On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Ron Johnson wrote:
grub (and maybe lilo) never used to be able to boot from an xfs partition.
Grub can boot from xfs now. Lilo always could. If you install xfs as the
root filesystem on older versions of Debian Stable the installer is smart
enough to realise that Grub w
Clive McBarton wrote:
thib wrote:
Maybe someone simply has reasons not to put /boot on a separate volume.
Now I sure agree that it isn't needed in virtually every other cases,
but would it really hurt?
We are already discussing this in your thread "Single root filesystem
evilness decreasing i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thib wrote:
> Maybe someone simply has reasons not to put /boot on a separate volume.
> Now I sure agree that it isn't needed in virtually every other cases,
> but would it really hurt?
We are already discussing this in your thread "Single root files
Ron Johnson wrote:
grub (and maybe lilo) never used to be able to boot from an xfs partition.
Grub is doing fine, although it's true it had some issues in the past (just
read about them, actually). Can't talk about lilo.
As for the shiver, I also am confused. A 64MB partition, though, real
On 2010-03-08 18:35, thib wrote:
Aioanei Rares wrote:
xfs as a /boot partition?
Why not?
[This is so going off topic.]
grub (and maybe lilo) never used to be able to boot from an xfs
partition.
As for the shiver, I also am confused. A 64MB partition, though,
really doesn't need a hig
5 matches
Mail list logo
