x27;:
/usr/src/asterisk-1.8.3/include/asterisk/lock.h:635: undefined reference to
`__sync_sub_and_fetch_4'
utils.o: In function `ast_atomic_fetchadd_int':
/usr/src/asterisk-1.8.3/include/asterisk/lock.h:589: undefined reference to
`__sync_fetch_and_add_4'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [asterisk] Error 1
make: *** [main] Error 2
Thanks so much
\RR
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> RR put forth on 2/16/2011 1:14 PM:
>
> > All through this though I'm assuming that since the kernel modules seem
> to
> > be loaded already and if I'm planning to configure the HBAs via config
> files
&
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Martin Habets <
errandir_n...@mph.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
> > The way my boot server is setup is, that it has tftp, /etc/ethers and
> > /etc/hosts files all setup.
>
> You'll also need either bootparamd or dhcpd set up.
>
I don't believe that's required by Debian. B
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> No. What I'm saying is that Qlogic never shipped, and does not ship, a
> >> SPARC/Linux binary of its utility package. And they don't ship the
> source.
> >> If
> >> that package is required to program that HBA, then you're hosed,
> sc
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> No. What I'm saying is that Qlogic never shipped, and does not ship, a
> SPARC/Linux binary of its utility package. And they don't ship the source.
> If
> that package is required to program that HBA, then you're hosed, screwed.
>
>
Hi Stan
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Thoroughly read the Debian iSCSI HBA documentation, specifically the
> sections
> relating to the QLA4xxx series adapters.
>
> --
> Stan
>
Thanks Stan, will have a look and see what I can find. Just the confidence
with which you say it, I'm a
Hello All,
So I have a QLA4010c on my V240 running Debian. Debian seems to have picked
the existance of the adapter in the machine and pre-loaded some kernel
modules already:
# lsmod | grep -i qla
qla4xxx58248 0
scsi_transport_iscsi34328 1 qla4xxx
scsi_mod 16743
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Yes, it's a tiny HTTP proxy with some sugar, getting extra knowledge
> from package databases or predefined configuration and making more
> optimal decissions than ordinary HTTP proxies.
>
> If you decide to use it, you could reuse
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Freeman wrote:
> This may not help. I made on on-disk version for debs I build or scarf.
> There are examples for creating package files and of a release file.
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/repository-howto/repository-howto
>
> Of course apt-cacher-ng will
may not have a"Valid Release" file.
Does anyone know how to fix this or know what's wrong?
Thanks so much
\R
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:12:05PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 01:39:59PM -0600, Boyd
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:08 PM, RR wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Richard Mortimer
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 02/02/2011 17:55, RR wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> We think we have ruined the image that comes with the SC or s
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Richard Mortimer wrote:
>
>
> On 02/02/2011 17:55, RR wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We think we have ruined the image that comes with the SC or something
>> but we were trying to install Debian Linux on this V240. On the OBP we
&g
.tar.gz and debian-installer and what not...but I can't figure out where
do I get that from.
I have tried:
ok> boot net
and
ok> boot net - install nfsroot=10.1.3.1:/mnt/iso
and
ok> boot net install
Any one wish to comment?
Thanks so much
\RR
Hi All,
We think we have ruined the image that comes with the SC or something but we
were trying to install Debian Linux on this V240. On the OBP we typed
*ok boot new linux root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=10.1.3.1:/mnt/iso ip=10.1.3.11:10
.1.3.1:10.1.3.254:255.255.255.0:SPARC01*
Where:
/mnt/iso is where
>
> Honestly, I'd rather just rebuild this machine, but I'm not there
>> physically anymore and given the problems I had in installing Debian on
>> that Sparc machine while I was actually there, if I have those again,
>> when I'm now 8,000 miles away, that's going to be bad! On EVERY Sparc
>> syst
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Carl Johnson wrote:
> RR writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Carl Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> RR writes:
> >>
> >> > I see as more messages are pouring in, this message is getting pushed
> >>
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Carl Johnson wrote:
> RR writes:
>
> > I see as more messages are pouring in, this message is getting pushed
> down
> > further and people won't even see it anymore. Does anyone have a personal
> > doco, blog , cheatsheet for mod
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:37 PM, RR wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:34 PM, RR wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:49:06 -0500, RR wrote:
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> > Once
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:34 PM, RR wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:49:06 -0500, RR wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> > Once the system gets to the login prompt and I login and run 'df -h', I
>
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> RR put forth on 1/21/2011 3:24 PM:
>
> > # mii-tool -v bond-voipvlan
> > bond-voipvlan: 10 Mbit, half duplex, link ok
> > product info: vendor 00:01:00, model 0 rev 4
> > basic mode: 10 Mbit, half dupl
the bonding.
Should I ignore the statistics reported by mii-tool for the bonded interface
and be happy knowing that the actual physical interfaces are still
communicating at full-speed?
Cheers,
\RR
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:49:06 -0500, RR wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> > Once the system gets to the login prompt and I login and run 'df -h', I
> > see
>
> You should check the above filesystem errors and try to
boot partition. I have now
edited my fstab file to mount /dev/sda1 so /boot will mount everytime the
system comes back up.
Thanks again :)
\RR
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:46:07 -0500, RR wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:12 P
ng all sort of cart-wheels in
Debian/Linux, I don't know what the heck these dm-* partitions are, which
seem to be where this missing space is, and how do I get to it to create a
valid partition out of it and mount it and use it?
Thanks so much in advance,
\RR
Hi Camaleón
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:51:47 -0500, RR wrote:
>
> > I'm a brand spanking new Debian "wanna-be" user. I was trying to
> > configure bonding on my machine following instructions here:
> &
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> RR wrote:
> > However, does anyone know if I can actually get Bonding to work without
> > needing to modify or touch the /boot/config-`uname -r` file with the
> default
> > configuration and it being hidden/inaccessibl
d out where these files are.
However, does anyone know if I can actually get Bonding to work without
needing to modify or touch the /boot/config-`uname -r` file with the default
configuration and it being hidden/inaccessible at the moment?
Thanks so much for ALL the help for all. This user-group is
Hi Bob,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> RR wrote:
> > The instructions talk about checking params in the boot/config-`uname -r`
> > file which doesn't exist on my system. In fact the /boot directory on my
> > system is empty.
>
> Empty
`uname -r`
file which doesn't exist on my system. In fact the /boot directory on my
system is empty. How do I get this config file in there? Do I need to
install some package like kernel source or something to get it in there? I'm
running Debian Lenny 5.0.7 on Sparc x64 BTW
Thanks in advance for the help
\RR
29 matches
Mail list logo
