Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-22 Thread David Jardine
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:05:05AM -0600, s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from David Jardine: > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:08:02PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > > David Jardine wrote: > > > > > > >I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to > > > >start, but I'm sur

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-22 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from David Jardine: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:08:02PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > David Jardine wrote: > > > > >I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to > > >start, but I'm sure someone else on the list can explain. > > > >It is really easy to

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread David Jardine
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:08:02PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > David Jardine wrote: > > >I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to > >start, but I'm sure someone else on the list can explain. > > > > > > Hey, > >It is really easy to file a bug report. Just

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
David Jardine wrote: I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to start, but I'm sure someone else on the list can explain. Hey, It is really easy to file a bug report. Just install reportbug package and it will do all the 'dirty' work. You need to have an active

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread David Jardine
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:01:05AM -0400, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: > On Sat 21 May 05, 8:30 AM, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0200, David Jardine wrote: > > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote: > > > > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/m

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Sat 21 May 05, 8:30 AM, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0200, David Jardine wrote: > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote: > > > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that > > > nything after '#' is ing

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread Carl Fink
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0200, David Jardine wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote: > > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that > > nything after '#' is ingored. But this is wrong. Only lines which BEGIN > > with '#' are ignored

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread David Jardine
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote: > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that > nything after '#' is ingored. But this is wrong. Only lines which BEGIN with > '#' are ignored. This should be changed. Hmm. 'Comments begin with a "#", and ever

/etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-20 Thread Jacobo221
In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that nything after '#' is ingored. But this is wrong. Only lines which BEGIN with '#' are ignored. This should be changed. Since /etc/modules appears to not be placed by any package but instead dynamically created, I wonder where