows program than GIMP. I know I am commenting
based on my quick first impression and criticizing a
free tool. But what good is "free" i
14 matches
Mail list logo
