On 14Nov10:1657+1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019657.html
Debian's own Michael Biebl posted the comment to which
Poettering publicly announced this udev roadmap back at
the end of May. How could the assurances udev would
be stay init
Le Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:51:49 -0300,
Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI a écrit :
[...]
>
> If so, what happened to "Linux is all about freedom of choice" ?
GNU/Linux is maybe about "freedom of choice" but GNU/Linux
distributions have never been. You see the difference?
Distribution are integrators that some
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:28:34 +1100
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> So, it will run a course and we will get to the point where systemd will
> be unavoidable in most if not all of the Linux world.
"We are Systemd of Borg, resistance is futile..." ?
If so, what happened to "Linux is all about freedom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/11/2014 9:55 PM, Martin Read wrote:
> On 10/11/14 08:57, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> And for those choosing to go with systemd they'll need 20 updates of
>> Jessie just because the kernel is intrinsically linked to systemd and
>> needs an update
On 10/11/14 08:57, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
And for those choosing to go with systemd they'll need 20 updates of
Jessie just because the kernel is intrinsically linked to systemd and
needs an update.
Debian wheezy entered freeze with Linux kernel version 3.2.30. As of
today, a system running wh
On 11/10/2014 2:01 AM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Sorry, but requiring an up-to-date kernel (or any other infrastructure you
> rely on) instead of maintaining workarounds and compatibility code in
> perpetuity makes perfect sense.
It amazes me the depths that some systemd proponents obfuscate and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/11/2014 7:38 PM, Matt Ventura wrote:
> On 11/9/2014 11:01 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>> Andrew McGlashan:
>>> Forwarding a message "as is" from another mailing list ... very relevant
>>> to Linux and the systemd dilemma.
>>>
>> No, it is not.
On 11/9/2014 11:01 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Andrew McGlashan:
Forwarding a message "as is" from another mailing list ... very relevant
to Linux and the systemd dilemma.
No, it is not.
Sorry, but requiring an up-to-date kernel (or any other infrastructure you
rely on) instead of mainta
> "Andrew" == Andrew McGlashan
> writes:
Andrew> On 10/11/2014 6:01 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Andrew> The world of FreeBSD with ZFS seems so much more appealing day
after day.
Great. Please switch to FreeBSD (it's a great OS), if you do not like
where Linux is headed, instead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/11/2014 6:01 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan:
>> Forwarding a message "as is" from another mailing list ... very relevant
>> to Linux and the systemd dilemma.
>>
> No, it is not.
>
> Sorry, but requiring an up-to-date kernel (or
Hi,
Andrew McGlashan:
> Forwarding a message "as is" from another mailing list ... very relevant
> to Linux and the systemd dilemma.
>
No, it is not.
Sorry, but requiring an up-to-date kernel (or any other infrastructure you
rely on) instead of maintaining workarounds and compatibility code in
p
Forwarding a message "as is" from another mailing list ... very relevant
to Linux and the systemd dilemma.
begin forward...
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019657.html
On Fri, 30.05.14 04:32, Michael Biebl (mbiebl at gmail.com) wrote:
>
> 2014-05-30 4:26 GMT+02:00
12 matches
Mail list logo
