for a short moment and
> again I got an dns-error.
this looks like a dns problem.
work this:
$ ping your.debian.box ??
if not try this:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:901(IP of your debian-box)
in your web-browser
have a lucky day
Peter Wintrich
PS: sorry my poor english
> I've
.400 root/usr/sbin/swat swat
in your /etc/inetd.conf
and type:
http://your.swat.box:901
in your browser.
man swat works fine for additional information :-)
Peter Wintrich
t
> BR>> when I run it using 8 bpp, the sound is very good.
> BR>>
check your IRQ- and io-seting
# less /proc/interrupts
# less /proc/ioports
any VGA cards using interupts for higher modes.
Peter Wintrich
you must have a boot partition comlete into the lower 1024 cyl.
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Adam Shand wrote:
>
> i'm sure this is a faq but i can't find the answer so i'm hoping someone
> here can give me a quick pointer to the right direction.
>
> i just got done installing slink on a 13Gb maxtor
Hi,
put a new drive (same size or biger) in your system.
the new drive must only be low-level formatet (adapter-bios function).
Then start your linux-system and make
$> dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=1024 or similar
In assumption sda is your old and sdb your new drive.
It's tested with linux, N
I thing the most SB-CD ROM only support audio.
bootmessage > only audio will work
last test with 2.0.36
Peter
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, David Densmore wrote:
> I just installed an old Sound Blaster Pro CD-ROM and compiled kernel
> support for it. I think I have done everything right because the
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Hans wrote:
> I've been comparing (not)lame313 and bladeenc today and (not)lame does
> sound equally good at 128 compared to bladeenc at 256 bitrate. I use The
> Who's 'Won't Get Fooled Again' for comparison, if you wonder.
>
> What I can't get done with (not)lame is batch
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Hans wrote:
> I've been comparing (not)lame313 and bladeenc today and (not)lame does
> sound equally good at 128 compared to bladeenc at 256 bitrate. I use The
> Who's 'Won't Get Fooled Again' for comparison, if you wonder.
>
> What I can't get done with (not)lame is batch
tability" of M$-Excel.
I have tested StarOffice 5.0 on Kernel 2.2.6 against Excel on NT 4.0.
I'm use gnuplot instead.
- high performnce
- high quality plots
- high stability
but a little bit of trainig for your first positive experience.
have a lucky day
Peter Wintrich
PS: sorry my poor english
9 matches
Mail list logo
