On May 27, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Ah! I would not have thought of that one.
I didn't consider apparmor either. Saw a mention of it on an Ubuntu site.
> Yes. But it isn't enabled by default.
I really don't think it is either. But simply renaming that file in the config
dir
Glenn English wrote:
> apparmor.
Ah! I would not have thought of that one.
> In the recent Debians (Wheezy++, I think), there is a directory
> /etc/apparmor.d. In there is a file called user.sbin.named. That
Yes. But it isn't enabled by default. On a recently installed Debian
Jessie 8 system:
On May 26, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Glenn English wrote:
> apparmor.
No permission probs in the log this morning. Thanks much to those with
suggestions.
--
Glenn English
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
apparmor.
In the recent Debians (Wheezy++, I think), there is a directory
/etc/apparmor.d. In there is a file called user.sbin.named. That file does
various things to the /var/cache/bind directory. I didn't look at it long
enough to figure out just what it does, and I couldn't find apparmor on
On May 25, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Glenn English wrote:
>> root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named
>> bind 2098 1 0 May10 ?00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
>> root 10498 1 0 May10 ?00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c
>> /etc/bind/named.conf
>
> There are two of
On May 25, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Glenn English wrote:
>> root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named
>> bind 2098 1 0 May10 ?00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
>> root 10498 1 0 May10 ?00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c
>> /etc/bind/named.conf
>
> There are two of
Glenn English wrote:
> root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named
> bind 2098 1 0 May10 ?00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
> root 10498 1 0 May10 ?00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c
> /etc/bind/named.conf
There are two of them running? That doesn't seem right. The first
one look
Bob Proulx sent me a number of suggestions, and I tested them. Then I
inadvertently replied to him instead of the list.
Sorry, Bob, and thanks for the ideas.
On May 21, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> The first reason that comes to mind for permission denied is that it
> doesn't have pe
Glenn English wrote:
> I'm getting (and have been for a while) log entries from my slave
> nameservers like:
>
>dumping master file: /var/cache/bind/tmp-0EIP3LrP0G: open: permission
> denied
>...
> drwxrwxr-x 2 bind bind 4096 May 21 10:09 /var/cache/bind/
Good.
> Any ideas?
The first reaso
I'm getting (and have been for a while) log entries from my slave nameservers
like:
dumping master file: /var/cache/bind/tmp-0EIP3LrP0G: open: permission denied
I also see problems with updating modification times of incoming files from
masters.
Debian Wheezy, Bind9
There are hundreds of
10 matches
Mail list logo
