dated from Debian/sid?
Maybe related to an issue I had where I had all the remote sinks not
listed and so was not able to play sounds across network with pipewire-
pulse.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://photos.obry.n
understand correctly there is work on this part, so at some point
Wayland will be the best choice for the already mentioned big
enhancements it brings.
Regards,
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://www.obry.net
gpg --keyserver
uot;serious"
> (whatever that means).
Certainly not! Have you really missed darktable project since 10 years.
Since 1 or 2 years I would certainly call the project "serious" and
many professionals are using it daily. I'm using it since many years
and do prepare exhibitio
Le 14/01/2020 à 21:14, Rainer Dorsch a écrit :
prepend dhcp6.name-servers 2001:4860:4860::, 2001:4860:4860::8844;
avoids the error message, but has no visible effect I can see. The IPv6 DNS
servers still do not show in resolv.conf.
You may receive IPv6 DNS information from IPv6 Router Adv
Le 07/01/2020 à 16:45, Kenneth Parker a écrit :
So are you saying that initrd is called without /
being mounted at all!
Of course. The main purpose of the initramfs is to mount the final root
filesystem before starting the final init.
Le 07/01/2020 à 15:28, Kenneth Parker a écrit :
As far as I know, it's mounted ro, so that initrd can check if it is okay
Nonsense. The initramfs can check the root filesystem before mounting
it, so it does not need to mount it read-only.
(via fsck). And initrd is then supposed to remount
Le 05/01/2020 à 18:50, Joe a écrit :
Windows uses a swap file, not a separate partition. We are told that
there is no performance penalty for Linux to do so also.
Using a swap file can cause a performance penalty if the file is heavily
fragmented. Granted, it also applies to a fragmented LVM
Le 05/01/2020 à 16:40, Clod Turner a écrit :
Why does the Debian Graphical installer compromise any other Linux install
on the same HDD/SSD by reformatting swap.
This is a well known long standing "feature" of the Debian installer. It
is not specific to the graphical installer. Also it does n
Le 05/01/2020 à 11:00, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 10:47:52AM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 04/01/2020 à 20:47, Sven Joachim a écrit :
[FAT, hard links]
a feature that is crucial for dpkg.
I vaguely remember this, but not when and why dpkg needs to create
Le 04/01/2020 à 20:47, Sven Joachim a écrit :
On 2020-01-04 13:38 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Some new boot specification mounts the EFI partition on /boot
Citation needed, which specification is that?
Freedesktop/systemd's Boot Loader Specification.
<https://www.freedesktop.
Le 04/01/2020 à 11:25, Bonno Bloksma a écrit :
I have been creating a small (300MB) primary /boot partition at the beginning
of the disk for as long as I can remember... That is after disks got to be too
big for the BIOS to reach all of the disk to be able to boot from a file
anywhere on the
Le 01/01/2020 à 13:59, l0f...@tuta.io a écrit :
1 janv. 2020 à 10:36 de didier.gau...@gmail.com:
SecureBoot has its own limitations and perhaps your use case is covered here:
https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot#Secure_Boot_limitations
for example, I cannot use SecureBoot on my recent laptop d
Le 29/12/2019 à 20:28, Andreas Goesele a écrit :
I just went from jessie to buster and I didn't discover any serious
problem so far.
But I tried to remove all packages where there is no or only limitid
security support and ended up with 5 packages I don't think I should/can
remove:
binutils (a
Le 16/12/2019 à 16:55, Dr. Jason Amerson a écrit :
Hello,
I installed Debian 10.2.0 from a USB drive and the installation finished
without errors. The only thing that happened during install is that it was
unable to setup the network. Anyways, I removed the USB drive and rebooted the
computer
Le 14/12/2019 à 16:35, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 13:47, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 14/12/2019 à 14:20, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
I've also added:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="resume d823f1ee-2e16-4327-b0c1-639f377002bb"
Wrong syntax. It should be &q
Le 14/12/2019 à 14:20, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
$ sudo update-initramfs -u -k all
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-11-amd64
I: The initramfs will attempt to resume from /dev/sda7
I: (UUID=d823f1ee-2e16-4327-b0c1-639f377002bb)
I: Set the RESUME variable to override this.
(...)
Le 14/12/2019 à 12:26, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
$ sudo update-initramfs -u -k all
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-11-amd64
I: The initramfs will attempt to resume from /dev/sda7
I: (UUID=d823f1ee-2e16-4327-b0c1-639f377002bb)
I: Set the RESUME variable to override this.
I'll
Le 14/12/2019 à 10:43, Alexander V. Makartsev a écrit :
Simple swap partition creation is not enough for hibernation to work, it
also has to be configured in initrd. [2]
Despite the file name it is no longer an initrd but an initramfs.
https://wiki.debian.org/Hibernation#Changing_or_moving_th
Le 10/12/2019 à 20:13, nektarios a écrit :
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Maybe a "MTU black hole" issue with PPPoE.
Workarounds :
- lower the MTU on the client side to 1492
- add a "TCPMSS --clamp-to-pmtu" iptables rule on the router
(...)
The tip you gave me really did the jo
Le 10/12/2019 à 00:01, Nektarios Katakis a écrit :
I am running an iptables firewall on an openwrt router I ve got. Which
acts as Firewall/gateway and performs NATing for my internal network -
debian PCs and android phones.
All good but specific web sites are not loading for the machines that
a
Le 06/12/2019 à 04:15, Brian Vaughan a écrit :
ERROR: problem running ufw-init
Bad argument `DROP'
Error occurred at line: 4
Try `iptables-restore -h' or 'iptables-restore --help' for more
information.
Bad argument `-'
Error occurred at line: 4
(...)
Problem running '/etc/ufw/user.rules'
Pro
Le 04/12/2019 à 13:15, Sergey Spiridonov a écrit :
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 33553920 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 82DD924B-BF0E-40FF-9037-1FD4E7307D26
Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sd
Le 02/12/2019 à 22:28, Gene Heskett a écrit :
On Monday 02 December 2019 16:02:59 Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 02/12/2019 à 02:30, Gene Heskett a écrit :
What I did was plug the u-sd into a card reader/writer.
The card wasn't recognized and dd refused to write to it.
What do you
Le 02/12/2019 à 02:30, Gene Heskett a écrit :
What I did was plug the u-sd into a card reader/writer.
The card wasn't recognized and dd refused to write to it.
What do you mean *precisely* by "wasn't recognized" ?
Then someone said I need to install exfat,
Bullshit.
dd does not care about
Le 23/11/2019 à 20:13, Brian a écrit :
On Sat 23 Nov 2019 at 11:00:58 -0600, pru...@finsakxim.com.mx wrote:
This
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841135
would explain why it works for you, as well as in other cases.
It seems to only work at maximum level 1 directories;
I alr
Le 21/11/2019 à 19:08, pru...@finsakxim.com.mx a écrit :
Now, my last issue is: quick scan always fails, looking only in "common
places". So perhaps the location in the USB sdb3/boot/isos is not
considered a "common place" and thus only full search can find it here.
The quick scan only sear
Le 18/11/2019 à 20:06, Stephen P. Molnar a écrit :
The CPU is an AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor on an ASUSTeK M5A97 R2.0
Motherboard with 8GB Ram. I have started having orphaned inodes when I
run a major piece of software in my research program.
How do you know you have orphaned inodes and
Le 02/11/2019 à 20:07, Joe a écrit :
Kent Dorfman wrote:
I'd make a strong argument that removing the common drivers from
whatever kernel is used in "testing" is more an "unstable" action.
(...)
But at no time should a mature and extremely important device driver get
pulled from it. Somethin
Le 02/11/2019 à 19:34, Kent Dorfman a écrit :
I think we have slightly different perceptions of what the scope of
the "testing" release is.
I think you have a wrong perception of what Debian testing is. Testing
is not stable. Besides, the testing installer images are not intended to
install t
Le 02/11/2019 à 17:45, shirish शिरीष a écrit :
Directory: P:\EFI
ModeLastWriteTime Length Name
- --
d- 15-02-2018 19:21Microsoft
d- 15-02-2018 19:26Boot
d---
Le 02/11/2019 à 15:21, Reco a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 03:12:10PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
IIUC the OP is talking about the netinst installer, not an installed
system. Maybe he encountered a situation where the d-i package
containing NIC modules was not installed yet, or the
Le 02/11/2019 à 13:30, shirish शिरीष a écrit :
/boot/efi/ is empty
As expected. /boot/efi is just a mount point for the EFI partition.
Check /EFI/debian in the EFI partition (FAT).
How did you change Debian boot mode to EFI ?
Can you see a "debian" entry in the UEFI boot menu or boot order ?
Le 02/11/2019 à 14:03, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
Kent Dorfman wrote:
There are no ethernet drivers in the modules directory for the
netinstall image, other than a single broadcomm file...and no, it's
not an obscure nic that requires custom firmware. It needs the humble
e1000 driver.
This i
Le 30/10/2019 à 19:44, basti a écrit :
- setup luks on 3rd partition and edit cryptfs
Can you describe the setup ?
What is cryptfs ? Do you mean /etc/crypttab ?
- update initramfs included crptsetup, lvm, busybox, dm_crypt, dm_mod
- reboot
What it the point in including crypto and LVM supp
Le 29/10/2019 à 20:37, Jimmy Johnson a écrit :
the file system you use matters, some file systems only use uefi and
will give you no legacy support.
Utter nonsense.
Le 29/10/2019 à 17:23, deloptes a écrit :
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
I personally do not see a reason why I should mess up with the bios to
switch back and fort to legacy and not legacy
Because some (many ?) UEFI firmwares are defective and having them boot
a GNU/Linux system in EFI mode can be a r
Le 28/10/2019 à 09:14, Andy Smith a écrit :
I will take a guess that the switching of the iptables commands to
use the nftables framework has somehow caused this iptable_filter
module to not be loaded even though the firewall still works.
Correct.
Is it a bug that loading rules into the filt
Le 07/10/2019 à 09:42, Joe a écrit :
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:26:32 +0200
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 06/10/2019 à 22:45, Beco a écrit :
Now the system can boot both systems ok. But to choose which one
you want, you need to enter the BIOS, change legacy to UEFI, and
vice-versa, then you can boot
Le 06/10/2019 à 22:45, Beco a écrit :
Now the system can boot both systems ok. But to choose which one you want,
you need to enter the BIOS, change legacy to UEFI, and vice-versa, then you
can boot.
Would you mind telling which systems boots in EFI mode and which one
boots in legacy mode ?
Le 05/10/2019 à 21:12, Reco a écrit :
The way I heard it, to trigger the corruption one should issue TRIM
asynchronously *and* utilize NCQ for it. fstrim is synchronous.
Asynchronous and synchronous to what ?
To SSD's I/O queue.
Can you explain what it means or provide any pointers ?
Le 05/10/2019 à 18:27, Reco a écrit :
mdraid and dm-raid have discard disabled by default
with RAID4/5/6 for safety reasons. One must pass the parameter
devices_handle_discard_safely=Y to the module raid456 or dm-raid
respectively to enable it.
I want to make it clear that using this option wi
Le 05/10/2019 à 15:55, Reco a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 02:52:55PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
I've got a computer with 3 SSD in RAID5 (dm-raid) containing a LUKS
partition, then a lvm
dm-raid (device-mapper) or mdraid (mdadm) ?
Is fstrim useful in suc a case ?
It's disabled by defaul
Le 04/10/2019 à 16:45, Albretch Mueller a écrit :
I use ntfs as a data transfer file system between Mac OS, *nix and
Windows (I code primarily in java). Even though while using that
partition through fuser it is noticeable slower, afaik, it is the only
viable option there is.
What does fuser
Le 03/10/2019 à 05:05, David Christensen a écrit :
On 10/1/19 11:51 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Yep. Never forget -- there's a whole computer with its own OS in
your flash drive. That "write protect" (sometimes) available as a
physical switch is just communicated to your drivers via some
protoco
Le 01/10/2019 à 23:09, Ken Heard a écrit :
- - after unmounting and closing encryption running as root 'wipefs -a -f
/dev/sdd' returns 'wipefs: error: /dev/sdd: probing initialization
failed: Read-only file system'.
The USB flash drive is probably physically write-protected.
Check the ke
Le 25/09/2019 à 17:27, Alberto Luaces a écrit :
Pascal Hambourg writes:
Le 25/09/2019 à 13:34, Alberto Luaces a écrit :
Pascal Hambourg writes:
I read a report about a similar issue in a Debian-related forum. IIRC,
a workaround was to connect the keyboard to a USB port of different
type
Le 25/09/2019 à 13:34, Alberto Luaces a écrit :
Pascal Hambourg writes:
I have searched for a key repeat delay in the manual, but I found
nothing.
Which manual ? GRUB or the computer/motherboard ?
GRUB's.
You won't find anything useful there. By default, the keyboard in GRUB
Le 25/09/2019 à 10:27, Alberto Luaces a écrit :
I have switched to a new computer an existing Debian installation.
At boot time, at the GRUB menu, each key press is repeated very fast, as
if the key repeat delay were close to zero: I can only select either the
first or the last option, since pr
Le 08/09/2019 à 02:28, ernst doubt a écrit :
Today I saw the following errors on one of the machines (an HP EliteBook
laptop) that I upgraded today:
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.19.0-5-amd64
cryptsetup: WARNING: The initramfs image may not contain cryptsetup binaries
nor
Le 06/09/2019 à 21:05, Charles Curley a écrit :
Fresh install:
root@jhegaala:~# ll /sbin/depmod /usr/sbin/depmod
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Feb 9 2019 /sbin/depmod -> /bin/kmod*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Feb 9 2019 /usr/sbin/depmod -> /bin/kmod*
Upgraded:
root@hawk:~# ll /sbin/depmod /usr/sb
Le 06/09/2019 à 16:39, Gene Heskett a écrit :
On Friday 06 September 2019 10:20:14 Greg Wooledge wrote:
I could very easily see amanda itself breaking from usrmerge, if it
contains programs that try to invoke commands using their full paths
(e.g. /bin/rm -f ...).
Why would that break ? Old pa
Le 03/09/2019 à 01:47, Miroslav Skoric a écrit :
On 9/2/19 1:19 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
You should have upgraded the kernel as
soon as you upgraded from Wheezy to Jessie. Same when upgrading from
Jessie to Stretch.
Probably you are right. But it makes me wonder why the previous upgrade
Le 02/09/2019 à 16:44, Miroslav Skoric a écrit :
On 9/2/19 10:28 AM, Reco wrote:
fsck.ext4 -f /dev/localhost/tmp
mount -t ext4 /dev/localhost/tmp /tmp
umount /tmp
fsck.ext4 -f /dev/localhost/tmp
If the mounting succeeds, change filesystem type to ext4 for /tmp in
/etc/fstab, and do the same fo
Le 02/09/2019 à 09:56, Miroslav Skoric a écrit :
lsblk didn't bring any difference regardless the stick is inserted or
not. So I send photos :-)
There was a wrong free block count on /dev/localhost/tmp, but it seems
to be corrected now. Anyway this kind of minor error should not prevent
mou
Le 02/09/2019 à 00:51, Miroslav Skoric a écrit :
Sure. I sent few photos on the commands' output. Don't know if the list
accepts attachments.
I don't think it accepts binary files.
Le 02/09/2019 à 00:44, Miroslav Skoric a écrit :
On 9/2/19 12:26 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 01/09/2019 à 22:59, Miroslav Skoric a écrit :
root@(none):/# uname -a
Linux (none) 3.2.0-4-486 #1 Debian 3.2.96-2 i686 GNU/Linux
So you upgraded from Jessie to Stretch but still ran the old
Le 01/09/2019 à 22:59, Miroslav Skoric a écrit :
root@(none):/# uname -a
Linux (none) 3.2.0-4-486 #1 Debian 3.2.96-2 i686 GNU/Linux
So you upgraded from Jessie to Stretch but still ran the old kernel from
Wheezy all this time ? Wow.
If the dist upgrade was not complete (and if the system no
Le 01/09/2019 à 17:01, Miroslav Skoric a écrit :
EXT3-fs (dm-6): error: couldn't mount because of
unsupported optional features (8000)
This is not the same as the previous error message you showed while
using the Debian Jessie 8.11 installer in rescue mode :
EXT4-fs (dm-6): couldn't mount
Le 01/09/2019 à 01:04, Miroslav Skoric a écrit :
# dmesg | tail reported (among the other):
EXT4-fs (dm-6): couldn't mount as ext3 due to feature incompatibilities
EXT4-fs (dm-5): couldn't mount as ext3 due to feature incompatibilities
# mount reported that /, /usr, and /var were there, but n
Le 26/08/2019 à 20:23, rhkra...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Monday, August 26, 2019 09:20:13 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
The "bytes-per-inode" value ("-i" option) is the closest match to what
you described. The man page doesn't tell us what the default value is,
but the Arch wiki says it's one inode per
Le 25/08/2019 à 14:54, Richard Owlett a écrit :
On 08/25/2019 07:36 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
2. What is the proper search term to use for something whose dimensions
would be "megabytes/inode"? {I'll use "blob" for now }
This is just a ratio without any act
Le 25/08/2019 à 14:10, rhkra...@gmail.com a écrit :
I suppose that, for someone who was going to archive a lot of mail and store
it in maildir format, they might have to consider more inodes (i.e., the news
option).
Probably. Or use a filesystem type such as Btrfs or XFS which, unlike
ext*, d
Le 25/08/2019 à 13:20, Richard Owlett a écrit :
How do I search for answer to my inadequately phrased question below.
1. I assume that sector size is a _TERM_ reserved for something fixed
when the disk is manufactured.
With modern disks, there are two sector sizes :
- the physical sector s
Le 25/08/2019 à 10:06, Hadi Motamedi a écrit :
On 8/25/19, der.hans wrote:
du -sh /usr/*
That will show you disk usage per directory in /usr/.
My preferred command is
du -hxd1 /usr | sort -h
- ignores other filesystem (e.g. if you mounted something on /usr/local)
- does not ignore "dot" f
Le 25/08/2019 à 02:33, Rick Thomas a écrit :
On Aug 24, 2019, at 4:18 PM, l...@contacte.xyz wrote:
What would be the «best» to choose for an SSD in an usual desktop environment ?
What would be the «best» to choose for an mechanical HD in an usual desktop
environment ?
I don’t think there’s an
Le 16/08/2019 à 23:27, Steffen Dettmer a écrit :
(Apparently man used uid 13 in Debian 8 / Jessi but 6 in Debian 9 /
Stretch).
AFAICS, user "man" has had UID 6 since at least Debian 6/squeeze.
Le 11/08/2019 à 22:54, Russell L. Harris a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 09:09:26PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 11/08/2019 à 19:38, Finariu Florin a écrit :
Hi everyone,Can you tell me where I find the step by step
installation of Debian 10 with GRUB Command line?I'm in Debian
Le 11/08/2019 à 19:38, Finariu Florin a écrit :
Hi everyone,Can you tell me where I find the step by step installation of
Debian 10 with GRUB Command line?I'm in Debian UEFI installer mode.
What do you mean by "installation of Debian 10 with GRUB Command line" ?
Le 11/08/2019 à 09:42, Reco a écrit :
The big question is - why would anyone make a RAID10 consisting of two
drives. It's impossible to reshape it (mdadm does not support it for
RAID10), it's I/O characteristics are indistinguishable from RAID1.
With two drives the default RAID 10 "near" layou
Le 10/08/2019 à 19:27, David Christensen a écrit :
On 8/10/19 4:35 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
Personally I would use the three devices as a RAID-10 which would
result in half the capacity of the total (768G) and you could
withstand the loss of any one device.
RAID 10 requires 4 drives:
Not Linux
Le 10/08/2019 à 13:03, Pavel Vlček a écrit :
I have computer with 3 hdds. One is ssd, 2 others are hdd. I want to
install Debian 10 to all 3 disks as one big system.
What do you mean by "one big system" ? One big filesystem ? Why ?
What to use, raid or lvm?
If you are concerned with perfo
Le 04/08/2019 à 22:56, Long Wind a écrit :
the file is more than 3 G, i can't read it with nanoi have 3 G memory, no swap
You do not use an *editor* to *read* a file, you use a pager such as
more, less, most...
why don't X print important error msg to terminals?i can't see any of them
is
Le 04/08/2019 à 12:43, Long Wind a écrit :
i think i find out
it's in ~/.local it's Xorg.0.log.old
it's more than 3.9G
it seems keeping growing
clearly i don't need it, i delete it
it should solve my problem
What about Xorg.0.log ?
If these files keep growing up to such a size, then it means th
Le 01/08/2019 à 20:06, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 07:58:56PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 01/08/2019 à 18:18, David Wright a écrit :
I think that a lot of people install resolvconf (deliberately or
incidentally) without really understanding what it's for or wh
Le 01/08/2019 à 19:58, Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
Le 01/08/2019 à 18:18, David Wright a écrit :
I think that a lot of people install resolvconf (deliberately or
incidentally) without really understanding what it's for or what
it does. Then, because most people naturally check the conten
Le 01/08/2019 à 18:18, David Wright a écrit :
I think that a lot of people install resolvconf (deliberately or
incidentally) without really understanding what it's for or what
it does. Then, because most people naturally check the contents of
/etc/resolv.conf, they indulge in all sorts of cargo-
Le 31/07/2019 à 23:30, ghe a écrit :
On 7/31/19 2:52 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Without resolvconf, the DHCP client would have completely overwritten
resolv.conf instead of just adding one line. With resolvconf, at least
you can have some control over resolv.conf.
OK. vi gives me all the
Le 31/07/2019 à 21:44, ghe a écrit :
On 7/31/19 1:20 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I still feel like you're missing the big picture here. resolvconf isn't
the thing that's modifying your /etc/resolv.conf file.
It's the thing (that was) modifying my resolv.conf.
Resolvconf does not modify resolv
Le 31/07/2019 à 19:56, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 07:51:45PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 31/07/2019 à 17:10, Bob Bernstein a écrit :
What I want to do is get rid of the google 8.8.8.8 and replace it with a
static nameserver suggested by my vpn.
Edit /etc/network
Le 31/07/2019 à 17:10, Bob Bernstein a écrit :
What I want to do is get rid of the google 8.8.8.8 and replace it with a
static nameserver suggested by my vpn.
Edit /etc/network/interfaces.
Le 29/07/2019 à 13:08, Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
Prefix delegation is a DHCPv6 feature. The kernel does managed it.
Oops ! I meant "the kernel does NOT manage it".
Le 29/07/2019 à 11:07, Harald Dunkel a écrit :
question about IPv6 support in sid: Whose job is it to bother
about the IPv6 addresses dynamically bound to eth0?
It depends what dynamic configuration method is used.
SLAAC (using router advertisements) is in kernelspace. However some
informatio
Le 29/07/2019 à 00:26, Finariu Florin a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I can not install GRUB on Debian 10.It's fail every time.
AFAIK GRUB supports RAID and most software RAID levels (only "linear" is
not supported).
How does it fail ? What is the error message ? What is displayed in the
log console
Le 23/07/2019 à 20:28, Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
If the system on the USB drive is GNU/Linux, you just need to put /boot
on the internal drive so that GRUB can load them.
Oops, my sentence was a bit incomplete.
You just need to put /boot on the internal drive so that GRUB can load
the
Le 23/07/2019 à 17:37, Martin McCormick a écrit :
It may turn out to be less of a headache to make it a
duel-boot system. One boot would be the latest debian console
and the other would be Debian Wheezy
If the system on the USB drive is GNU/Linux, you just need to put /boot
on the in
Le 23/07/2019 à 04:53, Martin McCormick a écrit :
The PC is old enough that it can not natively boot via a serial
port but it might if grub knew about the bootable drive sitting
in one of the ports.
Do you mean that GRUB is installed on an internal drive ?
By default, GRUB relies on the BIOS di
Le 06/07/2019 à 23:02, Joe a écrit :
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 13:23:49 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
I'm going wireless with
it. USB. No problem with that, but . . . What's the easiest way to
prevent the wired ethernet (built-in on motherboard) from starting up?
I was thinking of just commenting it
Le 26/06/2019 à 20:15, Ross Boylan a écrit :
So do you think the chroot generated initrd would have been OK if I'd
mounted proc?
Yes.
Le 24/06/2019 à 01:40, Ross Boylan a écrit :
# update-initramfs -u -k 4.19.0-5-amd64
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.19.0-5-amd64
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/cryptroot: 64:
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/cryptroot: cannot open /proc/mounts:
No such file
cryptsetup: WARNING
Le 23/06/2019 à 08:27, Gene Heskett a écrit :
On Saturday 22 June 2019 22:49:36 John Hasler wrote:
Gene writes:
Well, I'd expect there is a registration fee...
...particularly since it may take a whole cluster of servers to
cover locally, the whole ipv6 address space.
I don't know what you m
Le 23/06/2019 à 04:06, Ross Boylan a écrit :
My leading suspect for why the hard disks aren't recognized is that
they are all attached through
02:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic
SAS2116 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-2 [Meteor] (rev 02)
whereas before they were vanill
Le 03/05/2019 à 15:32, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 06:10:45AM +, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
I would like to understand why apt-get upgrade holds backup the upgrade of the
Linux kernel.
Because the kernel ABI changed, and a new package has to be installed.
It's not just an up
Le 18/06/2019 à 18:19, Reco a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 04:45:59PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 18/06/2019 à 16:11, Reco a écrit :
The problem can be 'solved' by announcing specific IP routes to each and
every host on both sites. Yes, it's gross.
Not all hos
Le 18/06/2019 à 18:15, David Wright a écrit :
It's long been a disappointment that there's no
GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_LABEL=true parameter in /etc/default/grub.
What for ? grub-mkconfig does not use LABELs by defaut, so there is no
need to disable them. I wish there was a way to tell grub-mkconfig
Le 18/06/2019 à 16:11, Reco a écrit :
Custom routes? When routing between 2 networks using the same range,
either with a VPN or some kind of direct connection? It's going to need
some evil double NAT sorcery, especially if the same actual addresses
are in use on both.
As long as:
a) It's L3 V
Le 17/06/2019 à 17:39, Curt Howland a écrit :
Yes, IPv6 does have such allocations. The first 64bits is network
block, then the last 64bits are your local machine.
Unless you want to enable SLAAC which requires 64+64, you can select
different sizes for the network the host parts. Your network
Le 18/06/2019 à 14:46, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 02:39:53PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 17/06/2019 à 19:00, Dan Ritter a écrit :
sudo apt remove avahi*
This may raise some dependency issues. Here :
The following packages will be REMOVED:
adwaita-icon-theme
Le 17/06/2019 à 19:00, Dan Ritter a écrit :
sudo apt remove avahi*
This may raise some dependency issues. Here :
The following packages will be REMOVED:
adwaita-icon-theme avahi-daemon bochs bochs-term bochs-x
ca-certificates-java colord default-jre default-jre-headless epdfview
firefox
Le 17/06/2019 à 04:50, Felix Miata a écrit :
I recommend learning to use LABELs on all your filesystems. They are massively
easier for humans to work with than UUIDs. You get to assign them in accordance
with how your brain functions, e.g.:
#
LABEL=m12P01esp
Le 16/06/2019 à 15:53, Stephen P. Molnar a écrit :
I have just installed a new SSD in my 64 bit Stretch platform.
When I boot the machine I get the following error:
error: file '/boot/grub/i386-pc/normalmod' not found
Entering rescue mode .. . .
grub rescue>_
Pressing Contro-Alt-Delete reboots
1 - 100 of 1403 matches
Mail list logo
