Re: /etc/apt/sources.list example [WAS Re: medically smart watches]

On 2/25/24 07:14, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: I have to agree, and pursuing that seems to disclose I do not have the non-frre in my configs. So I'm now asking for help to add it to my /etc/apt/sources *.list stuff. For apt sources.list - have a look at: https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList Th

/etc/apt/sources.list example [WAS Re: medically smart watches]

On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 05:16:21AM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > On 2/25/24 03:36, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 02:05:50PM -0500, Lee wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 12:06 PM gene heskett wrote: > > > > On 2/24/24 11:03, Loïc Grenié wrote: > > > > > On Sat Feb 24th, 2024, a

Re: About /etc/apt/sources.list | Warehouse for users of the stable version

f > only bullseye and bullsey-updates were added to /etc/apt/sources.list and he > added all four bullseys to /etc/apt/sources.list at the same time? > > Please give me some of your professional advice. Hi.. This is my second attempt to help answer, LOL. After looking at your link th

Re: About /etc/apt/sources.list | Warehouse for users of the stable version

tps://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libisofs as "browse source code" to the right under the title "links".) > Would it make any difference if > only bullseye and bullsey-updates were added to /etc/apt/sources.list and he > added all four bullseys to /etc/apt/sources.list at t

About /etc/apt/sources.list | Warehouse for users of the stable version

/sources.list and he added all four bullseys to /etc/apt/sources.list at the same time? Please give me some of your professional advice. Thank! Best Regards, - Yunsheng Xie Email: c0ldz...@outlook.com

Re: xterm. Valid /etc/apt/sources.list [Was 26th pass]

now we have a claim that in addition to all your *other* problems, > you have broken Debian sources on at least one of your systems. No > actual *proof*, mind you. Just a claim. > > Or... is it even Debian? Hell. It's probably not. It's probably > your heavily customize

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

Hi Evelyn, On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 06:00:08PM +0200, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote: > E: The repository 'http://security.debian.org/debian-security > bullseye/updates Release' does not have a Release file. A few people have by now pointed out the specific cause of your problem, but the root cause is

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates main contrib > non-free > deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates main > contrib non-free I think you are missing bullseye-security. I have this: deb http://mirrors.linode.com/debian-security/ bulls

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 12:06:18PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-08-15 at 12:00, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote: > > > Hi > > > > apt-get update > > Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease > > Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

t; N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is > therefore disabled by default. > N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user > configuration details. > > > cat /etc/apt/sources.list > # > > # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.10

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

On Sun 15 Aug 2021 at 12:06:18 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-08-15 at 12:00, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote: > > > Hi > > > > apt-get update > > Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease > > Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates Re

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

On 2021-08-15 at 12:00, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote: > Hi > > apt-get update > Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease > Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates Release >404 Not Found [IP: 199.232.138.132 80] > deb http://security

what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

ee apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. cat /etc/apt/sources.list # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.10.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD Binary-1 20210619-16:12]/ bullseye main #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.10.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 xf

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Fungi4All wrote: > LXDE is much more reliable than lxqt. LXQT was buggy and broken still a year or so ago. Now it works nicely and looks good. It will finally replace LXDE. It provides a light environment especially if you can use other QT applications. I tried i

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Fungi4All wrote: > I don't think it says such a thing anywhere, buster can not change > to testing as there is nothing to change for the next 2 years. > > I say you cut that ftp.fi and make it into deb.debian and then > $ sudo apt update > $ sudo apt-get dist-upgr

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Fungi4All wrote: > Isn't Debian 9.1 Stretch? Ah damn, the "9.1" was a typo from me. I experimented with both Stretch and the testing installations under VirtualBox. My post was about "testing" which is now "buster", installed from: debian-testing-i386-netinst.is

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

ch? > I wanted to use the testing branch also after buster goes stable. Isn't this Spring/Summer 2019? > According to this page: > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting > it is possible by editing /etc/apt/sources.list. > I followed the instructions and changed "buster"

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On 16 September 2017 at 23:25, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 16.09.17 15:44, Juha Manninen wrote: >> BTW, the reply address of this mailing list is set wrong. In some >> other lists I can click Reply and it goes to the list. Here it would >> go to the person who sent the last message. I have to e

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On 16.09.17 21:28, Juha Manninen wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Erik Christiansen > > List-Id: > > List-Post: ... > I use the browser interface for GMail. Ok, it is not very geeky but it > works for me. > I cannot see any GMail setting that would a

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Erik Christiansen wrote: > The deficiency lies in your MUA settings. Take a look at the headers on > the list traffic you receive: > > List-Id: > List-Post: > > Without knowing which MUA you use, it's difficult to do the work

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

Eero Volotinen wrote: > You need to import needed gpg key. > Try something like this > gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 7638D0442B90D010 > gpg -a --export 7638D0442B90D010 | sudo apt-key add - No! You should *never* manually import any ReleaseKey. Those should always only come fro

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On 16.09.17 15:44, Juha Manninen wrote: > BTW, the reply address of this mailing list is set wrong. In some > other lists I can click Reply and it goes to the list. Here it would > go to the person who sent the last message. I have to edit the > recipient field. The deficiency lies in your MUA set

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

# export LC_MESSAGES=C root@debian:/home/juha# gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 7638D0442B90D010 key 7638D0442B90D010: 10 signatures not checked due to missing keys gpg: key 7638D0442B90D010: "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) " not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

Juha Manninen [2017-09-16 11:57:32+03] wrote: > # apt-get update > Nouda:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing InRelease [135 kB] > Vrhe:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing InRelease > Seuraavia allekirjoituksia ei voinut varmentaa koska julkista > avainta ei ole saatavilla: NO_PUBKEY 7638D0

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

t; I have installed Debian 9.1.0 buster for i386 using the small netinst > image. Works well. I tested different desktops, too. > > I wanted to use the testing branch also after buster goes stable. > According to this page: > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting > it is possible by ed

Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

is possible by editing /etc/apt/sources.list. I followed the instructions and changed "buster" to "testing" and commented out security update lines. It now looks like this : deb http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ testing main deb-src http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ test

Re: how to get xvid codec even though non-free is there in my /etc/apt/sources.list

Le tridi 23 prairial, an CCXXV, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > Vlc gives me this - > > [7fa1180009c8] vdpau_avcodec generic error: decoder profile not > supported: 7 This means that it is trying to use a hardware-accelerated decoder, and the hardware does not support decoding that particular vide

Re: how to get xvid codec even though non-free is there in my /etc/apt/sources.list

at bottom :- On 11/06/2017, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Dear Friends, > > Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list. I am trying to watch a > video which unfortunately uses xvid codec. I do have libxvidcore4 > installed (using stretch) but it still complains about not having the > right codec. Ca

how to get xvid codec even though non-free is there in my /etc/apt/sources.list

Dear Friends, Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list. I am trying to watch a video which unfortunately uses xvid codec. I do have libxvidcore4 installed (using stretch) but it still complains about not having the right codec. Can anyone help ? -- Regards, Shirish Agar

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sunday 08 May 2011 22:12:23 Dotan Cohen wrote: > That does not mean that I intend to > debate the subject for three days over tens of posts. So why are you doing it?? Here's a revolutionary idea: you could let someone else have the last word and get on with your life. No-one but you yourself

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Mon, 09 May 2011 00:12:23 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 13:28, Camaleón wrote: >>> There is a point when I don't care about being right or wrong, I made >>> my say and I'll not argue over trivial things with people who I'd >>> really rather get along with. >> >> Fine, but

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 13:28, Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 08 May 2011 09:42:49 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > >> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:41, Camaleón wrote: I just tried tinyurl with wget and got the same IP address (and 200 response) as you. I didn't check the links, though. >>> >>> Then?

Re: URL shortening (was Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list)

On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:28:54AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > There were actually a few cases of these link-shortening services > going under. Tr.im went under and was bought, Canonical and Google > both bought and saved one (I don't remember the names) and for a while > bit.ly was under threat

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sun, 08 May 2011 09:42:49 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:41, Camaleón wrote: >>> I just tried tinyurl with wget and got the same IP address (and 200 >>> response) as you. I didn't check the links, though. >> >> Then? Are you still getting trouble to reach the tinyurl web

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:41, Camaleón wrote: >> I just tried tinyurl with wget and got the same IP address (and 200 >> response) as you. I didn't check the links, though. > > Then? Are you still getting trouble to reach the tinyurl web site? If > yes, there could be a filter/proxy in between of y

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 07:50, Freeman wrote: > Craigevil is very cool but his sources.list has open lines so I cleaned it > up, I hope. It's late here. Check it. Especailly for something that wrapped. > That's great, thanks! I will go cherry-pick through there. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 23:34, Heddle Weaver wrote: >> I appreciate your willingness to help, don't get me wrong. But just as >> I am here to learn, I thought that you might also be interested in >> learning the error of using url-shortening services. > > Oh, I remember you now. > Have we a histor

Re: URL shortening (was Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list)

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 01:33, Arno Schuring wrote: > However, this mailing list is archived. That means that links given on > this mailing list are not simply fire-and-forget, they should be able > to be resolved years from now. And while we cannot guarantee that any > link remains valid, it is fo

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, 06 May 2011 23:07:15 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > I just tried tinyurl with wget and got the same IP address (and 200 > response) as you. I didn't check the links, though. Then? Are you still getting trouble to reach the tinyurl web site? If yes, there could be a filter/proxy in between o

Re: URL shortening (was Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list)

On Sb, 07 mai 11, 00:33:59, Arno Schuring wrote: > > In other words, please do not use (unnecessary) URL mangling. It > needlessly makes your message useless for posterity. +1 Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listi

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:04:22AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > Obviously I've done something wrong because on a virgin Squeeze > install /etc/apt/sources.list has no repos other than the disc! Can > someone please send to me a copy of this file. Custom added repos are > fine

URL shortening (was Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list)

Dotan Cohen (dotanco...@gmail.com on 2011-05-06 23:07 +0300): > > No, this is not a matter of preference. There is no reason to pipe the > links through some third party service [..] > > What advantage exists at all to use tinyURL? While I share your sentiment in general (I would never click on a

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On 6 May 2011 21:02, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > > I appreciate your willingness to help, don't get me wrong. But just as > I am here to learn, I thought that you might also be interested in > learning the error of using url-shortening services. Oh, I remember you now. > I apologise if I > steppe

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 16:32, Camaleón wrote: > On Fri, 06 May 2011 15:47:42 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 15:28, Camaleón wrote: Still is for me. >>> >>> It works here but anyway, you can use a TinyURL decoder: >>> >>> http://kiserai.net/turl.pl >>> >>> >> Still 500.

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, 06 May 2011 15:47:42 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 15:28, Camaleón wrote: >>> Still is for me. >> >> It works here but anyway, you can use a TinyURL decoder: >> >> http://kiserai.net/turl.pl >> >> > Still 500. That's a server error, not a network error. I'm surprised >

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 15:28, Camaleón wrote: >> Still is for me. > > It works here but anyway, you can use a TinyURL decoder: > > http://kiserai.net/turl.pl > Still 500. That's a server error, not a network error. I'm surprised that it works for anybody. All I can think of here is geographic loa

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, 06 May 2011 14:02:47 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:57, Heddle Weaver > wrote: >>> The tinyurl server is giving a 500 error. Why on earth would you add >>> an unreliable, third-party link to the already fragile chain of HTTP? >> >> It didn't then and it doesn't now.

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:57, Heddle Weaver wrote: >> The tinyurl server is giving a 500 error. Why on earth would you add >> an unreliable, third-party link to the already fragile chain of HTTP? > > It didn't then and it doesn't now. Still is for me. >> >> I for one do not want tinyurl or any o

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 04:54, Stephen Powell wrote: > There is a sample /etc/apt/sources.list file on my kernel-building web page: > >   http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm > > Look for it under "Step 1: Update Your sources.list File" > That is a terri

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

a configured repo anyway. There is a sample /etc/apt/sources.list file on my kernel-building web page: http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm Look for it under "Step 1: Update Your sources.list File" -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' :

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:44, Heddle Weaver wrote: > Why not install netselect-apt and let that do it for you? > Regards, > 1) I've never heard of it! 2) It doesn't seem to be on the disc, so I'd need a configured repo anyway. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com -

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On 5 May 2011 18:04, Dotan Cohen wrote: > Obviously I've done something wrong because on a virgin Squeeze > install /etc/apt/sources.list has no repos other than the disc! Can > someone please send to me a copy of this file. Custom added repos are > fine, I'll be able to

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:07, kuLa wrote: > deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free > deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free > > deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free > deb-src http://security.debian.org/ sq

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/05/11 09:04, Dotan Cohen wrote: > Obviously I've done something wrong because on a virgin Squeeze > install /etc/apt/sources.list has no repos other than the disc! Can > someone please send to me a copy of this file. Custom a

Need /etc/apt/sources.list

Obviously I've done something wrong because on a virgin Squeeze install /etc/apt/sources.list has no repos other than the disc! Can someone please send to me a copy of this file. Custom added repos are fine, I'll be able to figure it out. Thanks. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

In , Heddle Weaver wrote: >E: Release file expired, ignoring >http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/debian/dists/unstable/Release (invalid since 9h >53min 14s) This error indicates a bad mirror. >Should I re-enter the 'testing' security line back in? >The standard 'testing' line also? Neither of those wi

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Sb, 12 feb 11, 05:54:55, Tom H wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu >> wrote: >> > >> > As far as I understand sid/unstable users should always have testing in >> > their sources.lists, since the Release Managers som

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

table/Release (invalid since 9h > 53min 14s) > > This is after reducing my /etc/apt/sources.list down to just the one line > for 'unstable'. > Should I re-enter the 'testing' security line back in? > The standard 'testing' line also? Re-entering those

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:04:49 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Sb, 12 feb 11, 13:40:58, Camaleón wrote: >> >> So, should people running "sid" also add the whole "testing" repo under >> all circumstances (as default policy) or just when some package is >> broken and is in the need of back to the p

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Camaleón wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:10:49 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > >> On Sb, 12 feb 11, 05:54:55, Tom H wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > >>> > As far as I understand sid/unstable users should always have testing >>> > i

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sb, 12 feb 11, 13:40:58, Camaleón wrote: > > So, should people running "sid" also add the whole "testing" repo under > all circumstances (as default policy) or just when some package is broken > and is in the need of back to the previous version or something is > missing? :-? Can you think

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:10:49 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Sb, 12 feb 11, 05:54:55, Tom H wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: >> > As far as I understand sid/unstable users should always have testing >> > in their sources.lists, since the Release Managers sometime

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

ion-en Ign http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/debian/ unstable/main Translation-en_AU Ign http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/debian/ unstable/non-free Translation-en Ign http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/debian/ unstable/non-free Translation-en_AU Hit http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au unstable Release E: Release file

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sb, 12 feb 11, 05:54:55, Tom H wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu > wrote: > > On Vi, 11 feb 11, 15:33:30, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > >> > >> The testing repositories need not be used either.  They are mostly for when > >> the version in testing differs from the versi

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

In <20110212102917.GK18225@think.homelan>, Andrei Popescu wrote: >On Vi, 11 feb 11, 15:33:30, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> The testing repositories need not be used either. They are mostly for >> when the version in testing differs from the version in unstable, the >> unstable version can't or

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Vi, 11 feb 11, 15:33:30, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> >> The testing repositories need not be used either.  They are mostly for when >> the version in testing differs from the version in unstable, the unstable >> version can't or shou

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Vi, 11 feb 11, 15:33:30, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > The testing repositories need not be used either. They are mostly for when > the version in testing differs from the version in unstable, the unstable > version can't or shouldn't be force-migrated, and the testing version needs > u

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

In , Heddle Weaver wrote: >I've searched the wiki, reference and google like an idiot but can't seem to >find a .list specification for unstable. >I've upgraded from Lenny to Squeeze but want to go a little further. >Does Unstable require a 'security' resource in the list at all. >I'm assuming the

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:04:22 +1000, Heddle Weaver wrote: > I've searched the wiki, reference and google like an idiot but can't > seem to find a .list specification for unstable. I've upgraded from > Lenny to Squeeze but want to go a little further. Does Unstable require > a 'security' resource in

/etc/apt/sources.list

Hello, I've searched the wiki, reference and google like an idiot but can't seem to find a .list specification for unstable. I've upgraded from Lenny to Squeeze but want to go a little further. Does Unstable require a 'security' resource in the list at all. I'm assuming there isn't an unstable 'se

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:08:12 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Lu, 20 dec 10, 14:41:48, Camaleón wrote: >> On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:17:06 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> > >> > This will work for a while, but eventually the 'lenny' directory will >> > be moved off the main mirror system ont

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

On Lu, 20 dec 10, 14:41:48, Camaleón wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:17:06 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > > > This will work for a while, but eventually the 'lenny' directory will be > > moved off the main mirror system onto the archives and the 'oldstable -> > > lenny' will be updated.

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Camaleón wrote: > > http://debian.slimdevices.com/dists/ > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/ > > Why not choosing another mirror that can handle codenames? Or is that a > special mirror, different (non synced) from Debian ones? > > For standard mirrors, shou

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

a year. >> >> > Thanks for the replies everyone. One of my old desktops is dedicated to > running as a Squeezebox slimserver, and in the /etc/apt/sources.list > file when I changed "deb http://debian.slimdevices.com *stable* main" to > "deb http://deb

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

cated to running as a Squeezebox slimserver, and in the /etc/apt/sources.list file when I changed "deb http://debian.slimdevices.com *stable* main" to "deb http://debian.slimdevices.com *lenny *main", it returned an error during "aptitude update". So I guess for the

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

I am home in the future to upgrade to Squeeze after > > it officially becomes the Stable release. I've seen some emails about > > using "Lenny" instead of "stable" in the /etc/apt/sources.list to force > > aptitude to keep a Lenny system. Is this the officia

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

Alexander Batischev wrote: On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:41:48PM +, Camaleón wrote: Do you mean that there is no way to keep the same name for the time it lasts a release? Excuse me for intervening, but no, he does not mean that. You see, you can look at codenames (like 'etch', 'lenny' or 's

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:41:48PM +, Camaleón wrote: > Do you mean that there is no way to keep the same name for the time it > lasts a release? Excuse me for intervening, but no, he does not mean that. You see, you can look at codenames (like 'etch', 'lenny' or 'squeeze') as 'absolute' val

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

e in the future to upgrade to Squeeze after >>it officially becomes the Stable release. I've seen some emails about >>using "Lenny" instead of "stable" in the /etc/apt/sources.list to force >>aptitude to keep a Lenny system. Is this the official/acc

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

. I've seen some emails about using >"Lenny" instead of "stable" in the /etc/apt/sources.list to force aptitude >to keep a Lenny system. Is this the official/accepted method? This will work for a while, but eventually the 'lenny' directory will be moved off t

Re: [SOLVED] Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Alexander Batischev wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:12:48PM -0800, Mark wrote: > > I've seen some emails about using > > "Lenny" instead of "stable" in the /etc/apt/sources.list to force > aptitude > > to ke

Re: Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:12:48PM -0800, Mark wrote: > I've seen some emails about using > "Lenny" instead of "stable" in the /etc/apt/sources.list to force aptitude > to keep a Lenny system. Is this the official/accepted method? Yes, that's absolu

Keeping Lenny via /etc/apt/sources.list when Squeeze becomes stable

bout using "Lenny" instead of "stable" in the /etc/apt/sources.list to force aptitude to keep a Lenny system. Is this the official/accepted method? Currently I have the standard "stable" entries in sources.list, plus backports. Nothing fancy about the installation, stock kernel, etc. Thank you, Mark

Re: Installing postgresql on Debian Lenny-->my /etc/apt/sources.list.

In <20090911131726.26d9d...@mandreev>, Ricky Tompu Breaky wrote: >I can't install PostgreSQL with aptitude: >" >aptitude install postgresql >". > >It seems that the aptitude can not find the postgresql. You'll need to copy and paste the *exact* error message if we are to help at all. Preferably,

Re: Installing postgresql on Debian Lenny-->my /etc/apt/sources.list.

titude can not find the postgresql. > > This is my '/etc/apt/sources.list'. > > I have done "aptitude update" too. And it was completed properly. > > Please tell me what is my mistake. > > Thank you very much in advance. > > === > > deb h

Installing postgresql on Debian Lenny-->my /etc/apt/sources.list.

Dear my friends, I want to install PostgreSQL in my Debian Lenny box. I can't install PostgreSQL with aptitude: " aptitude install postgresql ". It seems that the aptitude can not find the postgresql. This is my '/etc/apt/sources.list'. I have done "aptitude upd

Re: apt-get - problem configuring /etc/apt/sources.list

"Vwaju" wrote: > > With a little help from my friends, I'm teaching myself networking by > building an internet server. I am running Debian Linux 3.1 I would upgrade to Debian 4 (Etch) via Internet by doing these steps: 1.) apt-get clean 2.) replace your /etc/apt/sourc

Re: apt-get – proble m configuring /etc/apt/sources.list

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:55:17 -0800, Vwaju ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Might there be a guide to using apt that is conceptually clearer than > the man page? I am unsure what you mean by "conceptually clearer", but man apt-get seems quite comprehensive to me. I cannot really comment about ap

Re: apt-get -- problem configuring /etc/apt /sources.list

Bob Cox wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 16:26:08 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL > PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Firstly, try use another mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list, for example >> ftp.cz.debian.org or ftp.de.debian.org. > > No. There is no sarge reposit

Re: apt-get – proble m configuring /etc/apt/sources.list

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 16:26:08 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Firstly, try use another mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list, for example > ftp.cz.debian.org or ftp.de.debian.org. No. There is no sarge repository on these servers either. The OP will have to us

Re: apt-get – proble m configuring /etc/apt/sources.list

rk (see > line added 11/19/08, then commented out). > > What does the entry in sources.list needs to look like in order to > download monit_4.5-1_i386.deb? Oldstable/sarge is now too old and is not on the usual mirrors. This is the line to put in your /etc/apt/sources.list: deb

Re: apt-get – problem configuring /etc/ apt/sources.list

ebian.org/debian/pool/main/m/monit/monit_4.5-1_i386.deb > Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP: > 35.9.37.225 21] > E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with > --fix-missing? Firstly, try use another mirror in your /etc/

Re: i'm having some problems, I am a fairly novice user, such as just getting to my /etc/apt/sources.list ( can you help)

On Sunday 16 March 2008 15:52, Thomas D. Gaudette wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su > Password: > c-76-119-151-250:/home/thomas# etc/apt/sources.list > bash: etc/apt/sources.list: No such file or directory > c-76-119-151-250:/home/thomas# file /etc/apt/sources.list > /etc/apt/s

Re: i'm having some problems, I am a fairly novice user, such as just getting to my /etc/apt/sources.list ( can you help)

Thomas D. Gaudette wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su Password: c-76-119-151-250:/home/thomas# etc/apt/sources.list bash: etc/apt/sources.list: No such file or directory c-76-119-151-250:/home/thomas# file /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list: ASCII text c-76-119-151-250:/home/thomas# file

Re: i'm having some problems, I am a fairly novice user, such as just getting to my /etc/apt/sources.list ( can you help)

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:52:50AM -0400, Thomas D. Gaudette wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su > Password: > c-76-119-151-250:/home/thomas# etc/apt/sources.list your asking bash to execute /home/thomas/etc/apt/sources.list, probably not what you want. > bash: etc/apt/sources.list: No

i'm having some problems, I am a fairly novice user, such as just getting to my /etc/apt/sources.list ( can you help)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su Password: c-76-119-151-250:/home/thomas# etc/apt/sources.list bash: etc/apt/sources.list: No such file or directory c-76-119-151-250:/home/thomas# file /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list: ASCII text c-76-119-151-250:/home/thomas# file Usage: file [-bcikLhnNsvz

Re: how to add etch's first CD image to /etc/apt/sources.list

Try apt-cdrom or Synaptic can also do this. On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 00:54 -0700, Serena Cantor wrote: > They say it's impossible. Why? > > > > > Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews

Re: (solved)Re: how to add etch's first CD image to /etc/apt/sources.list

On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:16:54AM -0700, Serena Cantor wrote: > I have solved it on my own. > > --- Serena Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Serena, while it is great that you solved the issue on your own, it would be very much appreciated if you reply to the list with how you solve a particul

(solved)Re: how to add etch's first CD image to /etc/apt/sources.list

I have solved it on my own. --- Serena Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They say it's impossible. Why? > > > > > Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, > and mor

how to add etch's first CD image to /etc/apt/sources.list

They say it's impossible. Why? Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >